Something happens to the world's"really smart people"when the topic of debt is discussed:they become blabbering idiots.
Consider that last month we reported that according to the Institute of International Finance,global debt has now hit$250 trillion and is expected to rise to a record$255 trillion at the end of 2019,up$12 trillion from$243 trillion at the end of 2018,and nearly$32,500 for each of the 7.7 billion people on planet."With few signs of slowdown in the pace of debt accumulation,we estimate that global debt will surpass$255 trillion this year,"the IIF said in the report.
Separately,Bank of America recently calculated that since the collapse of Lehman,government debt has increased by$30tn,corporates debt by$25tn,household by$9tn,and financial debt by$2tn;And with central banks expected to support government debt,BofA warns that"the biggest recession risk is disorderly rise in credit spreads&corporate deleveraging."
另外，根据美国银行(Bank of America)最近的计算，自雷曼(Lehman)破产以来，美国政府债务增加了30万亿美元，企业债务增加了25万亿美元，家庭债务增加了9万亿美元，金融债务增加了2万亿美元
Where the"really smart people"come in,is the periodic return every couple of years of the naive assumption that despite this relentless increase in global debt,central banks can tighten financial conditions and the world can sustain higher interest rates.What ends up happening is that after a few quarters of"reflation"-which ironically and circularly is critical to inflate the debt away-markets realize that higher rates on this mountain of debt are unsustainable,risk assets tumble and central banks are forced to unleash another wave of easing,in the process further Japanifying first Europe,and then the entire world.
Only the"really smart people"they don't use simple logic like that,and instead they call it a"mysterious"(and relentless)decline in the r-star(r*),"equilibrium"or neutral rate of interest...
...which is basically another way of saying that as the world's massive debt mountain grows,the maximum possible interest rate shrinks with every passing year,something we first discussed in 2015 in"The Blindingly Simple Reason Why The Fed Is About To Engage In Policy Error",in which we showed that the equilibrium rate is a simple function of just two variables:total debt/GDP and nominal GDP growth.And in a world where GDP growth is shrinking and total debt growing,it logically means that r-star has nowhere to go but down.
...这基本上是另一种说法，即随着世界巨额债务山的增长，最大可能利率每年都在收缩，这是我们在2015年首次在《美联储为何要从事政策错误的盲目简单理由》中讨论的问题，其中我们表明，均衡利率只是两个变量的简单函数:总债务/GDP 和名义 GDP 增长。在一个 GDP 增长萎缩、债务总额增长的世界里，这理所当然地意味着 r-star 只能走下坡路。
Yet none of this is obvious to the"really smart people"and as a result,every so often we get another controlled'reflation'attempt which inevitably ends in a market dump just like Q4 2018 when rates rose too high-due to the latest failed attempt to normalize policy-and risk assets tumbled.What's even more troubling,every crisis has a lower and lower threshold rate as shown in the next chart.it also explains why the Fed could barely hike to 2.5%before it was forced to promptly cut 3 times...and launch QE 4.
A simple extrapolation of the declining trendline in the chart below suggests that the Fed's maximum interest rate will be 0%in just a few years.
Which brings us to the point where the"really smart people"become blabbering idiots.Because roughly at this time,instead of talking higher rates to stimulate the economy-which we just learned is no longer possible due to too much debt-the discussion turns to adding stimulating the economy....by adding even more debt.Not unironically,Bloomberg recently published an article titled"The Way Out for a World Economy Hooked On Debt?More Debt."That such garbage merits even a remotely serious consideration is for three reasons:i)the"really smart people"need a narrative that doesn't make them look like"really dumb people",ii)that reflation as a way out of the current debt crisis is no longer possible,and iii)because even greater idiocy in the form of MMT,i.e.,helicopter money,is gaining serious consideration among the world's politicians(and even finance professionals),and may well become the dominant financial paradigm after the next crisis,a crisis which will then inevitably end with the long-overdue collapse of fiat currencies,because while central banks can't orchestrate a controlled increase in 1 or 2%without losing control of risk assets,they can certainly bring about an uncontrolled hyperinflation once the world finally loses faith in the prevailing monetary orthodoxy.
这就把我们带到了"真正聪明的人"变成胡扯的白痴的地步。因为大约在这个时候，我们不再谈论提高利率以刺激经济——我们刚刚了解到，由于债务过多，不再可能提高利率——而是转向增加刺激经济的措施.....。通过增加更多的债务。不无讽刺意味的是，布隆伯格最近发表了一篇题为《世界经济如何摆脱债务困境？更多的债务。"这些垃圾甚至值得认真考虑，原因有三:一)"真正聪明的人"需要一个不会让他们看起来像"真正愚蠢的人"的故事;二)通货再膨胀作为摆脱当前债务危机的一种方式已经不再可能;三)因为以 MMT 形式出现的更愚蠢的行为，即。直升机货币，正在获得认真的考虑，在世界的政治家(甚至金融专业人士)，并很可能成为主要的金融范例后，下一次危机，这场危机将不可避免地结束与长期拖延的法定货币崩溃，因为虽然中央银行不能精心安排1或2%的控制增长，而不失去对风险资产的控制，他们当然可以带来失控的恶性通货膨胀，一旦世界最终失去信心的主流货币正统。
And while the"really smart people"sound like absolute idiots once the unsolvable topic of debt comes around,it doesn't mean that they can't issue an occasional warning that it's all going to end in ruins.
That's what the World Bank did last week when it joined the BIS(the'central banks'central bank'is perhaps most notable for the fact that not a single central bank actually listens to its recommendations)in warning that the largest and fastest rise in global debt in half a century could lead to another financial crisis as the world economy slows.
In a report titled"Global Waves of Debt",the world bank looked at the four major episodes of debt increases that have occurred in more than 100 countries since 1970—the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s,the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s and the global financial crisis from 2007 to 2009.
世界银行在一份题为《全球债务浪潮》(Global Waves of Debt)的报告中，研究了1970年以来100多个国家出现的四次主要债务增长:上世纪80年代的拉美债务危机、上世纪90年代末的亚洲金融危机和2007年至2009年的全球金融危机。
While not finding anything the IIF didn't already point out last month,the bank said during the fourth wave,from 2010 to 2018,the debt to GDP ratio of developing countries has risen by more than half to 168%:that was a faster increase on an annual basis than during the Latin American debt crisis.
And,as the IIF found previously,the rise in debt has been across both private companies and governments across the world,amplifying the risks if there is another global financial crisis.As a reminder,this is what global debt looked like 20 years ago....
...and what it looks like today:
Something else the World Bank found that we already know:debt growth in the past decade was mostly concentrated in China which accounted for the bulk of the increase,with its debt-to-GDP ratio rising by nearly three-quarters to 255%since 2010,now totaling more than$20 trillion.
Of course,it's not just China,as most emerging economies saw their debt rise over the eight years,and especially in the past 12 months.
With common knowledge out of the way,the World Bank report said the latest wave of debt was more challenging than the previous three waves because of the build up of both private and public debt,new types of creditors including foreign investors and the big rise in borrowing,which was global and not limited to one or two regions.Poorer countries have also increasingly borrowed from non-traditional lenders such as China,which offer less favorable loan conditions,including higher interest rates and requiring stakes in projects as collateral,according to ABC .
Trump's appointee to the World Bank,David Malpass,said governments needed to strengthen their economic policies to make their countries less vulnerable to financial shocks:"It underscores why debt management and transparency need to be top priorities for policymakers—so they can increase growth and investment and ensure that the debt they take on contributes to better development outcomes for the people,"he said.
"The size,speed,and breadth of the latest debt wave should concern us all",the report noted.
The irony,is that even in its warning,the World Bank failed to isolate the root of the problem:the report said low interest rates globally reduced the risk of a crisis for the time being,which is true;it is also the main factor enabling governments around the world to issue another wave of debt layering even more debt upon debt,and prompting Bloomberg articles explaining how only more debt can""solve a debt crisis.
Even so,the World Bank's vice president for equitable growth,finance and institutions Ceyla Pazarbasioglu said the dangers were building up.
"History shows that large debt surges often coincide with financial crises in developing countries,at great cost to the population,"she said.
The report focused on total developed nation debt,which remained near the record levels reached in the aftermath of the global financial crisis,at around 265%of GDP in 2018,or$US130 trillion:"While government debt has risen,to a high of 104 per cent of GDP($US50 trillion),private sector debt has fallen slightly amid deleveraging in some sectors.Total debt has fallen since 2010 in two-fifths of advanced economies,"the report said.
这份报告的重点是发达国家的债务总额，2018年，发达国家的债务总额约为 GDP 的265%，即130万亿美元，接近全球金融危机后达到的创纪录水平:"尽管政府债务已经上升，达到 GDP 的104%(50万亿美元)的高点，但随着一些部门的去杠杆化，私营部门的债务略有下降。自2010年以来，五分之二的发达经济体的债务总额有所下降。"。
Of course,none of this is new:the World Bank and the IMF-which on one hand have been enabling the world's rush into more debt-have paradoxically also been warning for some years about the build up of global debt since the GFC.
Amusingly,according to some analysts,the World Bank report"has upped the pressure on governments to prevent another debt crisis"as it found that of 519 cases of debt surges in 100 emerging and developing countries since 1970 roughly half ended in financial crises.
Malpass called on governments to improve management of their debts to lower borrowing costs and said both governments and creditors needed to be more transparent about loans.
"Emerging and developing economies already are more vulnerable on a variety of fronts than they were ahead of the last crisis,"he said."75 per cent of them now have budget deficits,their foreign currency denominated corporate debt is significantly higher,and their current account deficits are four times as large as they were in 2007."Under these circumstances,a sudden rise in risk premiums could precipitate a financial crisis,as has happened many times in the past."
Which is why central banks can never allow a"sudden rise in risk premiums."
Which is why interest rates can never be allowed to rise again.
Which is why the can must be kicked at all costs,and why debt growth will only accelerate.
Which is why the"really smart people"will keep repeating the same idiotic drivel until the next crisis finally hits.
Which is why the next crisis may be the last.