司法部检察长霍洛维茨称,FBI 和司法部腐败的深层政府官员在科米泄露了他的备忘录后感到“震惊”,这些备忘录扼杀了他们对特朗普的起诉

2019年9月21日15:24:55司法部检察长霍洛维茨称,FBI 和司法部腐败的深层政府官员在科米泄露了他的备忘录后感到“震惊”,这些备忘录扼杀了他们对特朗普的起诉已关闭评论 3674965字阅读16分33秒

司法部检察长霍洛维茨称,FBI 和司法部腐败的深层政府官员在科米泄露了他的备忘录后感到“震惊”,这些备忘录扼杀了他们对特朗普的起诉

The corrupt cops at the FBI that protected James Comey from crimes didn't realize that by doing so they ruined their chances of attaching obstruction to candidate and President Trump!

保护詹姆斯·科米免受犯罪侵害的联邦调查局腐败警察没有意识到,他们这样做毁掉了他们给候选人和特朗普总统设置障碍的机会

According to the DOJ's IG report on James Comey,Comey leaked his memos to his friend who he later described as his lawyer which protected him by implementing attorney-client privilege.This protected Comey from the crime of leaking information to the press unlawfully.

根据司法部关于詹姆斯·科米的检察长报告,科米将他的备忘录泄露给了他的朋友,他后来称这位朋友是他的律师,这位律师通过实施《法律专业特权保护了他。这使科米免于非法向新闻界泄露信息的罪行。

But Comey was also protected by his fellow gangsters at the FBI when then labeled the memos that he leaked,other than classified.If they were labeled classified Comey would be in serious trouble for leaking classified information.

但当科米将他泄露的备忘录贴上机密以外的标签时,他也受到了 FBI 黑帮同伙的保护。如果他们被贴上机密的标签,科米将会因为泄露机密信息而陷入严重的麻烦。

The FBI isn't supposed to let on that there are any active investigations,let alone leak"evidence"from their investigations.

联邦调查局不应该透露有任何正在进行的调查,更不用说泄露他们调查的"证据"了。

So what was the FBI's supposed basis for obstruction of justice charges against Trump?

那么,联邦调查局对特朗普的妨碍司法指控的依据是什么呢?

1.Trump's firing of Comey;

1.特朗普解雇科米;

2.Trump's asking Comey to let Flynn go(as outlined in Memo No.4).

2.特朗普要求科米释放弗林(见第4号备忘录)

So Trump's comments about letting Flynn go was THE basis,THE EVIDENCE,for obstruction of justice.That in and of itself should mean that information related to this was highly classified.But Comey's Memo No.4 was labeled by the FBI as"unofficial business use"?How can your prime evidence in a case be labeled"unofficial business use"?

所以特朗普关于放走弗林的言论就是妨碍司法的基础----证据。这本身就意味着与此有关的信息是高度机密的。但是科米的第四号备忘录被联邦调查局贴上了"非正式商业用途"的标签?你在一个案件中的主要证据如何被贴上"非正式商业用途"的标签?

The reason why the FBI labeled it that way was because Comey gave that Memo No.4 to his buddies and the press.It's the same tactic they pulled when they relabeled Clinton's crimes regarding her emails.

联邦调查局之所以这么说,是因为科米把第四号备忘录给了他的朋友和媒体。这和他们重新标注克林顿在电子邮件上所犯罪行时使用的策略是一样的。

I mean,either it's evidence or it isn't,because they sure were using it as evidence….

我的意思是,要么是证据,要么不是,因为他们肯定把它当作证据..

Here's the even bigger issue about this,though…..

这里有一个更大的问题。

In order to even begin to try to charge Trump with obstruction of evidence,you need both President Trump's firing of Comey and his asking Comey to go easy on General Flynn(of course we know now that Flynn was set up by the corrupt FBI and committed no crime related to his firing and has been indicted of no crime related to his firing).You can't have one without the other.If the only evidence you have is Comey's firing,that proves nothing.You can probably try to begin to charge Trump with obstruction of justice if you have just the Flynn comment alone,but obviously,they didn't feel as though that was enough;otherwise,they'd have charged Trump back in February when he said it,but they didn't.

为了开始指控特朗普妨碍证据,你需要特朗普总统解雇科米,以及他要求科米对弗林将军宽容(当然,我们现在知道,弗林是腐败的联邦调查局设立的,没有犯下与解雇他有关的罪行,也没有被指控与解雇他有关的任何罪行)。两者缺一不可。如果你唯一的证据就是科米被解雇了,那也证明不了什么。如果你只有弗林的评论,你可以试着开始指控特朗普的妨碍司法,但是很明显,他们觉得这还不够;否则,他们会在特朗普2月份说这句话的时候指控他,但是他们没有。

This means Comey screwed the investigation when he leaked his memos to the press.If they tried to charge Trump with anything related to the leaks,then they'd have to charge Comey with leaking highly classified information.What an idiot…

这意味着当科米把备忘录泄露给媒体时,他搞砸了调查。如果他们试图指控特朗普与泄密有关的任何事情,那么他们就必须指控科米泄露高度机密的信息。真是个白痴..

Which means that on day one Mueller KNEW without a doubt that HE HAD NO CASE……

这意味着在第一天穆勒毫无疑问地知道他没有案子..

Ahhhh,I see now….and that's why the AG refused to charge Comey,because then they'd have to admit that it actually was evidence…..No wonder the corrupt FBI's reaction to Comey's leaking of his memos was reportedly shock–

啊,我现在明白了...这就是为什么总检察长拒绝起诉科米,因为那样他们就不得不承认这实际上是证据...难怪腐败的联邦调查局对科米泄露备忘录的反应据说是震惊的

What this means is,they defeated themselves.By leaking this information to the press,they had a conundrum.If they charged Trump with obstruction of justice,then they were forced to also charge Comey with leaking highly classified information to the press.In chess parlance,it would be a stalemate,which Trump would probably ultimately win since the Paragraph 1 would come from a criminal/liar(Comey).

这意味着,他们战胜了自己。通过向媒体泄露这些信息,他们遇到了一个难题。如果他们指控特朗普犯有妨碍司法罪,那么他们也不得不指控科米向媒体泄露高度机密的信息。用国际象棋术语来说,这将是一个僵局,特朗普可能最终会赢得这个僵局,因为第1段将来自一个罪犯/说谎者(科米)

The"classification review"was nothing more than a now that we're really screwed here,how do we salvage this mess.

"分类审查"只不过是一个现在我们真的搞砸了,我们如何挽救这个烂摊子。

That's why Mueller classified Comey's"evidence"both ways,both classified and unclassified.They would pursue the obstruction of justice charges privately,quietly,treating Comey's memos as"highly classified,"while their public face would be treating them as"unclassified"so that Comey wouldn't be charged.

这就是为什么穆勒将科米的"证据"分为机密和非机密两类。他们会私下悄悄地追究妨碍司法的指控,将科米的备忘录视为"高度机密",而他们的公众形象则是将其视为"非机密",这样科米就不会受到指控。

That's why Trump's legal team told Mueller,we will tear you to shreds in a court of law,and Mueller backed down.Corrupt Mueller knew he would lose.

这就是为什么特朗普的法律团队告诉穆勒,我们会在法庭上把你撕成碎片,而穆勒做出了让步。腐败的穆勒知道他会输。

The Deep State and corrupt FBI and DOJ had no case for removing President Trump,he committed no crimes,nor did Flynn for that matter.They set them up,but thanks to corrupt FBI Director James Comey,they screwed their own coup!

深州和腐败的联邦调查局和司法部没有理由罢免特朗普总统,他没有犯罪,弗林也没有犯罪。他们陷害了他们,但多亏了腐败的联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米,他们搞砸了自己的政变

来源:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/doj-ig-horowitz-states-that-corrupt-deep-state-actors-in-fbi-and-doj-were-shocked-when-comey-leaked-his-memos-that-killed-their-case-against-trump/

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2019年9月21日15:24:55
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接