COVID-19死亡率|人类历史上最严重的误算-流行病学博士研究生

2020年9月5日11:01:59COVID-19死亡率|人类历史上最严重的误算-流行病学博士研究生已关闭评论 430 9656字阅读32分11秒
摘要

来自加拿大安大略省滑铁卢大学的 Ronald b.Brown 博士说,根据他的研究,冠状病毒的致死率代表了”人类历史上最严重的误判”

事实:来自加拿大安大略省滑铁卢大学的 Ronald b.Brown 博士说,根据他的研究,冠状病毒的致死率代表了"人类历史上最严重的误判"

反思:为什么这篇文章中提到的观点和证据从未在大型媒体上曝光?为什么有那么多其他信息和数据明显与之相反,我们却以一种特定的感知/叙事方式被播送?

What Happened:Ronald B.Brown,Ph.D.,from the School of Public health and Health Systems at the University of Waterloo,Canada,recently stated that the COVID-19 fatality rate is the"worst miscalculation in the history of humanity."Brown is currently completing his second doctorate degree this time in epidemiology at the University of Waterloo.

事件:Ronald b.Brown,加拿大滑铁卢大学公共卫生与卫生系统学院的博士,最近声称COVID-19死亡率是"人类历史上最严重的误算"布朗目前正在滑铁卢大学完成他的第二个流行病学博士学位。

Not long ago,Brown published a paper in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness,titled"Public health lessons learned from biases in coronavirus mortality overestimation."

不久前,布朗在《灾难医学与公共卫生准备》上发表了一篇题为《从冠状病毒死亡率高估的偏差中吸取的公共卫生教训》的论文

In the paper he provides data and information he collected from his research,he compared informational texts from the World Health Organization(WHO)and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC)to data from independent scientists and Congressional testimony.He states that"Results of this critical appraisal reveal information bias and selection bias in coronavirus mortality overestimation,most likely caused by misclassifying an influenza infection fatality rate as a case fatality rate."

在这篇论文中,他提供了从他的研究中收集的数据和信息,他比较了来自世界卫生组织(WHO)和疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的信息文本,以及来自独立科学家和国会证词的数据。他指出:"这一严格评估的结果揭示了冠状病毒死亡率过高估计中的信息偏差和选择偏差,很可能是由于将流感感染死亡率错误地归类为病死率病毒引起的。"

Below is a statement Brown recently gave to John C.A.Manley,a journalist who was the first to cover the story:

以下是布朗最近给第一个报道这个故事的记者约翰·c·a·曼利的一份声明:

The subject of this article is disruptive,to say the least,although it is not as obvious from the title.The manuscript cites the smoking-gun,documented evidence showing that the public's overreaction to the coronavirus pandemic was based on the worst miscalculation in the history of humanity,in my opinion.My manuscript underwent an intensive peer-review process.You are the first media guy who has responded to my invitation.

这篇文章的主题是破坏性的,至少可以这么说,尽管从标题来看不是那么明显。手稿引用了确凿的证据,文件证据表明,公众对冠状病毒流行的过度反应是基于人类历史上最严重的错误估计,在我看来。我的手稿经历了一个密集的同行评议过程。你是第一个回应我邀请的媒体人。

Dr.Brown added that CDC and WHO documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to the coronavirus,implying that the lockdowns were pointless.His paper questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did not"receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19."

博士补充说,CDC WHO 的文件显示,病死率流感病毒与冠状病毒类似,这意味着封锁是毫无意义的。他的论文质疑为什么2017-2018年美国流感季节没有像新型冠状病毒肺炎一样得到媒体的密集报道

He points out that"the accuracy of coronavirus tests rushed into production during the pandemic were unknown."And he explores how the media began focusing on an increase in coronavirus cases while ignoring the decrease in death rates.

他指出,"年大流行期间匆忙投入生产的冠状病毒测试的准确性是未知的。"他还探讨了媒体是如何开始关注冠状病毒病例的增加而忽略了死亡率的下降。

The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is"scientifically meaningless."They cite an article explaining the science.You can read more about that here.

保加利亚病理学协会的立场是,用于确定病人体内的新冠状病毒的检测是"没有科学意义的"他们引用了一篇解释科学的文章。你可以在这里了解更多。

Why This Is Important.Dr.Brown is not the only one raising these points,yet it seems nobody really knows these facts because they are constantly ignored by mainstream media,who is simply presenting us with one perspective that doesn't seemed to be based on science and data at all in my opinion.It makes one wonder,what's really going on here?

为什么这很重要。布朗博士并不是唯一一个提出这些观点的人,但似乎没有人真正知道这些事实,因为它们一直被主流媒体所忽视,而主流媒体只是向我们展示了一个在我看来似乎完全不是基于科学和数据的观点。这让人想知道,这里到底发生了什么?

Why are deaths not a result of the coronavirus being marked as coronavirus deaths,even when it's clear that that the coronavirus was not the cause?This has been observed across the globe.

为什么死亡不是冠状病毒标记为冠状病毒致死的结果,即使很明显冠状病毒不是致死原因?全世界都在观察这一现象。

A number of the world's doctors and top experts in the field have been raising their concern with regards to the measures taken to combat the novel coronavirus.For example,Michael Levitt,a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University recently criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the pandemic.You can read more about that here.

世界上许多医生和这一领域的顶级专家都对为打击新型冠状病毒而采取的措施表示关注。例如,生物物理学家、斯坦福大学结构生物学教授迈克尔·莱维特最近批评世界卫生组织和 Facebook 审查关于这场流行病的不同信息和知情观点。你可以在这里了解更多。

More than 500 German doctors&scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the"Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee"to investigate what's happening on our planet with regards to COVID-19,expressing the same sentiment.They came together to investigate the severity of the virus,and whether or not the actions taken by governments around the world,and in this case the German government,are justified and not causing more harm than good.

超过500名德国医生和科学家作为代表签署了一个组织称为"科罗纳议会外调查委员会",以调查我们的星球上发生了什么关于新型冠状病毒肺炎,表达了同样的观点。他们聚集在一起调查病毒的严重性,以及世界各国政府----这次是德国政府----所采取的行动是否合理,是否弊大于利。

This group has been giving multiple conferences in Germany,in one of the most recent,Dr.Heiko Schöning,one of the organizations leaders,stated that"We have a lot of evidence that it(the new coronavirus)is a fake story all over the world."To put it in context,he wasn't referring to the virus being fake,but simply that it's no more dangerous than the seasonal flu(or just as dangerous)and that there is no justification for the measures being taken to combat it.You can read more about the story here.

这个组织已经在德国举办了多次会议,最近的一次会议上,该组织的领导人之一海科·舒宁(Heiko Schöning)博士表示,"我们有很多证据表明,它(新型冠状病毒)在全世界都是假的。"他并不是说这种病毒是假的,只是说它并不比季节性流感更危险(或者说同样危险),而且没有由采取措施来对抗它。你可以在这里阅读更多的故事。

Another example would be a recent report published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus.

另一个例子是最近发表在《英国医学杂志》上的一份报告,该报告指出,由于新型冠状病毒的出现,英国采取的隔离措施可能已经导致更多的英国老年人死亡,超过了冠状病毒高峰期的死亡人数。

Reported case fatality rates,like the original official 3.4%rate from the World Health Organization,caused horror,panic and hysteria and were also meaningless.

报告的病死率,就像世界卫生组织最初的官方数据3.4%一样,引起了恐惧、恐慌和歇斯底里,也毫无意义。

Many scientists and doctors in North America are also expressing the same sentiments.For example,The Physicians For Informed Consent(PIC)recently published a report titled"Physicians for Informed Consent(PIC)Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods."According to them,the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%.You can read more about that and access their resources and reasoning here.

北美的许多科学家和医生也表达了同样的观点。例如,医生征求知情同意协会(PIC)最近发表了一篇题为《医生征求知情同意协议》(PIC)的报告,比较了前几个季节性和大流行性流感时期的新型冠状病毒肺炎根据他们的统计,新型冠状病毒肺炎的感染率/死亡率为0.26%。你可以在这里阅读更多关于这方面的内容,并访问他们的资源和推理。

Dr.Sucharit Bhakdi,a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history is also part of Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee mentioned above and has also expressed the same thing,multiple times early on in the pandemic all the way up to today.

微生物学专家、德国历史上被引用次数最多的研究科学家之一苏哈里特·巴克迪博士也是上文提到的科罗纳议会外调查委员会的成员,并且在流行病早期一直到今天的许多次中都表达了同样的观点。

Implementation of the current draconian measures that are so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly,exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us.Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19?I assert that the answer is simply,no.–Bhakdi.You can read more about him here.

只有在有理由担心一种真正的、异常危险的病毒正在威胁我们的情况下,才有理由执行目前极端限制基本权利的严厉措施。是否存在任何科学上可靠的数据来支持这一新型冠状病毒肺炎的论点?我断言答案很简单,不。巴克迪。你可以在这里了解更多关于他的信息。

John P.A.Ioannidis,a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate"is close to 0 percent"for people under the age of 45 years old.You can read more about that here.He and several other academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggest that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza,and published their reasoning in a study last month.You can find that study and read more about that story here.

斯坦福大学(Stanford University)医学和流行病学教授约翰·p·a·埃尼迪斯(John p.a.Ioannidis)表示,45岁以下人群的感染死亡率"接近0%"。你可以在这里了解更多。他和斯坦福大学医学院的其他几位学者认为,新型冠状病毒肺炎的感染死亡率与季节性流感相似,并在上个月的一项研究中发表了他们的推论。你可以在这里找到这项研究,了解更多关于这个故事的信息。

This list goes on,and on,and on,and on..So why don't we hear anything about it?Why are scientists,doctors and experts being heavily censored for sharing this information?Why are media outlets like us being punished and demonetized for writing about it?What's going on here?Is there another agenda at play?Is NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden right about the fact that governments are using this pandemic to place more measures upon the population that take away our rights,all under the guise of good will?Why haven't these measures been taken for other respiratory viruses that infect just as many,and kill just as many people and more than Covid-19 every single year?

这个名单还在继续,继续,继续,继续。.那为什么我们什么都没听到呢?为什么科学家、医生和专家因为分享这些信息而受到严格审查?为什么像我们这样的媒体机构会因为报道此事而受到惩罚和被妖魔化?这是怎么回事?是否还有其他议程在起作用?美国国家安全局的告密者爱德华·斯诺登是否说对了,政府正在利用这种流行病,在善意的伪装下,对民众采取更多措施,剥夺我们的权利?为什么没有针对其他呼吸道病毒采取这些措施,这些病毒每年感染同样多的人,并且每年杀死同样多的人和新型冠状病毒肺炎?

These are important questions to ask and have a discussion around,especially when our right to even speak is slowly being taken away.

这些都是需要提出并进行讨论的重要问题,尤其是在我们甚至连发言权都被慢慢剥夺的情况下。

Facebook fact-checkers have made it quite clear that any information that does not come from the WHO or federal health regulatory agencies should not be considered as reliable.

Facebook 的事实调查员已经明确表示,任何不是来自世界卫生组织或联邦卫生监管机构的信息都不应被视为可靠。

外延

Why is there so much information being shared that completely contradicts the narrative of our federal health regulatory agencies and organizations like the WHO?Is there a battle for our perception happening right now?Is our consciousness being manipulated?Why is there so much conflicting information if everything is crystal clear?Why are alternative treatments that have shown tremendous amounts of success being completely ignored and ridiculed?What's going on here,and how much power do governments have when they are able to silence the voice of so many people?Should we not be examining information openly,transparently,and together?

为什么有这么多的信息被共享,完全违背了我们的联邦卫生监管机构和组织,如世界卫生组织的叙述?现在是否正在进行一场关于我们感知力的战斗?我们的意识是被操纵的吗?如果一切都很清楚,为什么会有这么多相互矛盾的信息?为什么那些取得了巨大成功的替代疗法却被完全忽视和嘲笑?这里到底发生了什么,当政府能够压制这么多人的声音时,他们又有多大的权力呢?难道我们不应该公开、透明地共同检查信息吗?

Is the new coronavirus,like 9/11,a catalyst for a shift in human consciousness.Are people'waking up'as a result of what has,is and will transpire?

9/11,这样的新型冠状病毒,是人类意识转变的催化剂吗。人们"觉醒"是已经、现在和将要发生的事情的结果吗?

来源:

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/08/28/covid-19-fatality-rate-worst-miscalculation-in-human-history-phd-student-in-epidemiology/

  • 本文由 发表于 2020年9月5日11:01:59
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接