在德克萨斯州百日咳爆发,尽管有100%的疫苗接种率还是迫使学校关闭

2019年12月24日11:30:38在德克萨斯州百日咳爆发,尽管有100%的疫苗接种率还是迫使学校关闭已关闭评论 436 10375字阅读34分35秒
摘要

最近德克萨斯州休斯顿一所学校爆发百日咳,迫使学校提前关闭。尽管事实上100%的儿童已经接种了疫苗,这次疫情还是发生了。

事实:最近德克萨斯州休斯顿一所学校爆发百日咳,迫使学校提前关闭。尽管事实上100%的儿童已经接种了疫苗,这次疫情还是发生了。

反思:疫苗的有效性如何?是否有任何相关的风险?这里的答案是否是更多剂量的疫苗?

A whooping cough outbreak has forced a school in Houston,Texas to close early for the Christmas break.The school,St.Theresa Catholic School in Memorial Park,will be closed until January 6th.The outbreak has not only affected the students but also the staff.Some children have also been hospitalized as a result,the Houston Chronicle reports.

德克萨斯州休斯顿的一所学校由于百日咳爆发而被迫提前关闭,以备圣诞假期。位于纪念公园的圣特里萨天主教学校将关闭至16日。疫情不仅影响了学生,也影响了教职员工。一些儿童也因此被送进了医院,休斯敦纪事报报道。

It's one of multiple instances that point to the idea that whooping cough,also known as pertussis,is not indicative of a failure to vaccinate,but rather,a failing vaccine.According to Fox,"Officials with the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston said that 100 percent of students who attend St.Theresa Catholic School are vaccinated against the illness."

百日咳,也被称为百日咳,并不意味着疫苗接种失败,而是一种失败的疫苗,这是众多例子中的一个。据 Fox 报道,"Galveston-Houston 大主教管区的官员表示,在圣特里萨天主教学校就读的学生100%都接种了疫苗。"

According to ABC News,

据美国广播公司新闻报道,

According to a statement from the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston,the school notified the community of the first confirmed case on Dec.4.The case was then reported immediately to the Texas Department of State Health Services to investigate.he archdiocese also said all of St.Theresa's students are vaccinated,and it's working closely with the Houston Health Department.

根据 Galveston-Houston 大主教管区的一份声明,该校于124日向社区通报了首例确诊病例。该病例随后立即报告给德克萨斯州卫生服务部进行调查。大主教教区还表示,圣特蕾莎大学的所有学生都接种了疫苗,该教区正与休斯敦卫生部密切合作。

You can also view the press release sent out to the parents via the school at Greenmedinfo.com here,in also emphasizes that 100 percent of the children were and have been vaccinated.

你也可以查看通过 greenmedinfo.com 的学校发给家长的新闻稿,同时强调100%的孩子已经接种了疫苗。

It's Not A Surprise

这并不意外

People shouldn't be too surprised,however,because there is a lot of science that has been published over the years showing that multiple vaccines may not actually be working as well as they're marketed to be.

然而,人们不应该感到太惊讶,因为多年来发表的大量科学研究表明,多种疫苗实际上可能并不像市场上宣传的那样有效。

For example,a study titled "The Pertussis resurgence:putting together the pieces of the puzzle"states:

例如,一项名为《百日咳的复苏:拼凑拼图》(The Pertussis resurgence:putting The pieces of The puzzle)的研究指出:

More recent studies show that by 5 years after completion of a DTaP series,children were up to 15 times more likely to acquire pertussis compared to the first year after the series.Studies have also documented rapid decline in pertussis antibodies within as few as 2–3 years of the most recent aP vaccination,often to pre-vaccination levels and although antibody levels alone are not necessarily indicative of waning immunity,in this case given the higher risk of infection after aP vaccine with time,it is strongly suggestive of it.

最近的研究表明,在 DTaP 系列完成5年后,儿童患百日咳的可能性是该系列完成后第一年的15倍。研究还证实,在最近的 aP 疫苗接种后的2-3年内,百日咳抗体迅速下降,通常降至接种前水平,虽然单独的抗体水平不一定表明免疫力下降,但在这种情况下,鉴于随着时间的推移,接种 aP 疫苗后感染的风险较高,这强烈提示了这一点。

A very recent study published in the Journal of The Paediatric Infectious Diseases Society titled:The 112-Year Odyssey of Pertussis and Pertussis VaccinesMistakes Made and Implications for the Future outlines how,because of linked-epitope suppression,all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes,and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.(Full study)

最近发表在《儿科传染病学会杂志》上的一项研究,题为:百日咳和百日咳疫苗的112年奥德赛-错误和对未来的影响,概述了由于链接表位抑制,所有接种了 DTaP 疫苗的儿童在他们的一生中更容易感染百日咳,而且没有简单的方法来降低这种增加的易感性。(全面研究)

In the last 13 years,major pertussis epidemics have occurred in the United States,and numerous studies have shown the deficiencies of DTaP vaccines,including the small number of antigens that the vaccines contain and the type of cellular immune response that they elicit.Because of linked-epitope suppression,all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes,and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.

在过去13年中,美国发生了主要的百日咳流行病,许多研究表明,DTaP 疫苗存在缺陷,包括疫苗含有的抗原数量少,以及引起的细胞免疫反应类型。由于链表位抑制,所有接种 DTaP 疫苗的儿童在其一生中都更容易感染百日咳,而且没有简单的方法来降低这种增加的终生易感性。

A study published in BMC medicine titled"Asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis"emphasizes:

发表在 BMC 医学杂志上的一篇题为"无症状传播和百日咳杆菌复苏"的研究强调:

In this paper,we have presented empirical evidence—from both case and genomic data—for asymptomatic B.pertussis transmission following the switch from the wP to the aP vaccine in the US and UK.Then,using mathematical and computational transmission models,we have demonstrated that an aP vaccine which blocks symptomatic disease but not asymptomatic transmission is able to account for the observed increase in B.pertussis incidence…public health authorities may be facing a situation similar to that of polio,where vaccinated individuals can still transmit infection.

在这篇论文中,我们提供了美国和英国无症状百日咳传播的病例和基因组数据的经验证明。然后,使用数学和计算传播模型,我们已经证明,阻断症状性疾病但不是无症状传播的 aP 疫苗能够解释观察到的百日咳发病率的增加...公共卫生当局可能面临类似脊髓灰质炎的情况,在那里接种疫苗的个人仍然可以传播感染。

For a more in depth look into this specific paper,download the slides as a PowerPoint presentation.

要更深入地了解这篇文章,请下载幻灯片作为 PowerPoint 演示文稿。

The studies above outline why it shouldn't be a surprise that this current outbreak in a Texas school is happening despite the fact that 100 percent vaccine coverage has been achieved.

上述研究概述了为什么尽管疫苗覆盖率已经达到100%,但目前德克萨斯州一所学校的疫情仍在发生,这不应该令人感到惊讶。

Is It Worth It?

值得吗?

With vaccine failure exemplified in a number of cases,is the vaccine really worth it?Are there risks associated with it?These are important questions to ask,and in this day in age,information,no matter how credible,is being severely censored.It just doesn't seem right and most health professionals seem to be oblivious to the type of information that's presented in this article.

随着疫苗失败的例子在一些情况下,疫苗真的值得吗?有没有相关的风险?这些都是要问的重要问题,在这个时代,信息,无论多么可信,都会受到严格的审查。这似乎是不正确的,大多数健康专业人士似乎没有注意到这篇文章中提出的信息类型。

Until the 1990s,the vaccine administered to children for diphtheria,tetanus and pertussis protection was the DTP vaccine,one of the first combination vaccines ever licensed by the U.S.Food and Drug Administration(FDA).However,as a"whole-cell"vaccine(meaning that it contained the entire Bordetella pertussis organism rather than purified components),DTP had a significant downside—including published safety concerns dating back to the 1930s and widespread reports of neurological damage emanating from both the United States and other countries.By 1991,the Institute of Medicine cautiously reported that the evidence was"consistent with a possible causal relation between DTP vaccine and acute encephalopathy"[brain disease].

直到20世纪90年代,白喉、破伤风和百日咳疫苗都是白喉、破伤风和百日咳混合疫苗,是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)首批批准的混合疫苗之一。然而,作为一种"全细胞"疫苗(意味着它包含整个百日咳杆菌微生物而不是纯化的成分)DTP 有一个明显的缺点ーー包括公开发表的安全问题可以追溯到20世纪30年代,以及来自美国和其他国家的关于神经损伤的广泛报道。到1991年,医学研究所谨慎地报告说,这些证据"与白喉、破伤风疫苗和急性脑病之间可能的因果关系一致"[脑病]

Furthermore,one must example the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act(NCVIA),with statistics from the vaccine adverse events reporting system(VAERS).Since it's inception the NCVIA has protected pharmaceutical companies as vaccines are a liability free product,and has used nearly$4 billion to payout to families of vaccine injured children.CDC researchers assessed over two decades'worth of data(1991–2016)from the CDC-and FDA-administered passive surveillance system,VAERS,examining adverse events(AEs)reported to VAERS following vaccination with one of five currently licensed DTaP vaccines(see table).The five vaccines included two DTaP-only vaccines(approved for the full five-dose series of shots)and three combination vaccines(approved for some portion of the DTaP series).The combination formulations in question included DTaP plus hepatitis B vaccine(HBV),inactivated polio vaccine(IPV)and/or Haemophilus influenzae type b(Hib)vaccine.

此外,必须举例说明国家儿童疫苗伤害法(NCVIA),统计数据来自疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)。自成立以来,NCVIA 一直保护制药公司,因为疫苗是一种免责产品,并已用近40亿美元支付给疫苗受伤儿童的家庭。美国疾病控制和预防中心的研究人员评估了20多年来美国疾病控制和预防中心和美国食品及药物管理局实施的被动监测系统 vaars 的数据(1991-2016),检查了使用目前获得许可的五种 DTaP 疫苗中的一种疫苗接种后向 vaars 报告的不。这五种疫苗包括两种只适用于非杀伤人员地雷的疫苗(批准用于整个五剂量系列疫苗)和三种组合疫苗(批准用于非杀伤人员地雷系列的部分疫苗)。所涉及的混合制剂包括 DTaP 加乙型肝炎疫苗(HBV)、灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV)/或流感嗜血桿菌 b (Hib)疫苗。

The analysis of VAERS reports identified tens of thousands of AEs(N=50,157)in the aftermath of a DTaP-containing vaccine.(A single VAERS report may include more than one AE,so the adverse event categories are not mutually exclusive.)VAERS,by the federal government's own admission,captures only about 1% of AEs;thus,the 50,000-plus AEs probably vastly underrepresent the number of real-world DTaP-related vaccine injuries.

vaars 报告的分析发现,在含有白喉、破伤风和无菌接种疫苗之后,发生了数以万计的白喉、破伤风和无菌接种。(单一的 VAERS 报告可能包括一个以上的 AE,所以不良事件类别不是互相排斥的。)联邦政府自己承认,VAERS 只捕获了大约1% AEs;因此,50,000多个 AEs 可能大大低估了现实世界中与非杀伤人员地雷相关的疫苗伤害的数量。

Roughly one in nine(11.2%)of the reported AEs were coded as serious,and 15%of all serious AEs were deaths(844/5,627).(If one were to average these deaths over the 26 years from 1991 through 2016,this would represent over 32 deaths annually.)

大约九分之一(11.2%)的已报告 AEs 被编码为严重,15%的严重 AEs 是死亡(844/5,627)(如果把1991年至2016年的26年间这些死亡人数的平均数计算在内,那么每年的死亡人数将超过32人。)

You can read more about that,in depth,here.

你可以在这里阅读更多关于这方面的内容。

There is a lot of information out there.Not long ago,a team of Scandinavian scientists has conducted such a study and the results are alarming.That study,funded in part by the Danish government and lead by Dr.Soren Wengel Mogensen,was published in January in EBioMedicine.Mogensen and his team of scientists found that African children inoculated with the DTP(diphtheria,tetanus and pertussis)vaccine,during the early 1980s had a 5-10 times greater mortality than their unvaccinated peers.

外面有很多信息。不久前,一组斯堪的纳维亚科学家进行了这样的研究,结果令人担忧。这项研究部分由丹麦政府资助,由索伦·温格尔·莫根森博士领导,发表在今年1月的《生物医学》杂志上。莫根森和他的科学家小组发现,在20世纪80年代早期,接种白喉、破伤风和百日咳疫苗的非洲儿童的死亡率比未接种疫苗的同龄人高出510倍。

The authors close with a bracing rebuke to public health regulators,"It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials.All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria,tetanus or pertussis.Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections."

作者对公共卫生监管机构提出了令人振奋的指责,"应该关注的是,常规疫苗接种对全因死亡率的影响并没有在随机试验中得到检验。所有现有的证据表明,白喉、破伤风或百日咳疫苗可能杀死更多的儿童从其他原因比它挽救白喉,破伤风或百日咳。虽然疫苗可以保护儿童免受目标疾病的侵害,但同时也可能增加非相关感染的易感性。"

You can read more about that specific study in more detail,here.

你可以在这里阅读更多关于这个特定研究的细节。

The Takeaway

外延

Should information on vaccines really be censored?Why are terms like"anti vax"and ridicule always used instead of simply addressing rebutting the arguments made by vaccine safety advocates.Are vaccines really as safe and effective as they're marketed to be?

关于疫苗的信息真的应该被审查吗?为什么像"anti vax"和奚落这样的术语总是被使用,而不是简单地用来反驳疫苗安全倡导者提出的论点。疫苗真的像市场上宣传的那样安全有效吗?

Of course,health authorities are well aware of this information,and are simply urging people to vaccinate more frequently,including a booster shot alter in life.In New Brunswick,Canada,health officials currently recommend children have doses of the pertussis vaccine at two months,four months and six months,then again at 18 months and at four years old.There is also a booster dose in Grade 7.New Brunswick is also experiencing an outbreak.(source)

当然,卫生当局对这一信息了如指掌,并且敦促人们更频繁地接种疫苗,包括在生活中接种疫苗。在新不伦瑞克,卫生官员目前建议儿童在2个月、4个月和6个月时接种百日咳疫苗,然后在18个月和4岁时再接种一次。在七年级还有一种加强剂。新不伦瑞克也正在经历一场疫情爆发。(来源)

来源:https://www.collective-evolution.com/2019/12/22/whooping-cough-outbreak-despite-a-100-percent-vaccination-rate-forces-school-closure-in-texas/

  • 本文由 发表于 2019年12月24日11:30:38
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接