COVID:去毒树的根部——乔恩•拉波波特

2020年5月15日11:54:34COVID:去毒树的根部——乔恩•拉波波特已关闭评论 4418566字阅读28分33秒

2020513

(To join our email list,click here.)

(要加入我们的电子邮件列表,请点击这里)

I've just finished recording part-5 of"The Creation of a False Pandemic"with Catherine Austin Fitts.You can listen to it it here.Catherine covers the vital global economic consequences of this covert op,and we discuss the'new normal'and what it means for people who value their freedom."

我刚刚和凯瑟琳·奥斯汀·菲茨一起完成了《假传染病的产生》第五部分的录音。你可以在这里听。凯瑟琳报道了这次秘密行动对全球经济产生的重要影响,我们讨论了'新常态',以及它对那些珍视自由的人意味着什么。"

Before I jump in,I want to point to a film that hacks away the leaves,the branches,the trunk and the roots of the poisonous tree of vaccination all at once:VAXXED II,directed by Brian Burrowes.I urge you to watch it."Urge"is too light a word.What is coming down the pipeline at us,in terms of attempts at vaccine mandates…this film will only strengthen your resolve,even if you're quite sure you don't need strengthening.The film contains many interviews with parents of vaccine-devastated children,and the children are there,too.The children who have died are there as well.Nobody has ever made a film like this.

在我开始之前,我想指出一部电影,它同时砍掉了接种疫苗的毒树的树叶、树枝、树干和树根:VAXXED II,由布莱恩·伯罗斯执导。我劝你还是看看吧。"敦促"这个词太轻了。这部电影只会加强你的决心,即使你非常确定你不需要加强。这部电影包含了许多对疫苗接种受损儿童父母的采访,孩子们也在那里。死去的孩子也在那里。从来没有人拍过这样的电影。

A month or so ago,a reader made a crucial point:researchers and writers should make it clear whether they are operating from WITHIN the official paradigm of the epidemic,in order to reveal gross inconsistencies and internal contradictions;or whether they are standing OUTSIDE that paradigm and attacking its basic foundations.

大约一个月前,一位读者提出了一个关键的观点:研究人员和作者应该弄清楚他们是否在传染病的官方范式内运作,以揭示严重的不一致性和内部矛盾;或者他们是否站在范式之外并攻击其基本基础。

Going further,we need to drill down to the roots of the poisonous tree.

再进一步,我们需要深入到毒树的根部。

Some people make this calculation:"I don't want my view to appear too radical.That would drive the audience away.So I'll cut myself off at a certain point and try to give the audience pieces of the puzzle they can digest…"

有些人这样计算:"我不希望我的观点显得太激进。这会把观众吓跑的。因此,我会在某个时刻切断自己的思路,尝试给观众们提供一些他们可以理解的拼图碎片......"

For example,they would assert:"I'm not against vaccines.I just want to make them safer."

例如,他们会断言:"我不是反对疫苗,我只是想让它们更安全。"

They would say:"We have to agree there is a new virus spreading around the world.If we don't,people will reject everything we say.So let's focus on whether the virus is as dangerous as health officials claim it is."

他们会说:"我们必须承认,有一种新病毒正在世界各地传播。如果我们不这样做,人们会拒绝我们所说的一切。因此,让我们把注意力集中在这种病毒是否像卫生官员声称的那样危险。"

They would say:"We have to accept official case numbers as a starting point,even if untold numbers of people are being diagnosed with COVID by a casual glance at their symptoms,and even if the tests are inaccurate…"

他们会说:"我们必须接受官方的病例数字作为起点,即使不计其数的人只是偶然地瞥了一眼他们的症状就被诊断出得了结肠炎,即使测试是不准确的......"

Bit by bit,and piece by piece,people would be accepting the official COVID story,until there is very little to argue about.

一点一点,一点一点,人们会接受官方的COVID故事,直到没有什么可争论的。

Let's take the issue of safer vaccines.How are they going to be made safer?Manufacturers are going to throw in the towel and just eliminate the toxic adjuvants?They'll eliminate the injected germs which are the very basis of the exercise?They'll make vaccines in outer space,where,hopefully,contamination with random viruses would be avoided?

让我们以更安全的疫苗为例。他们将如何变得更安全?制造商们打算放弃使用这种有毒的佐剂吗?他们会把注射进去的细菌消灭掉而这些细菌正是这项运动的基础?他们将在外太空制造疫苗,希望在那里能避免随机病毒的污染?

Deeper still,why do immune systems need a"rehearsal for the real thing"—which is the foundational hypothesis underlying vaccination.Nature isn't sufficient?We must fight off every conceivable germ with a shot in the arm?

更深层次的问题是,为什么免疫系统需要一个"真实情况的预演"ーー这是疫苗接种的基本假设。大自然还不够吗?我们必须用一针强心剂击退所有细菌?

Why not try to improve the strength of immune systems through non-medical means?Nutrition,for instance,was the key reason for the historical decline of traditional diseases.Along with improved sanitation.No matter how many vaccines you inject in a person with a weak immune system,he is going to get sick(aside from the obvious toxic effects of the vaccines).

为什么不试着通过非医学手段来提高免疫系统的强度呢?例如,营养是传统疾病历史性下降的关键原因。和现代化厕所设备一起。无论你给一个免疫系统薄弱的人注射多少疫苗,他都会生病(除了疫苗明显的毒性作用)

"No,let's not go there.Too many people will reject us if we reject vaccines."

"不,我们不要去那里。如果我们拒绝接种疫苗,会有太多人拒绝我们。"

I beg to differ.We are in a long-term war against the medical cartel.It's not going away.Think ten thousand years into the future.That's a reasonable estimate of the length of the battle.

恕我不敢苟同。我们正在与医药卡特尔进行一场长期的战争。它不会消失。想想一万年后的未来。这是对战斗持续时间的合理估计。

"Look,I know there are serious questions about the original discovery of the COVID virus.Maybe the researchers didn't use the proper procedures.But let's not awaken that sleeping giant.Too many people won't be able to fathom what we're talking about.It's too far out.Then they'll reject everything else we're saying."

"听着,我知道关于最初发现的 COVID 病毒存在严重的问题。也许研究人员没有使用正确的程序。但是我们不要唤醒那个沉睡的巨人。太多的人无法理解我们在谈论什么。太远了。然后他们就会拒绝我们所说的一切。"

Yes?And?So?Sooner or later we're going to have to bring up the subject.Because this isn't the only time"discovery"was faked.And it won't be the last.So let's jump in now.Don't stint.Don't hold back.Go to the root.

什么事?然后呢?那又怎样?我们迟早要提出这个问题。因为这不是唯一一次伪造"发现"。这不会是最后一次。所以我们现在就开始吧。不要吝啬。不要退缩。找到根部。

I think of my good friend and colleague,Robert Scott Bell.Go to his site,robertscottbell.com.Listen to his radio show.He's been on the front lines of health for more than 20 years.Every day.He dives deep.He never lets people forget that the terrain vs.the germ is still one of the most important debates in human history.Are germs the basic problem,or is the overall condition of the body and its ability to remain vibrant and resilient the paramount factor?

我想起了我的好朋友和同事,罗伯特·斯科特·贝尔。访问他的网站,robertscottbell.com。听他的广播节目。20多年来,他一直在医疗卫生的第一线工作。每一天。他潜得很深。他从来没有让人们忘记,地形与细菌仍然是人类历史上最重要的辩论之一。细菌是基本问题,还是身体的整体状况及其保持活力和弹性的能力才是最重要的因素?

That argument has been largely forgotten,even in the natural health community.Why?Because over time,too many people have said,"Oh,we can't bring THAT up.It's too radical for the masses."

即使是在自然健康领域,这种观点也基本上被遗忘了。为什么?因为随着时间的推移,太多的人说,"哦,我们不能提起这个。这对大众来说太激进了。"

Yes,so now it's those natural people who are wearing masks and lining up like robots,waiting to get into health food stores,during the"pandemic."Across town,it's more or less business as usual,at the supermarket,where shoppers who eat plastic corn dogs and guzzle sodas have more basic common sense than the elite Mother Earth Boys and Girls.

是的,所以现在是那些自然界的人们戴着口罩,像机器人一样排着队,在"大流行"期间等待进入健康食品商店
在城市的另一边,超市里的生意或多或少都和往常一样,在那里,吃塑料玉米热狗和狂饮苏打水的购物者比精英的地球母亲男孩和女孩有更多的基本常识。

—Thus proving you can accept every"natural"slogan coming down the pipeline and still cower in fear at THE VIRUS.

ー证明你可以接受每一个"自然"的口号,但仍然害怕病毒。

The issue isn't the content of slogans.It's the acceptance of any gross shortcuts that seek to avoid the need to do something called THINKING.

问题不在于口号的内容。这是接受任何粗略的捷径,试图避免需要做的事情称为思考。

"Oh.But we must have slogans.People are too dim to figure out matters on their own."

"哦,但是我们必须有口号。人们太笨了,不能自己解决问题。"

Good luck with that notion.Do you really believe you can win a long-term war,AT THE ROOT,by engaging in a contest of slogans?That's like saying the failure to teach basic literacy in schools stems from older computers.We need better computers in classrooms.Idiot's delight,brought to you by Bill Gates.

祝你好运。你真的相信你可以通过参与一场口号竞赛,从根本上赢得一场长期的战争吗?这就好比说,学校教授基本读写能力的失败源于老旧的计算机。我们需要教室里有更好的电脑。傻瓜的快乐,由比尔·盖茨带给你。

A ten-thousand-year war.Don't shrink away from it.

一万年的战争,不要退缩。

Here's an example of root vs.compromise.It's called pellagra.

这里有一个 vs.compromise.it 的例子叫糙皮病。

Among the symptoms:Large scaly sores.Huge areas of red inflamed skin.Diarrhea.Weakness.Loss of appetite.Abdominal pain.

症状包括:大面积鳞状疮疡,大面积皮肤红肿,腹泻,虚弱,食欲不振,腹痛。

In the early 20th century,several million people in the American South suffered from it.Public health officials asserted the cause was a germ.

20世纪早期,美国南部有数百万人遭受这种疾病的折磨。公共卫生官员断言,病因是细菌。

The question was,which germ?A prestigious government commission was appointed to find the answer.

问题是,是哪种细菌?一个著名的政府委员会被任命去寻找答案。

At the time,there were people who suspected a germ wasn't the cause,but they kept their mouths shut,in part because they thought they couldn't sell the idea.It was too radical.Better to argue about whether quarantines would work.Better to argue about whether studies proved that case clusters were a fertile area for research.Better to argue about whether the germ might be carried in corn,across farms.Better to argue about unique weather conditions in the South,where the disease was concentrated.Argue about anything other than the existence of a germ as the causative agent.

当时,有些人怀疑细菌不是病因,但他们保持沉默,部分原因是他们认为自己无法接受这个想法。这太激进了。最好是争论隔离是否有效。更好的办法是争论研究是否证明了案例集群是研究的肥沃领域。最好争论一下这种细菌是否会在玉米中传播,是否会跨越农田。最好是争论疾病集中的南方独特的天气条件。争论除了细菌作为病原体的存在以外的任何事情。

Flash forward THIRTY YEARS.After fighting their own war,a few researchers correctly convinced the medical world that pellagra was the result of a niacin deficiency.

闪回30年。在打完自己的战争之后,一些研究人员正确地使医学界相信糙皮病是由烟酸缺乏引起的。

There was no germ.It didn't exist.It was a pompous assumption,championed by arrogant scientists,who wanted to own the territory of disease research.

没有细菌。它根本不存在。这是一个华而不实的假设,得到了那些想拥有疾病研究领域的傲慢科学家的拥护。

What if the few dissenting investigators,who endured three decades of utter rejection by the establishment,had decided,"Well,we can't claim there's no germ involved at all.That would be too much.We can't go that far.We can't go to the root.Let's debate about the weather,the case clusters,the corn fields—issues where we can make a stand,where we can have an effect…"

如果少数持不同意见的研究人员,忍受了三十年来被权势集团彻底抛弃的痛苦,决定说:"好吧,我们不能说根本没有涉及到细菌。那就太多了。我们不能走那么远。我们不能去根部。让我们就天气、集群、玉米地等问题展开辩论,在这些问题上,我们可以表明立场,我们可以发挥作用......"

来源:

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/13/covid-going-to-the-root-of-the-poisonous-tree/

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2020年5月15日11:54:34
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接