2020年9月15日11:03:04科学家发现,2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗可能加重2019冠状病毒疾病流行病的病情已关闭评论 4507763字阅读25分52秒





What Happened:A paper recently published in The Lancet titled"Covid-19 vaccine trials should seek worthwhile efficacy"states the following:


Deployment of a weakly effective vaccine could actually worsen the COVID-19 pandemic if authorities wrongly assume it causes a substantial reduction in risk,or if vaccinated individuals wrongly believe they are immune,hence reducing implementation of,or compliance with,other COVID-19 control measures.Deployment of a marginally effective vaccine could also interfere with the evaluation of other vaccines,as subsequent vaccines would then have to be compared with it rather than with a placebo.


The paper also points out that"There is a danger that political and economic pressures for rapid introduction of a COVID-19 vaccine could lead to widespread deployment of a vaccine that is in reality only weakly effective(eg,reducing COVID-19 incidence by only 10–20%),perhaps because of a misleadingly promising result from an underpowered trial."


Why This Is Important:The race for a coronavirus vaccine has highlighted how science has become extremely politicized.Dr.Marcia Angell,a physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal(NEMJ),also considered one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world,alongside The Lancet,stated the following for that precise reason:

为什么这很重要:冠状病毒疫苗的竞争已经突出了科学已经变得极端政治化。内科医生、《新英格兰医学杂志》(NEMJ)长期主编玛西娅·安吉尔(Marcia Angell)博士也被认为是世界上最负盛名的同行评议医学期刊之一,与《柳叶刀》(The Lancet)一样,她为了这个确切的原因发表了以下声明:

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines.I take no pleasure in this conclusion,which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine."(source)

"我们再也不可能相信已经发表的许多临床研究,也不可能依赖值得信赖的医生的判断或权威的医学指南。作为《新英格兰医学杂志》(The New England Journal of Medicine)的编辑,我慢慢地、不情愿地得出了这个结论。"(来源)

The corruption is never-ending when it comes to the link between corporations,politics and government agencies.In fact,only a few years ago,more than a dozen scientists from within the CDC put out an anonymous public statement detailing the influence corporations have on government policies.They were referred to as the Spider Papers.


We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency.It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests.It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders.What concerns us most,is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviours.Others see it and turn the other way.Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right.We have representatives from across the agency that witness this unacceptable behaviour.It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units.These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.We would like to see high ethical standards and thoughtful,responsible management restored at CDC.We are asking that you do your part to help clean up this house!


Mainstream media outlets are picking up on the desire for a rushed vaccine and blaming Donald Trump.But this isn't because of the dangers of a rushed vaccine,it's simply to make the president look bad.That's politics,two different politicians could be pushing for the same thing,but how it's portrayed and beamed into the minds of the masses via mainstream media may be different depending on their political/corporate affiliations.

主流媒体对匆忙研制疫苗的渴望愈演愈烈,并指责唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)。但这并不是因为匆忙接种疫苗的危险性,而只是为了让总统难堪。这就是政治----两个不同的政治家可能会推动同一件事情,但是通过主流媒体向大众传播的方式可能会根据他们的政治/企业背景而有所不同。

Here's an article from the New York Times regarding Gerald Ford and his rushed vaccine.CNN recently published an article titled"Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be'colossally stupid.'


To paint vaccines in any type of harmful light is something we don't really see from mainstream media.Perhaps there are going to be multiple vaccines here?One that is rushed and demonized by mainstream media,and another to follow that is praised,both most likely being colossal money makers.


But the question,are vaccines safe and effective in general?


The National Childhood Vaccine Injury(NCVIA)has already paid out approximately$4 billion to compensate families of vaccine injured children.As astronomical as the monetary awards are,they're even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1%of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System(VAERS).If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct–only 1%of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated–then up to 99%of vaccine injuries go unreported.

全国儿童疫苗受伤(NCVIA)已经支付了大约40亿美元,以补偿接种疫苗受伤儿童的家庭。尽管金额巨大,但考虑到卫生和公众服务部声称只有约1%的疫苗伤害报告给了疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS),这个数字更加令人担忧。如果 VAERS HHS 的数字是正确的——只有1%的疫苗伤害被报告,只有1/3的请愿得到补偿——那么高达99%的疫苗伤害没有被报告。

Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients,and 1.4 million doses(of 45 different vaccines)were given to 376,452 individuals.Of these doses,35,570 possible reactions(2.6 percent of vaccinations)were identified.This is an average of 890 possible events,an average of 1.3 events per clinician,per month.This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.(source)

20066月至200910月收集了715000名患者的初步数据,并向376452人注射了140万剂(45种不同的疫苗)。在这些剂量中,确定了35,570种可能的反应(2.6%的疫苗接种)。这是平均890个可能事件,平均每个临床医生每月1.3个事件。这些数据是在2009 AMIA 会议上公布的。(来源)

This completely contradicts the CDC's claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines.


Recent Articles Published Regarding Vaccine Efficacy In General:


Landmark FDA Paper On Aluminum Safety In Vaccines

具有里程碑意义的 FDA 关于疫苗中铝安全性的论文

RFK Jr.&Children's Health Defense Sue University of California For Making Flu Shot Mandatory

RFK 和儿童健康保护组织起诉加利福尼亚大学强制注射流感疫苗

Biochemical Engineer Drops Bombshell Facts About Measles&The MMR Vaccine In Washington

生化工程师在华盛顿揭露麻疹和 MMR 先生疫苗的爆炸性事实

US Gov&Yale Hold Clinical Trials To Test"Persuasive Messages For COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake"


81%of Clinical Trial Volunteers Suffer Reactions to CanSino Biologics'COVID-19 Vaccine

81%的临床试验志愿者对 CanSino 生物制品的2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗有不良反应

Recent Coronavirus Article:We Have a Lot of Evidence That It's a Fake Story All Over The World–German Doctors


The Takeaway:When it comes to vaccine safety,why does mainstream media constantly point fingers and call those who have concerns"anti-vax conspiracy theorists?"Why don't they ever address the science and concerns being raised that paint vaccines in a light that they've never been painted in?What's going on here?Why are the safety concerns addressed by many scientists and doctors always ignored and never addressed/countered?Would more rigorous safety testing of our vaccines not be in the best interests of everybody?Who would ever oppose that and why?

要点:说到疫苗的安全性,为什么主流媒体总是指责那些担心疫苗安全性的人,称他们为" vax 阴谋论者"为什么他们从来没有解决过科学问题和人们提出的关于将疫苗描绘成一种从未被描绘过的光的问题呢?这是怎么回事?为什么许多科学家和医生所关注的安全问题总是被忽视,从来没有得到解决?对我们的疫苗进行更严格的安全性测试难道不符合每个人的最大利益吗?谁会反对这一点,为什么?



  • 本文由 发表于 2020年9月15日11:03:04
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接