历史气候学家蒂姆•鲍尔博士对97%共识的看法:“完全错误,是故意制造出来的”

2019年8月5日16:57:44历史气候学家蒂姆•鲍尔博士对97%共识的看法:“完全错误,是故意制造出来的”已关闭评论 520 6180字阅读20分36秒
摘要

人们已经持怀疑态度,因为他们知道天气预报,尤其是超过48小时的天气预报,总是错误的,所以今天更多的人明白,全球变暖的说法没有实质内容,而且它是基于腐败的科学。

Canadian climate scientist Dr.Tim Ball recently published a new book on climate science:The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science.What follows later(below)is a short interview with Dr.Ball.

加拿大气候科学家蒂姆•鲍尔博士最近出版了一本关于气候科学的新书:。接下来(下面)是对鲍尔博士的简短采访。

"Government propaganda"…"corrupt science"

"政府宣传"..."腐败的科学"

In the book Ball writes that the failed predictions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC),coupled with failed alarmist stories such as the complete loss of Arctic sea ice by 2013,are making the public increasingly skeptical of government propaganda about global warming.

鲍尔在书中写道,政府间气候变化专门委员会政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的预测失败,加上一些危言耸听的故事失败,例如到2013年北极海冰完全消失,使得公众越来越怀疑政府的宣传。

People were already skeptical because they knew weather forecasts,especially beyond forty-eight hours,were invariably wrong,and so today more people understand there is no substance to global warming claims and that it is based on corrupt science.

人们已经持怀疑态度,因为他们知道天气预报,尤其是超过48小时的天气预报,总是错误的,所以今天更多的人明白,全球变暖的说法没有实质内容,而且它是基于腐败的科学。

Now they are asking:Who perpetrated the deception and could a small group of people deceive the world?

现在他们在问:是谁制造了这个骗局,一小群人能欺骗世界吗?

历史气候学家蒂姆•鲍尔博士对97%共识的看法:“完全错误,是故意制造出来的”

In his book The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science,Dr.Ball explains who did it and why.

在他的书中,鲍尔博士解释了是谁干的以及为什么。

Ball was among the earlier dissidents and as a result he became the target of media articles and false information promoted by a scurrilous website funded by a chairman of a large environmental foundation.He was a real threat because they couldn't say he wasn't qualified.

鲍尔是早期的持不同政见者之一,结果他成为媒体文章和虚假信息的目标,这些文章和信息是由一家大型环保基金会的主席资助的下流网站发布的。他是一个真正的威胁,因为他们不能说他不够格。

Dr.Ball has been the subject of three lawsuits from a lawyer operating in British Columbia.For the first one,he decided to avoid the expense of a challenge and so he withdrew what he had written.

鲍尔博士已经成为不列颠哥伦比亚省一名律师提起的三起诉讼的对象。对于第一个问题,他决定避免一个挑战的费用,所以他撤回了他写的东西。

Then,within nine days,he received two more from the same lawyer suing for defamation because of harsh criticism he made of a climate scientist.At that point,he and his family decided they had to fight back.

然后,九天之内,他又收到同一位律师的两封信,起诉他诽谤,理由是他对一位气候科学家进行了严厉批评。在那时,他和他的家人决定他们必须反击。

As Ball carries on his legal battle he maintains that climate deception continues and that the public is paying a high price for completely unnecessary energy and economic policies based on the pseudoscience of the IPCC.Not to mention the social devastation of communities devastated by job losses.

在鲍尔继续他的法律斗争时,他坚持认为气候欺骗仍在继续,公众正在为政府间气候变化专门委员会基于伪科学的完全不必要的能源和经济政策付出高昂代价。更不用说失业给社区带来的社会灾难了。

"Their last effective chance"

"他们最后的有效机会"

Dr.Balls say the rhetoric and stream of misinformation increases as the perpetrators,now including the Pope,build up to their last effective chance to influence an increasingly skeptical world.When the Global Warming theme failed,they tried Climate Change.

鲍尔斯博士说,随着包括教皇在内的犯罪者积累到最后一次有效的机会来影响这个越来越多疑的世界,他们的言辞和错误信息的源源不断地增加。当全球变暖主题失败后,他们尝试了。

The Climate Change theme has failed,so now they are trying Climate Disruption as defined by Obama's science Czar,John Holdren—all to justify expensive government programs.

气候变化的主题已经失败,所以现在他们正在尝试奥巴马的科学沙皇约翰·霍尔德伦(JohnHoldren)所定义的气候破坏——所有这一切都是为了证明昂贵的政府项目是正。

The impetus for a global carbon tax and global governance represent the central theme of a climate conference scheduled for Paris in December 2015,the United Nations Climate Change Conference or COP21.

全球碳税和全球治理的推动力是定于201512月在巴黎举行的联合国气候变化会议(简称COP21)的中心主题。

Interview

采访

视频:https://youtu.be/SQFCKICwFEQ

What follows are some questions that Dr.Ball kindly answered:

以下是鲍尔博士亲切回答的一些问题:

What scientific reason do you think CO2's role is far less?

你认为二氧化碳的作用远远小于其作用的科学原因是什么?

Water vapor is 95%of the total greenhouse gases by volume,while CO2 is approximately 4%.The human portion is only 3.4%of the total CO2.They try to claim CO2 is more effective,but it's a false claim called"climate sensitivity".The number the IPCC use for sensitivity has constantly declined and will reach zero.

水蒸气的体积占温室气体总量的95%。人类只占总二氧化碳的3.4%。他们试图声称二氧化碳更有效,但这是一个被称为"气候敏感性"的虚假声明。政府间气候变化专门委员会用于敏感性的数字一直在下降,而且将趋于零。

What factor has been the most responsible for the warming over the past 25 years?

在过去的25年里,是什么因素导致了全球变暖?

The same factor as it has always been,changes in the sun.The IPCC dismiss the sun because they only look at variation in radiative output,but that is only one of three ways the Sun affects global climate.

同样的因素一直存在,太阳的变化。联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会排除了太阳,因为他们只关注辐射输出的变化,但这只是太阳影响全球气候的三种方式之一。

What do you think the global temperature will do over the next few decades?

你认为全球气温在未来几十年会有什么变化?

Decline.The major short-term control of global temperature is variation in the strength of the Sun's magnetic field.

衰退。全球气温的主要短期控制是太阳磁场强度的变化。

As it varies it determines the amount of cosmic radiation reaching the Earth.The cosmic radiation creates cloud in the lower atmosphere and it,like a shutter in the greenhouse it determines the sunlight reaching the surface and therefore the temperature.

随着它的变化,它决定了到达地球的宇宙辐射量。宇宙辐射在低层大气中形成云层,就像温室里的百叶窗一样,它决定了到达地表的阳光,从而决定了温度。

What do you think of the claimed"97%consensus"?

你觉得那个声称的""怎么样?

It is completely false and was deliberately manufactured by John Cook at the University of Queensland.There are more detailed analyses of the corruption but this is the best layman's account.www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/.

它是完全错误的,是由昆士兰大学的JohnCook故意制造的。有更多关于腐败的详细分析,但这是外行人最好的解释。.

Dr Tim Ball,PhD is also the author of Human Caused Global Warming:The Biggest Deception in History

博士同时也是

On a scale of 1 to 10,how honest have the major climate institutes been with the public?

110,主要的气候研究机构对公众的诚实程度如何?

-10.If they knew what was wrong it is deliberate and criminal.If they didn't know they are grossly incompetent.

-10.如果他们知道什么是错误的,这是蓄意的和犯罪的。如果他们不知道自己非常无能的话。

Other comments by Dr.Ball:

博士的其他评论:

The biggest problem for the public is they can't believe that an apparent majority of scientists seem to support the IPCC science.The simple answer is,very few are familiar with the science.They,like most of the public,assume other scientists would not distort,manipulate,or do anything other than proper science.

公众面临的最大问题是,他们无法相信竟然有明显多数的科学家支持IPCC的科学观点。简单的答案是,很少有人熟悉这门科学。他们和大多数公众一样,认为其他科学家不会歪曲、操纵或做任何非正规科学的事情。

When scientists find out,they are shocked,as exemplified in German meteorologist Klaus-Eckert Puls's comment:

当科学家们发现时,他们感到震惊,例如德国气象学家的评论:

"Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us.One day I started checking the facts and data—first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements.To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it."

"10年前,我只是照搬IPCC的说法。有一天,我开始核实事实和数据ーー开始时我有点怀疑,但后来我发现IPCC和媒体告诉我们的很多东西纯粹是胡说八道,甚至没有任何科学事实和测量数据支持,我感到愤怒。直到今天,作为一名科学家,我仍然感到羞耻,因为我在没有事先检查的情况下就做了他们的科学报告。"

Reference:Notrickszone.com

来源:http://humansarefree.com/2019/08/historical-climatologist-dr-tim-ball-on.html

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2019年8月5日16:57:44
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接