由于伤害和死亡的增加,企业放弃使用抗凝血剂疫苗

2021年6月9日15:57:28由于伤害和死亡的增加,企业放弃使用抗凝血剂疫苗已关闭评论 3074289字阅读14分17秒
摘要

在我看来,任何人未经完全知情同意而向另一人注射试验性药物,导致死亡,即构成谋杀从犯。但是,我敢肯定,这一点也被放弃了。

由于伤害和死亡的增加,企业放弃使用抗凝血剂疫苗

A recent pulse survey from the Fisher Phillips law firm has found that at least 83 percent of employers are not even considering trying to implement an employee mandate for W×an coronavirus(Covid-19)vaccines.

费舍尔菲利普斯律师事务所最近的一项脉冲调查发现,至少83%的雇主甚至没有考虑实施雇员强制接种武×冠状病毒疫苗的2019冠状病毒疾病。

As corporations like Delta Airlines and Houston Methodist Hospital proudly flaunt their foolishness in attempting to outlaw bodily autonomy,most other corporations are wisely taking a step back,if not for any other reason than to avoid the inevitable lawsuits.

像达美航空公司和休斯顿卫理公会医院这样的公司骄傲地炫耀他们试图取缔身体自主权的愚蠢行为,而大多数其他公司明智地后退了一步,如果不是为了避免不可避免的诉讼的话。

That 83 percent figure is up from 64 percent back in January,showing that many more employers are wising up to the fact that it is a really bad idea to try to force Ch×e Virus injections on their employees.

83%的数字比一月份的64%有所上升,这表明越来越多的雇主意识到强迫员工注射天×病毒是一个非常糟糕的主意。

While most employers,around 75 percent,say they are encouraging workers to get vaccinated,only a very small percentage are even attempting to try to force it as a condition of employment.

虽然大多数雇主,大约75%,说他们正在鼓励工人接种疫苗,但只有极少数人甚至试图强迫它作为就业的条件。

Thirty-two percent of respondents say they would prefer to avoid running afoul of anti-discrimination laws,while 54 percent said they believe that all employees willing to get injected without a mandate have already done so.

32%的受访者表示,他们宁愿避免与反歧视法律发生冲突,而54%的受访者表示,他们相信所有愿意在没有得到授权的情况下接受注射的员工都已经这样做了。

Fisher Phillips found that most employers are keener on encouraging vaccination rather than trying to require it.This is a wise approach as any company that attempts to force vaccination is likely to go under in the end from all the resultant litigation.

费舍尔·菲利普斯发现,大多数雇主更热衷于鼓励接种疫苗,而不是试图要求接种。这是一个明智的做法,因为任何企图强制接种疫苗的公司最终都可能因为由此引发的所有诉讼而破产。

Companies that attempt to force W×an Flu shots on employees are just asking to go out of business

企图强迫员工接种武×流感疫苗的公司只是在要求破产

At the time when the survey was conducted,the U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC)had already released its own guidance claiming that employers can require their employees to get jabbed with Wuhan Flu shots.

在这项调查进行的时候,美国平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)已经发布了自己的指导意见,声称雇主可以要求他们的员工注射武汉流感疫苗。

This is,of course,a poor guidance because it will only lead employers that attempt to do so right into the trap of endless litigation.For this reason,the smarter ones have already decided not to even attempt to go there.

当然,这是一个糟糕的指导,因为它只会把企图这样做的雇主引入无休止的诉讼的陷阱。出于这个原因,那些更聪明的人已经决定甚至不去那里。

The dumb ones,like Delta and Houston Methodist,have made themselves targets for potentially multi-million-dollar payouts once the inevitable lawsuits run their course.

达美航空(Delta)和休斯顿卫理公会(Houston Methodist)等愚蠢的公司,一旦不可避免的诉讼结束,就会成为潜在数百万美元赔偿的目标。

It is almost as if some companies want to be driven out of business due to their insistence on being medical fascists.Delta and Houston Methodist clearly need a reminder that they are not their employees'doctors,and thus have no right to impose a medical intervention that could end up killing them.

由于坚持成为医疗法西斯分子,一些公司似乎希望被赶出市场。德尔塔卫理公会和休斯顿卫理公会显然需要一个提醒,他们不是员工的医生,因此没有权利强加医疗干预,可能最终导致他们的死亡。

It is important to note that the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA)has already made it clear that employees who become injured or die from mandatory Wuhan Flu shots at their places of employment are free to sue their employers for maximum damages.

值得注意的是,联邦职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)已经明确规定,在雇佣地点因强制注射武汉流感疫苗而受伤或死亡的雇员可以自由起诉其雇主,要求其支付最高限额的赔偿金。

This could spell serious financial drain on any company that is dumb enough to attempt such a thing,which a few are.Most,thankfully,are staying in their lane and letting their employees make their own health decisions through informed consent.

这可能意味着,任何愚蠢到尝试这种做法的公司都将面临严重的资金流失,而少数公司正在这样做。值得庆幸的是,大多数公司都坚持自己的做法,让员工在知情同意的情况下自己做出健康决定。

While OSHA dropped the requirement that employers report covid vaccine injures,employers can still be held liable for any vaccine injuries that arise due to company mandates.

虽然职业安全与健康管理局放弃了要求雇主报告孕妇疫苗伤害的规定,但是雇主仍然可以对由于公司的要求而引起的任何疫苗伤害承担责任。

"Windex in your office requires,by OSHA,to have a Material Data Sheet,but reactions to experimental'vaccinations'i.e.deaths as a result in the workplace,are no longer reportable.Wow!"noted one Natural News commenter.

"职业安全与健康管理局要求你办公室里的 Windex 必须有一份材料数据表,但是对实验性'疫苗'的反应,比如在工作场所导致的死亡,不再需要报告。哇!"一位自然新闻的评论者写道。

"In my opinion,any person injecting another person with an experimental drug without full informed consent,which leads to death,is an accessory to murder.But,I'm sure that's been waived,too."

"在我看来,任何人未经完全知情同意而向另一人注射试验性药物,导致死亡,即构成谋杀从犯。但是,我敢肯定,这一点也被放弃了。"

"It is amazing the'protections'required by osha,and yet,experimental,emergency use drugs just skipped a page or 2 of the rules,"responded another.

另一位网友回应道:"osha 要求的'保护措施'令人惊讶,然而,实验性的紧急使用药物只是跳过了规则的一两页。"

**By Ethan Huff

作者:Ethan Huff

**Source

转自:

https://www.afinalwarning.com/525049.html

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2021年6月9日15:57:28
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接