当场发现:CDC 改变检测阈值实质上消除 Vaxx’d 中新发的 COVID 病例

2021年5月27日14:17:56当场发现:CDC 改变检测阈值实质上消除 Vaxx’d 中新发的 COVID 病例已关闭评论 6545739字阅读19分7秒
摘要

新政策将人为地抑制接种疫苗的”突破性感染”,而旧规则将继续提高未接种疫苗的病例数。

作者:Kit Knightlyoff-guardian.org:

New policies will artificially deflate"breakthrough infections"in the vaccinated,while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

新政策将人为地抑制接种疫苗的"突破性感染",而旧规则将继续提高未接种疫苗的病例数。

当场发现:CDC 改变检测阈值实质上消除 Vaxx’d 中新发的 COVID 病例

The US Center for Disease Control(CDC)is altering its practices of data logging and testing for"Covid19"in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy"vaccines"are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

美国疾病控制中心(CDC)正在改变其数据记录和"Covid19"测试的做法,以使实验性的基因疗法"疫苗"看起来在预防所谓的疾病方面是有效的。

They made no secret of this,announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May,(though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

他们毫不掩饰这一点,于4月底/5月初在自己的网站上宣布了政策变化(尽管自然而然地没有承认变化背后相当明显的动机)

The trick is in their reporting of what they call"breakthrough infections"–that is people who are fully"vaccinated"against Sars-Cov-2 infection,but get infected anyway.

关键在于他们对所谓的"突破性感染"的报告——即那些完全"接种" Sars-Cov-2病毒感染疫苗的人,但还是被感染了。

Essentially,Covid19 has long been shown–to those willing to pay attention–to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

从本质上讲,科维迪19(Covid19)长期以来一直被证明是一个完全创造出来的流行病故事,其基础是两个关键因素:

1.False-positive tests.The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold(CT value)

假阳性测试。不可靠的 PCR 检测可以通过改变周期阈值(CT )来操纵报告大量的假阳性

2.Inflated Case-count.The incredibly broad definition of"Covid case",used all over the world,lists anyone who receives a positive test as a"Covid19 case",even if they never experienced any symptoms.

夸大的个案数目。"Covid 病例"的定义非常宽泛,在世界各地广泛使用,将接受阳性检测的人列为"Covid19病例",即使他们从未经历过任何症状。

Without these two policies,there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all,and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.

如果没有这两项政策,根本就不会有明显的大流行,现在 CDC 已经颁布了两项政策变化,这意味着它们不再适用于接种疫苗的人群。

Firstly,they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected"breakthrough infections".

首先,他们正在降低他们的 CT 值时,测试样本可疑的"突破性感染"

From the CDC's instructions for state health authorities on handling"possible breakthrough infections"(uploaded to their website in late April):

疾病预防控制中心对各州卫生当局处理"可能突破性感染"的指示(四月下旬上载至其网站):

For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold(Ct)value,submit only specimens with Ct value≤28 to CDC for sequencing.(Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)

对于已知循环阈值(Ct)的病例,只将 Ct ≤28的标本提交 CDC 进行测序。( Ct 值较高的情况下测序是不可行的。)

Throughout the pandemic,CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm,with labs around the world going into the 40s.

在整个流感大流行期间,CT 值超过35是正常的,世界各地的实验室都接近40岁。

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result,despite experts warning that this was pointless(even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

基本上,实验室为了取得积极的结果,正在进行必要的周期运行,尽管专家警告说这是没有意义的(即使 Fauci 自己也说超过35个周期的任何东西都是没有意义的)

But NOW,and only for fully vaccinated people,the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer.That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of"breakthrough infections"being officially recorded.

但是现在,只有完全接种疫苗的人,疾病预防控制中心将只接受28个周期或更少的样本。这只能是为了减少正式记录的"突破性感染"的数量而慎重作出的决定。

Secondly,asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as"covid cases".

其次,无症状或轻微感染将不再被记录为"孕妇病例"

That's right.Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19,the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don't result in hospitalisation or death.

没错。即使以低 CT 28采集的样本可以被测序成据称导致 Covid19的病毒,CDC 将不再保留那些不会导致住院或死亡的突破性感染的记录。

From their website:

来自他们的网站:

As of May 1,2021,CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause.This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance.Previous case counts,which were last updated on April 26,2021,are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.

截至202151日,CDC 从监测所有已报告的疫苗突破性病例转向专注于鉴别和调查由任何原因引起的住院病例或死亡病例。这种转变将有助于最大限度地提高收集到的对临床和公共卫生最重要的病例数据的质量。以往的个案统计数字上次更新是在二二一年四月二十六日,现时只供参考,未来不会更新。

Just like that,being asymptomatic–or having only minor symptoms–will no longer count as a"Covid case"but only if you've been vaccinated.

就像这样,没有症状或只有轻微症状将不再被算作"Covid病例",但只有当你接种了疫苗。

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis.Meaning,from now on,unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.

疾病预防控制中心制定了新的政策,有效地建立了分级诊断系统。也就是说,从现在开始,未接种疫苗的人比接种疫苗的人更容易被诊断为 Covid19

Consider…

想想..

Person A has not been vaccinated.They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and,despite having no symptoms,they are officially a"covid case".

A 人尚未接种疫苗。他们使用 PCR 检测40个周期的 Covid 阳性,尽管没有症状,他们正式成为一个"Covid 病例"

Person B has been vaccinated.They test positive at 28 cycles,and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever.Because they never went into a hospital and didn't die they are NOT a Covid case.

B 人已接种疫苗。他们在28个疗程中检测出阳性,并因高烧卧床6周。因为他们从来没有去过医院,也没有死去,所以他们不是一个Covid病例。

Person C,who was also vaccinated,did die.After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems.Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles,so they're not officially a Covid case either.

同样接种过疫苗的 c 人确实死了。由于高烧和呼吸系统问题住院周后。只是他们的 PCR 阳性检测是29个周期,所以他们也不是正式的 Covid 病例。

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a"disease"that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

美国疾病控制与预防中心正在展示一种"疾病"的魅力,这种"疾病"的出现或消失取决于你如何衡量它。

To be clear:If these new policies had been the global approach to"Covid"since December 2019,there would never have been a pandemic at all.

需要明确的是:如果这些新政策自201912月以来就是全球对付"Covid"的办法,那么根本就不会有大流行病。

If you apply them only to the vaccinated,but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated,the only possible result can be that the official records show"Covid"is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

如果你只对接种过疫苗的人使用它们,而对未接种过的人使用旧规则,那么唯一可能的结果就是官方记录显示,"Covid"在后者中比前者更为普遍。

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number,and systematically minimise the other.

这是一项旨在不断扩大一个数字,并系统性地减少另一个数字的政策。

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

如果不是一个明显的故意欺骗行为,那又是什么呢?

来源:

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/caught-red-handed-cdc-changes-test-thresholds-virtually-eliminate-new-covid-cases-among

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2021年5月27日14:17:56
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接