事实:一项新的研究概述了一种仓促的疫苗是如何使大流行变得更糟的。
反思:我们所有的疫苗都经过适当的安全测试吗？为什么它们是无责任的产品？为什么这么多科学家提出的担忧被主流媒体完全忽视，而一种仓促推出的冠状病毒疫苗却不是？
What Happened:A paper recently published in The Lancet titled"Covid-19 vaccine trials should seek worthwhile efficacy"states the following:
发生了什么:最近发表在《柳叶刀》杂志上的一篇题为《2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗试验应该寻求有价值的疗效》的论文指出:
Deployment of a weakly effective vaccine could actually worsen the COVID-19 pandemic if authorities wrongly assume it causes a substantial reduction in risk,or if vaccinated individuals wrongly believe they are immune,hence reducing implementation of,or compliance with,other COVID-19 control measures.Deployment of a marginally effective vaccine could also interfere with the evaluation of other vaccines,as subsequent vaccines would then have to be compared with it rather than with a placebo.
如果当局错误地认为疫苗可以大幅度降低风险，或者如果接种者错误地认为他们具有免疫力，从而减少了其他2019冠状病毒疾病控制措施的实施或遵守情况，那么部署一种效果不佳的疫苗实际上可能会使2019冠状病毒疾病大流行病进一步恶化。部署一种效力不大的疫苗也可能干扰其他疫苗的评估，因为随后的疫苗将不得不与之比较，而不是与安慰剂。
The paper also points out that"There is a danger that political and economic pressures for rapid introduction of a COVID-19 vaccine could lead to widespread deployment of a vaccine that is in reality only weakly effective(eg,reducing COVID-19 incidence by only 10–20%),perhaps because of a misleadingly promising result from an underpowered trial."
这篇论文还指出，"政治和经济压力可能会导致2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗的广泛应用，而这种疫苗实际上效果很差(例如，2019冠状病毒疾病的发病率仅降低10-20%)，这可能是因为一个效果不佳的试验得出了令人误解的结果。"
Why This Is Important:The race for a coronavirus vaccine has highlighted how science has become extremely politicized.Dr.Marcia Angell,a physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal(NEMJ),also considered one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world,alongside The Lancet,stated the following for that precise reason:
为什么这很重要:冠状病毒疫苗的竞争已经突出了科学已经变得极端政治化。内科医生、《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEMJ)长期主编玛西娅·安吉尔(Marcia Angell)博士也被认为是世界上最负盛名的同行评议医学期刊之一，与《柳叶刀》(The Lancet)一样，她为了这个确切的原因发表了以下声明:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.I take no pleasure in this conclusion,which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine."(source)
"我们再也不可能相信已经发表的许多临床研究，也不可能依赖值得信赖的医生的判断或权威的医学指南。作为《新英格兰医学杂志》(The New England Journal of Medicine)的编辑，我慢慢地、不情愿地得出了这个结论。"(来源)
The corruption is never-ending when it comes to the link between corporations,politics and government agencies.In fact,only a few years ago,more than a dozen scientists from within the CDC put out an anonymous public statement detailing the influence corporations have on government policies.They were referred to as the Spider Papers.
当涉及到公司、政治和政府机构之间的联系时，腐败是永无止境的。事实上，就在几年前，疾病控制与预防中心的十几位科学家发表了一份匿名的公开声明，详细说明了企业对政府政策的影响。他们被称为蜘蛛文件。
We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency.It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests.It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders.What concerns us most,is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviours.Others see it and turn the other way.Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behaviour.It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units.These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.We would like to see high ethical standards and thoughtful,responsible management restored at CDC.We are asking that you do your part to help clean up this house!
我们是疾病预防控制中心的一群科学家，他们非常关注我们机构目前的道德状况。我们的使命似乎受到外部势力和流氓利益集团的影响和左右。看来，我们的使命和国会对我们机构的意图被我们的一些领导人规避了。我们最关心的是，它正在成为一种规范，而不是罕见的例外。疾病预防控制中心的一些高级管理人员清楚地意识到甚至宽恕这些行为。其他人看到了这一点，转向另一个方向。一些员工受到恐吓，被迫做一些他们知道不对的事情。我们有来自整个机构的代表见证了这种不可接受的行为。它发生在所有层次和我们各自的单位。这些可疑和不道德的做法有可能损害我们作为公共卫生领域值得信赖的领导者的信誉和声誉。我们希望看到疾病预防控制中心恢复高道德标准和周到、负责任的管理。我们请求你们尽你们的一份力量来帮助清理这所房子！
Mainstream media outlets are picking up on the desire for a rushed vaccine and blaming Donald Trump.But this isn't because of the dangers of a rushed vaccine,it's simply to make the president look bad.That's politics,two different politicians could be pushing for the same thing,but how it's portrayed and beamed into the minds of the masses via mainstream media may be different depending on their political/corporate affiliations.
主流媒体对匆忙研制疫苗的渴望愈演愈烈，并指责唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)。但这并不是因为匆忙接种疫苗的危险性，而只是为了让总统难堪。这就是政治----两个不同的政治家可能会推动同一件事情，但是通过主流媒体向大众传播的方式可能会根据他们的政治/企业背景而有所不同。
Here's an article from the New York Times regarding Gerald Ford and his rushed vaccine.CNN recently published an article titled"Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be'colossally stupid.'
这里有一篇来自《纽约时报》的文章，是关于杰拉尔德·福特和他的紧急疫苗的。美国有线电视新闻网最近发表了一篇题为"过去的疫苗灾难显示，为什么现在仓促开发冠状病毒疫苗是'极其愚蠢的'。"
To paint vaccines in any type of harmful light is something we don't really see from mainstream media.Perhaps there are going to be multiple vaccines here?One that is rushed and demonized by mainstream media,and another to follow that is praised,both most likely being colossal money makers.
在任何有害的光线下描绘疫苗，我们在主流媒体上是看不到的。也许这里会有多种疫苗？一个是被主流媒体匆忙妖魔化的，另一个是被赞扬的，两者都很可能是巨大的赚钱机器。
But the question,are vaccines safe and effective in general?
但问题是，疫苗总体上是否安全有效？
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury(NCVIA)has already paid out approximately$4 billion to compensate families of vaccine injured children.As astronomical as the monetary awards are,they're even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1%of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System(VAERS).If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct–only 1%of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated–then up to 99%of vaccine injuries go unreported.
全国儿童疫苗受伤(NCVIA)已经支付了大约40亿美元，以补偿接种疫苗受伤儿童的家庭。尽管金额巨大，但考虑到卫生和公众服务部声称只有约1%的疫苗伤害报告给了疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)，这个数字更加令人担忧。如果 VAERS 和 HHS 的数字是正确的——只有1%的疫苗伤害被报告，只有1/3的请愿得到补偿——那么高达99%的疫苗伤害没有被报告。
Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients,and 1.4 million doses(of 45 different vaccines)were given to 376,452 individuals.Of these doses,35,570 possible reactions(2.6 percent of vaccinations)were identified.This is an average of 890 possible events,an average of 1.3 events per clinician,per month.This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.(source)
从2006年6月至2009年10月收集了715000名患者的初步数据，并向376452人注射了140万剂(45种不同的疫苗)。在这些剂量中，确定了35,570种可能的反应(2.6%的疫苗接种)。这是平均890个可能事件，平均每个临床医生每月1.3个事件。这些数据是在2009年 AMIA 会议上公布的。(来源)
This completely contradicts the CDC's claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines.
这与疾病控制中心宣称的1/100万人因接种疫苗而受伤的说法完全相反。
Recent Articles Published Regarding Vaccine Efficacy In General:
最近发表的关于疫苗效果的文章:
Landmark FDA Paper On Aluminum Safety In Vaccines
具有里程碑意义的 FDA 关于疫苗中铝安全性的论文
RFK Jr.&Children's Health Defense Sue University of California For Making Flu Shot Mandatory
小 RFK 和儿童健康保护组织起诉加利福尼亚大学强制注射流感疫苗
Biochemical Engineer Drops Bombshell Facts About Measles&The MMR Vaccine In Washington
生化工程师在华盛顿揭露麻疹和 MMR 先生疫苗的爆炸性事实
US Gov&Yale Hold Clinical Trials To Test"Persuasive Messages For COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake"
美国政府和耶鲁大学举行临床试验测试"2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗接种的说服性信息"
81%of Clinical Trial Volunteers Suffer Reactions to CanSino Biologics'COVID-19 Vaccine
81%的临床试验志愿者对 CanSino 生物制品的2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗有不良反应
Recent Coronavirus Article:We Have a Lot of Evidence That It's a Fake Story All Over The World–German Doctors
最近的冠状病毒文章:我们有很多证据证明这是一个假故事在世界各地-德国医生
The Takeaway:When it comes to vaccine safety,why does mainstream media constantly point fingers and call those who have concerns"anti-vax conspiracy theorists?"Why don't they ever address the science and concerns being raised that paint vaccines in a light that they've never been painted in?What's going on here?Why are the safety concerns addressed by many scientists and doctors always ignored and never addressed/countered?Would more rigorous safety testing of our vaccines not be in the best interests of everybody?Who would ever oppose that and why?
要点:说到疫苗的安全性，为什么主流媒体总是指责那些担心疫苗安全性的人，称他们为"反 vax 阴谋论者"为什么他们从来没有解决过科学问题和人们提出的关于将疫苗描绘成一种从未被描绘过的光的问题呢？这是怎么回事？为什么许多科学家和医生所关注的安全问题总是被忽视，从来没有得到解决？对我们的疫苗进行更严格的安全性测试难道不符合每个人的最大利益吗？谁会反对这一点，为什么？
来源：
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/09/12/chinese-virologist-claims-she-will-be-publishing-evidence-proving-covid-19-is-manmade/
