Once again, it turns out that the alternative media — outlets like ours, for instance — were 100 percent right about the most life-changing health event of our lifetimes thus far: the COVID-19 pandemic.
Not only did the alternative media report early and correctly that the virus was likely the product of experimental research that leaked, accidentally or otherwise, from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, but we were also out front questioning the veracity of reports that claimed the vaccines were ‘highly effective’ at preventing the spread of the disease.
Turns out, we were right about that, too.
You may recall not long ago the left-wing hatred and insanity people throughout the Western world faced who did not want to take a vaccine. Deemed “anti-vaxxers,” many were shunned, canceled online, and fired from their jobs. They were made to feel worse than second-class citizens, and many were deprived of their basic legal and constitutional rights, all because they attempted to exercise some caution about a vaccine that was experimental and proven to be highly dangerous for millions of people.
But as it turns out, the skeptical ‘anti-vaxxers’ were justified in their refusal to take the jab, mostly because the claim being pushed by governments and the mainstream ‘scientific’ community that the vaccines prevented the spread of COVID-19 was a lie, according to a comprehensive investigative report published this week in Tablet Magazine:
Vaccine mandates were mainly rationalized through the belief that the higher the rate of vaccination, the less the virus would spread. For example, during oral arguments for Biden’s health care worker mandate, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Elena Kagan claimed that health care workers had to get vaccinated “so that you’re not transmitting the disease.” But recently, on Oct. 10, 2022, a Pfizer spokesperson told the European Parliament that the vaccines had never actually been tested for preventing transmission. While this was presented on social media as “breaking news,” the fact that the vaccines were not tested for this purpose has been documented extensively ever since Pfizer and Moderna received their original Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
疫苗的授权主要是通过相信疫苗接种率越高，病毒传播就越少而合理化的。例如，最高法院副法官埃琳娜 · 卡根(Elena Kagan)在口头辩论拜登医疗保健工作者的职责时声称，医疗保健工作者必须接种疫苗，“这样才不会传播疾病。”但是最近，2022年10月10日，辉瑞公司的一位发言人告诉欧洲议会，这些疫苗实际上从未被用于预防传播。尽管这在社交媒体上被称为“突发新闻”，但自从辉瑞和摩登纳公司获得最初的紧急使用授权(EUA)以来，这些疫苗并没有为此目的进行测试这一事实已被广泛记录在案。
On Dec. 10, 2020, in a Food and Drug Administration meeting where the first mRNA vaccines were authorized, an adviser to the agency, Dr. Patrick Moore, said: “Pfizer has presented no evidence in its data today that the vaccine has any effect on virus carriage or shedding, which is the fundamental basis for herd immunity.” Despite the information that was presented for individual efficacy, Moore added that “we really, as of right now, do not have any evidence that it will have an impact, social-wide, on the epidemic.”
2020年12月10日，在美国食品和药物管理局(Food and Drug Administration)一次会议上，该机构的顾问帕特里克 · 摩尔(Patrick Moore)博士批准了第一批 mRNA 疫苗。他说: “辉瑞公司今天的数据中没有提供任何证据表明，该疫苗对病毒携带或脱落有任何影响，而这是群体免疫的根本基础。”尽管提供了个人疗效的信息，摩尔补充说，“到目前为止，我们确实没有任何证据表明它会对流行病产生全社会的影响。”
Also, the FDA EUA press release from December 2020 confirms that there was no “evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-COV-2 from person to person.”
Put another way, most people were led to believe the vaccines prevented the spread of the virus because they were told that was the case by liars who wanted to mislead the masses so they could impose their will. This was also done, of course, with the help of the deep state’s allies in the ‘mainstream’ media and on the major social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, all of whom censored or took down content that questioned the ‘accepted official narratives’ on COVID.
换句话说，大多数人被引导去相信疫苗阻止了病毒的传播，因为他们被骗子告知这是事实，他们想要误导大众，这样他们就可以强加他们的意志。当然，这也得益于深层政府在“主流”媒体和主要社交媒体平台(如 Twitter、 Facebook 和 YouTube)上的盟友的帮助，所有这些平台都审查或删除了质疑冠状病毒疾病“公认官方叙事”的内容。
“For anyone content with their vaccination status, this might not be a big deal. Yes, the vaccine information that was provided in 2021 wasn’t entirely accurate, but you might still feel that getting vaccinated was the right decision,” Tablet Magazine noted, before pointing out: “However, being misinformed about potential benefits and risks is an enormous deal for, say, a male college athlete who got vaccinated because he wanted to protect his elderly family members, but who then developed myocarditis.”
The COVID-19 pandemic, which led to crippling economic shutdowns and massive shifts in wealth, was a scam from start to finish. And we still have not felt all of the effects of the bad policy decisions, including keeping kids out of school for two years.