2019年5月14日09:30:50新闻孟山都向癌症患者赔偿20亿美元已关闭评论3163字数 7712阅读25分42秒阅读模式


Posted on 发表于May 13,2019 2019513 by 作者Carey Gillam 凯里·吉拉姆

After less than two full days of deliberations,a California jury ordered Monsanto to pay just over$2 billion in punitive and compensatory damages to a married couple who both developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma they say was caused by their many years of using Roundup products.


After listening to 17 days of trial testimony,jurors said Monsanto must pay$1 billion to Alberta Pilliod,who was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma brain cancer in 2015,and another$1 billion to her husband Alva Pilliod,who was diagnosed in 2011 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma that spread from his bones to his pelvis and spine.The couple,who are both in their 70s,started using Roundup in the 1970s and continued using the herbicide until only a few years ago.The jury also awarded the couple a total of$55 million in damages for past and future medical bills and other losses.



In ordering punitive damages,the jury had to find that Monsanto"engaged in conduct with malice,oppression or fraud committed by one or more officers,directors or managing agents of Monsanto"who were acting on behalf of the company.


Pilliod v.Monsanto is the third Roundup cancer case to go to trial.And it is the third to conclude that Monsanto's glyphosate-based herbicides can cause cancer and that Monsanto has long known about–and covered up–the risks.


In March,a unanimous jury in federal court in San Francisco ordered Monsanto to pay roughly$80 million in damages for failing to warn plaintiff Edwin Hardeman of the cancer risks of Roundup herbicide.Last August,jurors in state court in San Francisco ordered Monsanto to pay$289 million  in damages to school groundskeeper Dewayne"Lee"Johnson,who is dying of non-Hodgkin lymphoma the jury found was caused by his exposure to Monsanto's glyphosate herbicides.The judge in that case lowered the total verdict to$78 million and the verdict is now on appeal.

今年3月,旧金山联邦法院的陪审团一致裁定孟山都公司支付约8000万美元的赔偿金,因为孟山都公司未能就农达除草剂的致癌风险向原告埃德温·哈德曼发出警告。去年8月,旧金山州法院的陪审员要求孟山都支付2.89亿美元给学校园丁 Dewayne"Lee"Johnson,他因接触孟山都的草甘膦除草剂而死于非霍奇金氏淋巴瘤。该案的法官将判决总金额降至7800万美元,现在该判决正在上诉中。

Both Johnson and Hardeman attended closing arguments in the Pilliod trial.

约翰逊和哈德曼都出席了 Pilliod 审判的结案陈词。

The Pilliod verdict is expected to only further erode the market value of Bayer AG,which purchased Monsanto last summer for$63 billion.Shares have dropped more than 40 percent since the Aug.10 Johnson verdict was handed down.


More than 13,000 plaintiffs have filed similar lawsuits against Monsanto,alleging the company's herbicides cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the company has hidden the risks.


Evidence laid out in the three trials included numerous scientific studies that showed what plaintiffs'attorneys said was proof Monsanto's herbicides can cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma.As well,the attorneys presented jurors with many internal Monsanto communications obtained through court-ordered discovery that show Monsanto has intentionally manipulated the public record to hide the cancer risks.


Among the many revelations that have emerged from the trials:


*Monsanto never conducted epidemiology studies for Roundup and its other formulations made with the active ingredient glyphosate to evaluate the cancer risks for users.


*Monsanto was aware that the surfactants in Roundup were much more toxic than glyphosate alone.


*Monsanto spent millions of dollars on covert public relations campaigns to finance ghostwritten studies and articles aimed at discrediting independent scientists whose work found dangers with Monsanto's herbicides.


*When the US Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry sought to evaluate glyphosate toxicity in 2015,Monsanto engaged the assistance of EPA officials to delay that review.


*Monsanto enjoyed a close relationship with certain officials within the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA),who have repeatedly backed Monsanto's assertions about the safety of its glyphosate products.


*The company internally had worker safety recommendations that called for wearing a full range of protective gear when applying glyphosate herbicides,but did not warn the public to do the same.


Pilliod attorney Brent Wisner suggested to jurors in his closing arguments that they consider punitive damages in the range of$1 billion to send a message to Monsanto and Bayer about the need to change the company's practices.


"The jury saw for themselves internal company documents demonstrating that,from day one,Monsanto has never had any interest in finding out whether Roundup is safe,"Wisner said following the verdict."Instead of investing in sound science,they invested millions in attacking science that threatened their business agenda."


Michael Miller,who served with Wisner as co-lead trial counsel said:"Unlike the first two Monsanto trials,where the judges severely limited the amount of plaintiffs'evidence,we were finally allowed to show a jury the mountain of evidence showing Monsanto's manipulation of science,the media and regulatory agencies to forward their own agenda despite Roundup's severe harm to the animal kingdom and humankind."

威斯纳律师事务所的联席首席法律顾问迈克尔·米勒(Michael Miller):"在孟山都的前两次审判中,法官严格限制了原告的证据数量,但我们最终获准向陪审团展示大量证据,证明孟山都操纵科学、媒体和监管机构推进自己的议程,尽管朗达对动物王国和人类造成了严重伤害。"

Bayer issued a statement after the verdict saying it would appeal:"Bayer is disappointed with the jury's decision and will appeal the verdict in this case,which conflicts directly with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency's interim registration review decision released just last month,the consensus among leading health regulators worldwide that glyphosate-based products can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic,and the 40 years of extensive scientific research on which their favorable conclusions are based.

在判决之后,拜耳公司发表了一份声明,表示将提起上诉:"拜耳公司对陪审团的裁决感到失望,并将对本案的判决提起上诉,这与美国环境保护局(Environmental Protection Agency)上月公布的中期注册审查决定直接冲突。该决定与全球主要卫生监管机构达成的共识一致,即草甘膦产品可以安全使用,且草甘膦不致癌,而且40年的广泛科学研究为其有利结论提供了依据。

"We have great sympathy for Mr.and Mrs.Pilliod,but the evidence in this case was clear that both have long histories of illnesses known to be substantial risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(NHL),most NHL has no known cause,and there is not reliable scientific evidence to conclude that glyphosate-based herbicides were the"but for"cause of their illnesses as the jury was required to find in this case."

"我们对皮利奥德夫妇深表同情,但本案的证据清楚地表明,他们都有长期的疾病史,这些疾病被认为是导致非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的重大风险因素,大多数 NHL 没有已知的病因,而且没有可靠的科学证据得出结论,认为基于草甘膦的除草剂是导致他们患病的"但为"原因,因为陪审团需要在本案中找到这种原因。"

The damage award breaks down as follows:


Alva Pilliod




Past economic–$47,296.01


Past non-economic loss–$8 million


Future non-economic loss–$10 million


Punitive damages–$1 billion


Alberta Pilliod




Past economic–$201,166.76


Past non-economic–$8 million


Future economic–$2,957,710


Future non-economic–$26 million


Punitive damages–$1 billion


TOTAL–$2.055 billion


A federal judge has ordered Bayer to start mediation with plaintiffs'attorneys and a hearing is set for next week in San Francisco on that issue.Several more trials are scheduled over the next year in courts around the United States.




  • 本文由 发表于 2019年5月14日09:30:50
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接