萨拉博士|2020/8/1 向国会和五角大楼提供的机密 UFO 简报揭露了什么?

2020年8月3日09:51:36萨拉博士|2020/8/1 向国会和五角大楼提供的机密 UFO 简报揭露了什么?已关闭评论 578 14808字阅读49分21秒
摘要

7月23日,《纽约时报》(New York Times)发表了一篇文章,描述了著名天体物理学家埃里克•戴维斯(Eric Davis)博士向美国国会和五角大楼提交的机密 UFO 简报。戴维斯从1996年开始研究”开箱即用”的科学现象。


On July 23,the New York Times released an article describing classified UFO briefings delivered to the US Congress and the Pentagon by Dr.Eric Davis,a prominent astrophysicist,researching"out of the box"scientific phenomena since 1996.The authors of the New York Times story,Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal,provided few details of the briefings other than Davis'sensational claim that UFOs(aka UAPs)involved"off-world vehicles not made on this earth".

723日,《纽约时报》(New York Times)发表了一篇文章,描述了著名天体物理学家埃里克戴维斯(Eric Davis)博士向美国国会和五角大楼提交的机密 UFO 简报。戴维斯从1996年开始研究"开箱即用"的科学现象。《纽约时报》这篇报道的作者莱斯利基恩(Leslie Kean)和拉尔夫布卢门撒尔(Ralph Blumenthal)除了戴维斯耸人听闻的声明——不明飞行物(ufo)涉及"地球上没有制造的外星车辆"——之外,几乎没有提供任何有关简报的细节。

The New York Times article was quickly picked up by other major media such as the Huffington Post,Popular Mechanics,and popular news sites that included Yahoo News.More recently,Scientific American called for a resumption of scientific studies on UFOs in a very telling sign that mainstream scientists are finally paying attention.

纽约时报》的这篇文章很快就被其他主要媒体转载,比如纽约赫芬顿邮报,纽约大众机械,以及包括雅虎新闻在内的流行新闻网站。最近,《科学美国人》呼吁恢复对不明飞行物的科学研究,这一非常明显的迹象表明,主流科学家终于开始关注了。

Senator Marco Rubio was informed about the classified briefing given by Dr.Davis to staffers from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence,which Rubio currently heads.He subsequently arranged for his Committee to give a bipartisan vote of approval(14-1)for the Intelligence Community to write up a comprehensive report on UFOs/UAPs in 180 days after the Bill's passage into law.

参议员马尔科·卢比奥(Marco Rubio)获悉了戴维斯博士向参议院情报特别委员会(Senate Select Committee on Intelligence)工作人员所做的机密简报。卢比奥目前担任该委员会主席。随后,他安排其委员会进行两党投票,批准情报界在该法案通过成为法律后180天内编写一份关于不明飞行物/不明飞行物的全面报告(14-1)

Significantly,the Director of National Intelligence was instructed that the"report shall be submitted in unclassified form,but may include a classified annex".This means that the report is intended to be released to the general public.

值得注意的是,国家情报总监得到指示,"报告应以非机密形式提交,但可包括机密附件"。这意味着该报告的目的是向公众发布。

What is missing in the New York Times article and subsequent news stories are the precise details of what Davis briefed members of Congress and Pentagon officials.It can be assumed that the briefings involved information derived from a 15-page leaked transcript/summary of an October 16,2002 conversation between Dr.Davis and Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson,who retired as the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency,only a few months before the meeting.

在《纽约时报》的文章和随后的新闻报道中缺少的是戴维斯向国会议员和五角大楼官员介绍情况的精确细节。可以假定,这些简报涉及的信息来自一份15页泄露的文字记录/摘要,记录了20021016日戴维斯博士与退休的国防情报局(Defense Intelligence Agency)局长、海军中将托马斯·威尔逊(Thomas Wilson)之间的谈话。

I covered the Davis and Wilson leaked document in a three-part series(available here,here and here).Put simply,the document revealed Wilson's failed efforts in 1997 to gain access to an Unacknowledged Special Access Program,which he had learned involved a corporation studying a retrieved UFO/extraterrestrial craft.Wilson had hoped Davis could shed light on what was happening in the corporate reverse engineering program.

我在一个由三部分组成的系列文章中报道了戴维斯和威尔逊泄露的文档(可以在这里、这里和这里获得)。简而言之,这份文件显示,威尔逊在1997年曾试图进入一个未被承认的特殊访问项目,但失败了。他获悉,该项目涉及一家公司,研究一个回收的 ufo/外星飞行器。希望 Davis 能够解释一下企业逆向工程项目中发生的事情。

视频:https://youtu.be/AqVWYvsaeWg

While it is highly likely that parts of the 15-page document were included in Davis'classified briefings to Congressional staffers and Pentagon officials,we don't know what conclusions Davis had reached about what Wilson had confidentially shared with him.The leaked document focused on Wilson's experiences,rather than what Davis knew about the topic.

尽管这份长达15页的文件很有可能包含在戴维斯向国会工作人员和五角大楼官员提交的机密简报中,但我们不知道戴维斯对威尔逊向他透露的秘密信息得出了什么结论。泄露的文件集中在威尔逊的经历,而不是什么戴维斯知道的话题。

Consequently,an interview given by Davis on May 10,2019,five months before his briefing to Congressional staffers,where he gave his evaluation of UFOs and extraterrestrial life becomes highly significant.The interview gives us a very good idea of what Davis told Congress and the Pentagon,which has now been made an issue of national importance due to the New York Times story,and the looming Intelligence Community report destined to emerge in early 2021.

因此,2019510日,在他向国会工作人员做简报的五个月前,他接受了 Davis 的采访,在那里他对 ufo 和外星生命的评估变得非常重要。这次采访让我们对戴维斯告诉国会和五角大楼的事情有了一个很好的了解,由于《纽约时报》的报道以及即将在2021年初出炉的情报界报告,这个问题现在已经成为一个具有全国重要性的问题。

In fact,a strong case can be made that Davis'briefings will be used as the fulcrum of a UFO/UAP disclosure narrative that will emerge in early 2021 with the release of the unclassified intelligence UAP report to Congress.This is where there is much in what Davis told Congressional staffers and Pentagon officials that raises alarming red flags that a"limited hangout"is being prepared over classified programs involving the retrieval and reverse engineering of crashed UFOs.

事实上,一个强有力的例子是,戴维斯的简报会将被用作 UFO/UAP 披露叙事的支点,这种叙事将在2021年初随着非机密情报 UAP 报告提交给国会而出现。这就是 Davis 告诉国会工作人员和五角大楼官员的很多内容,这些内容提出了一个警示性的危险信号,即针对搜寻和逆向工程搜寻坠毁的不明飞行物的机密项目,正在准备进行一次"有限的外出活动"


While the truth will be told of the non-Earthly origin of some retrieved UFOs,the successful reverse engineering of such craft by major aerospace corporations will be hidden from the public,along with the existence of visiting extraterrestrial life.

虽然一些被找到的 ufo 的非地球起源的真相将会被告知,但是主要的航空航天公司对这种飞行器的成功逆向工程将会对公众隐瞒,同时还有访问外星生命的存在。

What follows is my analysis of Davis's comments in the interview he conducted with Alejandro Rojas from Open Minds TV,which is available both in audio form on YouTube and as a rough transcript from an automated translation.I have corrected Rojas'rough transcript using the original interview in my extracts below,which include the YouTube timestamps[YT].

接下来是我对戴维斯与 Open Minds TV 的亚历杭德罗·罗哈斯的访谈的分析,访谈有音频形式,也有自动翻译的粗略文本。我已经用下面摘录的原始采访记录修改了罗哈斯的粗略文字稿,其中包括 YouTube 上的时间戳(YT)

In discussing the origins of the three videos showing UFO craft videotaped by Navy pilots in 2004 and 2015,and officially acknowledged as genuine by the Department of the Navy,Davis declares such advanced technology has not been developed by any government or nation:

在讨论这三段视频的起源时,戴维斯宣称这种先进技术还没有被任何政府或国家开发:

[29:28 YT]In a matter of three to five seconds,you're not basically talking about human technology.There is no Russian or Chinese or North Korean or Iranian or anybody else.No,NATO or any other Alliance,or non-Alliance country,non-Allied countries have any sort of technology that can perform the way these Tic Tacs were found to be performing….

[29:28 YT]在三到五秒的时间里,你基本上不是在谈论人类的技术。没有俄罗斯人、中国人、北朝鲜人、伊朗人或其他任何人。不,北约或任何其他联盟,或非联盟国家,非盟国有任何类型的技术,可以执行的方式,这些 Tic Tacs 被发现正在执行..

The things we're seeing are not shaped in the usual typical way that we humans would shape them.So you,you got to come up with another hypothesis and the only hypothesis is something unknown.And then its got a good chance that it's not human technology….

我们现在看到的东西并不是我们人类塑造它们的典型方式。所以你必须提出另一个假设,唯一的假设是未知的东西。然后它很有可能不是人类的技术..

Davis goes on to assert that the UFOs are operating on a new physics and humanity currently doesn't have the means to replicate this:

戴维斯继续断言,不明飞行物是在一种新的物理状态下运行的,人类目前没有办法复制这种状态:

[37:44 YT]In other words,they don't,the objects don't follow the aerodynamic rules of engineering.Okay,they just don't.Okay,and that's driven by physics.And they are not saying that they're breaking the laws of physics.So don't quote me on anything having to do with why they're operating on a new physics,we have an event,or no,they're breaking the laws of physics,it is possible to operating on the physics we haven't invented or haven't discovered yet.That's possible,we don't know.So anyway,the point is,is that these things are operating there you go way outside the envelope of our engineering and physics technologies.And,and I can guarantee you that no laws of physics are broken whatsoever.

换句话说,它们没有,物体没有遵循工程学中的空气动力学规律。好吧,他们就是不知道。好的,这是由物理学驱动的。他们并没有说他们违反了物理定律。所以,不要引用我的话来解释为什么他们在研究一种新的物理学,我们有一个事件,或者不,他们正在打破物理定律,我们有可能在我们还没有发明或者还没有发现的物理学上进行研究。这是有可能的,我们不知道。不管怎么说,关键是,这些东西在那里运作,远远超出了我们的工程和物理技术的范围。而且,我可以向你们保证,任何物理定律都不会被打破。

Davis declares that the UFOs and their advanced flight capacities are not something that can be manufactured given the present level of technological development on Earth:

戴维斯宣称,鉴于地球上目前的技术发展水平,不明飞行物及其先进的飞行能力是无法制造出来的:

[38:58 YT]And these things don't look like anything that we can manufacture on Earth.So we don't have the manufacturing or industrial technology for it.We don't have engineering for it.In other words,the blueprints and designs to get something…shaped like air fighter-sized piece of candy mouth mint and get that to fly through the air stably.And do the wonderful things that they do in the years reported by the F-18 pilots associated with the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group.

这些东西看起来不像我们能在地球上制造的任何东西。所以我们没有制造和工业技术。我们没有相应的工程设计。换句话说,蓝图和设计得到的东西...形状像空中战斗机大小的一块嘴薄荷,让它在空中稳定飞行。在尼米兹航空母舰打击群的 F-18飞行员报告的这些年里,他们做了很多了不起的事情。

Davis is then asked about the truth of reports of UFO crashes and whether the craft have been retrieved for classified studies.He answers:

随后,记者询问戴维斯关于 UFO 坠毁报道的真实性,以及飞船是否已被收回用于机密研究。他回答道:

[1:14:32 YT] Yeah,there have been crashes.The super powers on the Earth have had their share of crashes.And they have recovered the vehicles from their crashes.

是的,确实有车祸发生。地球上的超级大国也经历过各种各样的崩溃。他们已经从撞车事故中恢复了车辆。

Davis goes on to explain how the truth about classified studies of recovered alien spacecraft is kept from most public officials:

戴维斯接着解释了为什么大多数政府官员都不知道有关回收的外星飞船的机密研究的真相:

[1:15:30 YT]So yeah,they have that technology.We do too.And it's a very super sensitive topic.Because it's something that your listeners,you're probably going to be shocked at…probably a minute fraction,it's like less than 1/1000th or 1/100,000th of the people with the"need to know"access,"need to know"authorization,and security clearances to be involved with that type of work,are the only ones that know.The vast majority of the rest of the government really doesn't know.And that's why one hand,like the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing…

所以,是的,他们有这种技术。我们也是。这是一个非常敏感的话题。因为这是你的听众,你可能会感到震惊...可能只有很小的一部分,好像只有不到1/10001/100000的人知道"需要知道"的访问权限,"需要知道"的授权,和涉及这类工作的安全许可,是唯一知道的人。政府其他部门的绝大多数人真的不知道。这就是为什么一只手,就像右手不知道左手在做什么一样..

Davis was likely referring to the process whereby even senior military officials like Admiral Wilson,with high level security clearances and"need to know"authorization,was still denied access to classified studies of retrieved non-Earthly spacecraft.

戴维斯可能指的是,即使是像威尔逊上将这样的高级军事官员,由于拥有高级别的安全许可和"需要知道"的授权,仍然被拒绝进入对回收的非地球航天器的机密研究。

Davis elaborates on the complexity of the security clearances system in finding the truth about what's happening in unacknowledged special access programs:

戴维斯详细阐述了安全许可系统的复杂性,以查明在未被承认的特殊访问程序中发生的事情的真相:

[1:16:16 YT]Because of the stovepipe thing that goes on in compartmentalized programs…you just can't knock on doors and say,Hey,here's who I am…I got clearances,but not the right ones.I don't have a need to know.But I want to know,so can you tell me….You're going to be lied to,because that's,that's the rule.You don't want to tell the enemy anything,when this guy is knocking on your door asking you about UFO crashes,could be an asset for the Soviet Union or the Russian Federation,or the Chinese PLA,or the nincompoops over in Iran and North Korea and so forth.

[1:16:16 YT]因为在分割的项目中存在烟囱一样的问题......你不能挨家挨户地说,嘿,我就是这样的人......我有权限,但不是正确的。我不需要知道。但我想知道你能告诉我..。你会被骗,因为这是规矩。你不想告诉敌人任何事情----当这个家伙敲你的门询问关于 UFO 坠毁的事情----可能是苏联或者美国,或者中国人民解放军,或者在伊朗和朝鲜等地的傻瓜的资产。

So,you know,even if it's an American,you still don't want to answer that question because you don't know who they are.And you're not supposed to be revealing that information.So it takes a lot of hard tracking and digging after working.And it can take years and years and years.And then you develop the security clearances and the authorization for you to know that appropriately…allow you access to that information,then you find out hey,yeah,it's there,it's true.

所以,你知道,即使是一个美国人,你仍然不想回答这个问题,因为你不知道他们是谁。你不应该泄露这些信息。所以在工作之后需要大量的跟踪和挖掘。这可能需要一年又一年的时间。然后你开发出安全许可和授权,让你知道适当地...允许你访问那些信息,然后你发现,嘿,是的,它在那里,它是真的。

On the other hand,sometimes the information does come out on its own.But it doesn't come out in the way that UFOlogy likes to fantasize about it.It comes out only to specific people,who have specific talents or skills,who have security clearances,they may not have the need to know.But they could have the need to know if they were presented with that requirement.

另一方面,有时候信息会自己显示出来。但是它并不像 UFOlogy 喜欢幻想的那样出现。只有那些有特殊才能或技能,有安全许可的特定人员,他们可能没有必要知道。但是他们可能需要知道他们是否面临这样的要求。

At this stage in his interview,Davis comments on the Disclosure Project witnesses that Dr Steven Greer arranged to come forward in 2001 in a ground-breaking Press Conference.According to Davis,most of Greer's witnesses were crackpots and just"noise"when it came to identifying the genuine signal in the available public information on retrieved UFOs:

在这个阶段的采访中,戴维斯对"披露项目"的证人评论说,史蒂文·格里尔博士在2001年安排了一次突破性的新闻发布会。根据戴维斯的说法,大多数格里尔的目击者都是疯子,当涉及到辨认可获得的 ufo 公开信息中的真实信号时,他们只是"噪音":

[1:21:05 YT]A good majority of them were crackpots,they were phonies.But there was a small number of them that were the real deal.And so he successfully picked up a very small number of them,and got some information.And now,as to the veracity and quality of that information.That's another story.

他们中的大多数都是疯子,都是骗子。但是其中有一小部分是真的。所以他成功地抓住了其中的一小部分,并得到了一些信息。现在,关于这些信息的真实性和质量。那是另一回事了。

But he did get some interesting information.…the information was not…verifiable.In other words,once people looked into it,they said,yeah,this is realistic.Whereas a good chunk,a good chunk of his disclosure witnesses.You know,they had middle of the road guys,they had some information,but it was too purple.It was just anecdotal.

但他确实得到了一些有趣的信息。这些信息...无法证实。换句话说,一旦人们研究了这个问题,他们会说,是的,这是现实的。然而他的一大部分证人。你知道,他们有中间路线的人,他们有一些信息,但是太紫了。这只是传闻。

And then you had the guys that were real liars.He's got a chunk of liars out there…I don't know how much effort he spent on vetting any of those people.And I'm not going to name names of who they are.It's not important,because…the fact that they have no real information means it's noise.We're dealing with signal,we're interested in signal and science folks,not the noise.Check the noise.

还有那些真正的骗子。他有一大堆的骗子......我不知道他花了多少精力来审查这些人。我不会说出他们的名字。这并不重要,因为...事实上,他们没有真正的信息,这意味着它是噪音。我们处理的是信号,我们感兴趣的是信号和科学,而不是噪音。检查噪音。

Next,Davis went on to elaborate on Greer's witnesses who claimed to have first-hand knowledge of crash retrieval operations:

接下来,戴维斯详细说明了格里尔的目击者,这些目击者声称对坠机回收行动有第一手的了解:

[1:22:25 YT]So,he did have a small signal of people that had verifiable information….They came forward,they gave him information that was freely given to him.But it was after the fact,it was never expected that it could be acted upon.The people that gave him information…weren't directly involved with the crash retrieval at all.They actually were either peripheral,or they heard it from somebody reliable.So the vertical information was high quality,but they were not first-hand people.

[1:22:25 YT]所以,他确实发现了一个小信号,那就是人们拥有可证实的信息.....。他们挺身而出,给了他免费提供的信息。但是在事实发生之后,从来没有预料到它会被付诸行动。那些给他情报的人...根本没有直接参与搜救坠机事件。他们实际上要么是边缘人物,要么是从可靠的人那里听来的。所以纵向的信息质量很高,但他们不是第一手的人。

Davis is here suggesting,for example,that Clifford Stone,a 22 year US Army veteran,who was interviewed by Greer and claimed to have had first-hand knowledge of multiple crashed UFOs retrieved by the US military,was a crackpot and liar.There are many reasons to dispute Davis'information when it comes to Stone's testimony who has been successfully interviewed many times over several decades,and has maintained the same story with consistency and sincerity.

戴维斯在这里指出,例如,克利福德·斯通,一个22岁的美国陆军老兵,曾接受格里尔的采访,并声称拥有多个坠毁的不明飞行物的第一手知识,由美国军方找到,是一个疯子和说谎者。斯通的证词在过去的几十年里已经成功地被采访了许多次,并且一直保持着一致性和真诚性。

视频:https://youtu.be/1ZB0n-MTDVw

Davis provides no evidence that Stone or other Disclosure Projects witnesses are lying or crackpots,consequently his assertions need to be considered as unverified or misinformed.This is a major red flag that Davis testimony may be part of a "limited hangout"that is being unveiled to the American and World publics through the New York Times,arguably the most important media organ of the CIA and the Deep State.

戴维斯没有提供证据证明斯通或其他披露项目的证人在撒谎或疯子,因此他的断言需要被认为是未经证实或被误导。戴维斯的证词可能是通过《纽约时报》向美国和世界公众公布的一个"有限的环聊"的一部分,这是一个重大的危险信号。《纽约时报》可以说是中央情报局和深州最重要的媒体机构。

The most significant aspect of Davis's interview is his assertion that UFO crash retrievals were part of a small unsuccessful program that was terminated in 1989,around the time the famed whistleblower,Bob Lazar,emerged with his experiences claiming something very similar had occurred during his time at the S-4 facility at Area 51.

戴维斯采访中最重要的部分是他断言 UFO 坠毁回收是一个小型失败项目的一部分,该项目于1989年终止,当时著名的告密者鲍勃·拉扎尔出现,声称他在51区的 S-4设施期间曾发生过非常类似的事情。

To be continued in Part 2

待续于第2部分

来源:

https://exopolitics.org/what-was-revealed-in-classified-ufo-briefings-to-congress-pentagon/

  • 本文由 发表于 2020年8月3日09:51:36
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接