2019年10月16日11:20:33其他揭露化学专家:二氧化碳不会导致全球变暖已关闭评论4257字数 5954阅读19分50秒阅读模式



Originally from 2017.


Chemistry Expert:Carbon Dioxide Can't Cause Global Warming


Dr.Mark Imisides,Stillness in the Storm,10/11/2019



Why on earth do we attribute any heating of the oceans to carbon dioxide,when there is a far more obvious culprit,and when such a straightforward examination of the thermodynamics render it impossible.


Carbon dioxide,we are told,traps heat that has been irradiated by the oceans,and this warms the oceans and melts the polar ice caps.While this seems a plausible proposition at first glance,when one actually examines it closely a major flaw emerges.


In a nutshell,water takes a lot of energy to heat up,and air doesn't contain much.In fact,on a volume/volume basis,the ratio of heat capacities is about 3300 to 1.This means that to heat 1 litre of water by 1˚C it would take 3300 litres of air that was 2˚C hotter,or 1 litre of air that was about 3300˚C hotter!


This shouldn't surprise anyone.If you ran a cold bath and then tried to heat it by putting a dozen heaters in the room,does anyone believe that the water would ever get hot?


The problem gets even stickier when you consider the size of the ocean.Basically,there is too much water and not enough air.


The ocean contains a colossal 1,500,000,000,000,000,000,000 litres of water!To heat it,even by a small amount,takes a staggering amount of energy.To heat it by a mere 1˚C,for example,an astonishing 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 joules of energy are required.


Let's put this amount of energy in perspective.If we all turned off all our appliances and went and lived in caves,and then devoted every coal,nuclear,gas,hydro,wind and solar power plant to just heating the ocean,it would take a breathtaking 32,000 years to heat the ocean by just this 1˚C!


In short,our influence on our climate,even if we really tried,is miniscule!


So it makes sense to ask the question–if the ocean were to be heated by'greenhouse warming'of the atmosphere,how hot would the air have to get?If the entire ocean is heated by 1˚C,how much would the air have to be heated by to contain enough heat to do the job?


Well,unfortunately for every ton of water there is only a kilogram of air.Taking into account the relative heat capacities and absolute masses,we arrive at the astonishing figure of 4,000˚C.


That is,if we wanted to heat the entire ocean by 1˚C,and wanted to do it by heating the air above it,we'd have to heat the air to about 4,000˚C hotter than the water.


And another problem is that air sits on top of water–how would hot air heat deep into the ocean?Even if the surface warmed,the warm water would just sit on top of the cold water.


Thus,if the ocean were being heated by'greenhouse heating'of the air,we would see a system with enormous thermal lag–for the ocean to be only slightly warmer,the land would have to be substantially warmer,and the air much,much warmer(to create the temperature gradient that would facilitate the transfer of heat from the air to the water).


Therefore any measurable warmth in the ocean would be accompanied by a huge and obvious anomaly in the air temperatures,and we would not have to bother looking at ocean temperatures at all.


So if the air doesn't contain enough energy to heat the oceans or melt the ice caps,what does?


The earth is tilted on its axis,and this gives us our seasons.When the southern hemisphere is tilted towards the sun,we have more direct sunlight and more of it(longer days).When it is tilted away from the sun,we have less direct sunlight and less of it(shorter days).


The direct result of this is that in summer it is hot and in winter it is cold.In winter we run the heaters in our cars,and in summer the air conditioners.In winter the polar caps freeze over and in summer 60-70%of them melt(about ten million square kilometres).In summer the water is warmer and winter it is cooler(ask any surfer).


All of these changes are directly determined by the amount of sunlight that we get.When the clouds clear and bathe us in sunlight,we don't take off our jumper because of'greenhouse heating'of the atmosphere,but because of the direct heat caused by the sunlight on our body.The sun's influence is direct,obvious,and instantaneous.


If the enormous influence of the sun on our climate is so obvious,then,by what act of madness do we look at a variation of a fraction of a percent in any of these variables,and not look to the sun as the cause?


Why on earth(pun intended)do we attribute any heating of the oceans to carbon dioxide,when there is a far more obvious culprit,and when such a straightforward examination of the thermodynamics render it impossible.


Dr.Mark Imisides is an industrial chemist with extensive experience in the chemical industry,encompassing manufacturing,laboratory management,analysis,waste management,dangerous goods and household chemistry.He currently has a media profile in The West Australian newspaper and on Today Tonight.For a sample of his work visit www.drchemical.com.au

马克·伊米赛德斯博士是一位工业化学家,在化学工业方面有丰富的经验,包括制造、实验室管理、分析、废物管理、危险品和家用化学。他目前在《西澳大利亚报》和《今晚》上都有媒体报道。为了得到他工作的样本,请访问 www.drchemical.com.au



  • 本文由 发表于 2019年10月16日11:20:33
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接