读者来信|GMan757:本•福尔福德、索拉•法尔等人的另一个视角

2019年11月5日09:30:41读者来信|GMan757:本•福尔福德、索拉•法尔等人的另一个视角已关闭评论 59111633字阅读38分46秒

A recent reader post that shed pretty much negative light on a couple of sources that I have read regularly for the past two years has had me pondering whether to write a response to the post.This reader post labelled both Ben Fulford(https://benjamainfulford.net)and Sorcha Faal(https://whatdoesitmean.com)as disinformation agents.

最近一篇读者的帖子对我过去两年来经常阅读的几个资料来源给出了相当负面的评价,这让我考虑是否要给这篇帖子写一封回信。这篇文章把本杰明·富尔福德(https://benjamainfulford.net)和索查·法尔((https://whatdoesitmean.com)都称为假情报代理人。

That label would imply intentional effort to publish false information.I would first like to note that there is no such thing as a 100%accurate source of truth.

这个标签意味着有意发布虚假信息。我首先要指出的是,并不存在100%准确的事实来源。

Today,after reading a Vice article painting Jordan Sather,Dr.Michael Salla,and others as dangerous conspiracy theorists,it became clear that another voice advocating togetherness in the truth community was needed.

今天,在阅读了Vice的一篇文章后,乔丹·萨瑟、迈克尔·萨拉博士和其他人被描绘成危险的阴谋论者,很明显,需要另一个声音来倡导真理社区的团结。

My goal here,taking a que from the old saying"don't throw the baby out with the wash water",is to convey the idea there is a lot of valuable information out there,if you apply the correct filter.

我在这里的目的是,借鉴一句老话"不要把宝宝和洗澡水一起倒掉",就是要传达这样一个信息:如果你使用了正确的过滤器,你就会得到很多有价值的信息。

And,that information can be processed without destroying the messenger.The real liars,such as those among the MSM,will readily become evident once you do the research.

而且,这些信息可以在不破坏信使的情况下被处理。真正的说谎者,比如MSM中的那些人,一旦你做了调查,就会很容易变得明显。

QAnon reminds us that together we are strong and divided we are weak.I would add that this concept should cross the boundaries of all truth"communities".

卡农提醒我们,团结起来我们是强大的,分裂的我们是弱小的。我要补充的是,这一概念应该跨越所有真理"社区"的界限。

That means that truth applies to geopolitical,exopolitical(UFO.Secret Space Program),environmental,health,suppressed technologies and spiritual communities in equal measure.

这意味着真相适用于地缘政治、外星政治(UFO)。秘密空间计划),环境,健康,被压制的技术和精神社区在同等程度上。

Awakening to all of these truths simultaneously may well be the true greatest fear of the Elites.People such as David Wilcock,Corey Goode,James Gilliland,and Jordan Sather,who report on topics that cross disciplines seem to be targets of aggressive character assassination or attempts to discredit their work.

同时觉醒到所有这些真理很可能是精英们真正最大的恐惧。像大卫·威尔科克科里·古德James Gilliland,和乔丹·萨瑟这样的人,他们报道的话题跨学科似乎成为了人格暗杀的攻击目标,或者试图诋毁他们的工作。

So,what is really wrong with honing our critical thinking and discernment skills,and improving our BS meter?In the process of expanding on this,I will need to both"call out",and to heap praise on Jordan Sather.

那么,磨练我们的批判性思维和辨别能力,提高我们的BS表到底有什么错呢?在扩大这个过程中,我将需要"呼吁",并堆积赞扬乔丹萨瑟。

Ben Fulford is a writer who has developed a variety of sources,presents their information unedited,and leaves it to the reader to do their own validation research.

·富尔福德是一位作家,他开发了各种各样的资源,未经编辑地展示他们的信息,然后让读者自己进行验证性研究。

David Wilcock has made a conservative estimate that Ben's information is around 60%accurate(could be considerably higher).Ben has taken a lot of flak for the incorrect bits of information,but in my opinion,it should not lessen the value of the accurate bits.

大卫·威尔科克保守地估计,本的信息准确率约为60%(可能还要高得多)。本因为那些不正确的信息而受到了猛烈的抨击,但在我看来,这不应该降低那些准确信息的价值。

Sorcha Faal,on the other hand,relies mostly on Russian Intelligence and government sources.Obviously,while this site could be open to being led toward following a Russian agenda,it is openly conservative,pro-Trump,pro-Putin.

另一方面,索查·法尔主要依靠俄罗斯情报和政府消息来源。显然,尽管这个网站可能会被引导去遵循俄罗斯的议程,但它是公开的保守派,支持特朗普,支持普京。

According to the https://Whatdoesitmean.com web site,this is an order of Catholic Nuns whose Mother Superior is from Ireland,with a Webmaster based in France.

根据该网站,这是一个天主教修女的修道院院长来自爱尔兰,网站管理员总部设在法国。

The articles are primarily very anti-deep state,anti-socialism,and convey knowledge of spirituality that is way beyond that of the Catholic church.

这些文章主要是非常反深层的国家,反社会主义,并传达的精神知识是远远超出了天主教会。

The current Mother Superior has studied with molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev,who was featured in some of David Wilcock's presentations on his Gaia series,"Wisdom Teachings".That is quite relevant to the upcoming"event".

现在的修道院院长已经跟随分子生物学家Pjotr Garjajev学习,他曾在大卫·威尔科克的盖亚系列"智慧教导"中出现过。这与即将到来的"事件"非常相关。

Now for the first bit of the"much more",enter Alex Jones and Infowars.Infowars was instrumental in my personal great awakening.

现在,让我们来看看"更多"的第一部分:亚历克斯·琼斯和"信息战"。信息战对我个人的伟大觉醒起到了重要作用。

Somewhere around early 2015,I began watching Infowars videos and reading David Wilcock's blog,as well as watching videos with David and Corey Goode(I forget which came first).

大约在2015年初,我开始观看Infowars的视频,阅读大卫·威尔科克的博客,以及与大卫和科里·古德一起观看视频(我忘了是哪个先来的)

I then began to realize the world I thought I lived in never existed.

然后我开始意识到我以为我生活的世界从未存在过。

After QAnon"outed"Alex as an individual"in it for the money",as well as being controlled by Mossad,Jordan Sather presented an excellent YouTube segment regarding that information and his personal experience with Infowars.

Qanon"为了钱"揭露了Alex的个人身份,同时也被摩萨德控制,乔丹·萨瑟YouTube上展示了一段关于这些信息以及他在Infowars的个人经历的精彩片段。

In this Video,Jordan did not condemn Alex.He simply explained how,during an interview,Roger Stone had attempted to control the content and cut Jordan off,short of what he wanted to say.However,he went on to tell how Infowars had a positive effect on his own awakening.

在这段视频中,乔丹并没有谴责亚历克斯,他只是简单地解释了在一次采访中,罗杰·斯通试图控制视频的内容,切断了与乔丹的联系,而没有说出他想说的话。然而,他接着讲述了信息战如何对自己的觉醒产生了积极的影响。

Jordan took a similar tact with his appearance on Commedy Central,and an interview with the Washington Post.Rather than focus on the corrupt media he was dealing with,he chose to focus how he could inject some truth into the conversation.

乔丹接受《华盛顿邮报》采访时也采取了类似的策略。他没有关注与他打交道的腐败媒体,而是专注于如何在谈话中注入一些真相。

Jordan published a video this week on his YouTube channel,"Destroying the Illusion",in which he did a masterful job of breaking down the Vice article by MJ Banias.

本周,乔丹在他的YouTube频道上发布了一个名为"破坏幻觉"的视频,在这个视频中,他娴熟地分解了MJBaniasVice文章。

In this video,he went point by point through the article,highlighting the false information,as well as references to experts(phony or misleading experts).

在这段视频中,他逐条通过文章,强调虚假信息,以及引用专家(虚假或误导专家)

All in an attempt to paint journalists or truthers like Jordan or Dr.Salla as dangerous conspiracy theorists.

这一切都是为了把像乔丹或萨拉博士这样的记者或真相揭露者描绘成危险的阴谋论者。

This reminds me of the days of old CNN where Larry King could not have a controversial guest on his show without including Joe Nichol,or some similar"expert".

这让我想起了以前的CNN,在那里拉里·金的节目里,如果没有乔·尼科尔(JoeNichol)或者类似的"专家",就不可能有一位有争议的嘉宾。

Joe was a professional"debunker"who would often quote a bit of valid science,totally out of context and having little or no relevance to the topic du jour.All in an attempt to discredit the guest...

乔是一个专业的"揭露者",他经常引用一些有效的科学,完全脱离上下文,与当前的话题几乎没有关系。这一切都是为了败坏客人的名声..

However,I was a bit disappointed with how Jordan handled the two video segments where he stated that Sorcha Faal was a disinformation site.In the most recent,his argument was that their headlines are"click bait",and their source links did not work.

然而,我对乔丹处理两个视频片段的方式有点失望,他说索查·法尔是一个虚假信息网站。在最近的一篇文章中,他认为他们的标题是"点击诱饵",而且他们的源链接不起作用。

First,I would agree that the headlines are frequently click bait.Then,I would also add that the headlines are frequently intentional misdirection,designed lead the reader to a more important point.

首先,我同意标题经常是诱饵点击。然后,我还要补充一点,标题往往是有意的误导,设计引导读者到一个更重要的点。

For example,a headline might include something like the United States is about to push the world into WWIII.Once they reel you in,then they explain that the Deep State elements within the US really are attempting to start WWIII,while Trump and Putin are standing in the way of that attempt.

例如,一个标题可能包括美国即将推动世界进入第三次世界大战。一旦他们骗了你,然后他们解释说,美国内部的"深州"势力确实在试图发动第三次世界大战,而特朗普和普京正在阻挠这一企图。

Once you get deeper into their articles,you find a lot of dots being connected and a fair amount of sauce provided.

一旦你深入了解他们的文章,你会发现很多点连接在一起,而且提供了相当多的调料。

Another issue that Jordan raised was the links provided in the articles did not work.While I have not yet had time to research this issue very deeply,links I tried on the most recent article did work.

约旦提出的另一个问题是条款中提供的链接不起作用。虽然我还没有时间深入研究这个问题,但我在最近的文章中尝试的链接确实有用。

I would add that usually the article has an ad or an image linked toreduxmedia.com just below the header.I normally use a VPN,utilizing a variety of cities,when accessing the site,and some days it shows that to be blocked when the page loads.Possibly,that could be the case with the links that Jordan tried.

我想补充的是,通常文章有一个广告或图片链接到刚刚低于标题。我通常使用VPN,利用各个城市,当访问网站时,有时它会显示当页面加载时被屏蔽。也许,这可能是乔丹试图联系的情况。

The bottom line here is to learn your source.Do they have an agenda?Are they habitual liars,gatekeepers or limited hangout,or honest people who make occasional mistakes?

这里的底线是了解你的信息来源。他们有议程吗?他们是习惯性的说谎者,守门人或者有限的常去的地方,还是偶尔犯错的诚实的人?

The habitual liars will rarely prove useful,other than to provide an idea of what the opposition is promoting.In the case of MSM,who or what are they attacking.Their targets are usually right over target(pun intended).

惯于撒谎的人很少会被证明是有用的,除了提供一个反对派正在促进什么的概念。在MSM的情况下,他们攻击的是谁或者什么。他们的目标通常正好超过目标(双关语)

A tip for determining if someone has an agenda is first to learn what they don't or won't say.Second,how important is money?

确定一个人是否有议程的一个窍门是首先了解他们没有说或不会说什么。其次,钱有多重要?

In the case of Alex Jones,he will not have much negative to say about Israel or Zionists.Remember after he attempted to hijack the Q movement,QAnon called him out over money and being controlled by Mosad.

在亚历克斯琼斯的情况下,他不会有太多的负面说以色列或犹太复国主义者。还记得在他试图劫持Q运动之后,QAnon因为金钱和被摩萨德控制而把他叫出来。

Yet,on the positive side,Infowars has been instrumental in Red Pilling a significant portion of the awakened population.

然而,从积极的一面来看,信息战在Red Pilling唤醒了相当一部分人口。

Over the two plus years that I have followed Ben Fulford closely,much of his reporting has been pretty much in line with that provided by David Wilcock and Corey Goode.

在我密切关注本富尔福德(Ben Fulford)的两年多时间里,他的大部分报道都与大卫威尔科克(David Wilcock)和科里古德(Corey Goode)提供的报道非常一致。

Ben's agenda appears to be keeping elites(albeit benevolent elites)in the governance process after the swamp is drained.I Also we have not seen much negative coverage of the Rockefeller family in his articles.

本的议程似乎是让精英阶层(尽管是仁慈的精英阶层)在经济衰退之后继续参与治理过程。我也没有在他的文章中看到太多关于洛克斐勒家族的负面报道。

Five or six months ago,he become so anti Trump that I questioned if it was the same person writing.I have since noticed this corresponded with turning up the heat on the deep state,and might be a reflection of sources.

五六个月前,他变得如此反对特朗普,以至于我怀疑是不是同一个人写的。从那时起,我就注意到,这与深层状态的热量增加是一致的,而且可能是源头的反射。

Recently Been has been quoting more commentary from Gordon Duff,editor of the Veterans Today Web site(https://www.veteranstoday.com).Gordon Duff has been an open Trump hater since the election of 2016.A few of the reader comments on Ben's site hinted that both had Rockefeller ties.

最近Been引用了《今日退伍军人》网站(https://www.veteranstoday.com)编辑Gordon Duff的更多评论。自2016年大选以来,戈登·达夫一直公开憎恨特朗普。本网站上的一些读者评论暗示两人都与洛克菲勒有关系。

That could possibly indicate Gordon Duff's agenda.He is also open opponent of Zionists.Could it be that he just simply failed to get the QAnon message that Israel was being left for last.

这可能暗示了戈登·达夫的计划。他也是犹太复国主义者的公开反对者。难道他只是没有得到以色列被留在最后的QAnon信息。

However,aside from the Veterans Today opinion of POTUS,it still has value.The site publishes articles from a wide variety of writers,and has a decent grasp of Middle East news.

然而,除了《今日退伍军人》对美国总统的评价之外,它还是有价值的。该网站发表各种作家的文章,对中东新闻了如指掌。

The greatest asset of Veterans Today is an absolute MUST READ article from 2015 by Preston James,Ph.D.,entitled"The Hidden History of the Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia(Updated)".

今天退伍军人最大的财富是普雷斯顿·詹姆斯博士2015年的一篇绝对必读的文章,题为"不可思议的邪恶的可萨黑手党的隐藏历史(更新)"

This single article provides the full history of the origins of Zionism(fake Jews,not Hebrews),the Deep State,and how the Zionists,Khazarians,Rothschilds(Federal Reserve),Vatican,and Mosad took over the US.

这篇单独的文章提供了关于犹太复国主义(假犹太人,不是希伯来人)起源的完整历史,深层国家,以及犹太复国主义者,哈萨克人,罗斯柴尔德(美联储),梵蒂冈,摩萨德如何接管了美国。

As for Sorcha Faal's agenda,I don't recall reading much negative against the Vatican(makes sense,eh?),and one of their primary intel sources is Russian.

至于索查·法尔的议程,我不记得读到过多少对梵蒂冈的负面评价(有道理,嗯?)他们的主要情报来源之一是俄罗斯。

In spite of this,their articles tend to side with the good of humanity.And their series of spiritual articles involving Eisenhower show a knowledge way beyond religious dogma control structures.

尽管如此,他们的文章还是倾向于人性的善。他们关于艾森豪威尔的一系列精神文章展示了一种超越宗教教条控制结构的知识。

In summary,use your discernment skills and keep your BS meter at the ready.Focus on what makes sense and toss that which does not.

总而言之,运用你的洞察力,让你的BS表处于准备状态。把注意力集中在有意义的事情上,扔掉没有意义的事情。

While many of us will have our favorites,don't forget there may be valuable information in these other sources.I try to save at least a little time each week to search these,as well as to seek undiscovered new sources.

虽然我们中的许多人都有自己的最爱,但是不要忘记在这些其他资源中可能有有价值的信息。我试图每周至少节省一点时间来搜索这些信息,以及寻找未被发现的新信息源。

We must embrace all in the communities that make an honest effort toward the good of humanity.I used the plural of communities because we need to spread our wings and share the love with all communities,and ultimately all of humanity.

我们必须拥抱社区中所有为人类福祉做出诚实努力的人。我之所以使用多元社区,是因为我们需要展开翅膀,与所有社区,最终与全人类分享爱。

来源:https://operationdisclosure1.blogspot.com/2019/11/reader-post-gman757-another-perspective.html

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2019年11月5日09:30:41
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接