2019冠状病毒疾病 RT-PCR 测试:如何误导全人类接受社会封锁

2020年11月7日16:12:592019冠状病毒疾病 RT-PCR 测试:如何误导全人类接受社会封锁已关闭评论 47530729字阅读102分25秒
摘要

是时候让每个人都从这种消极的状态中走出来了,从这种集体的歇斯底里中走出来了,因为饥荒、贫困、大规模的失业会比SARS-CoV-2杀死更多的人!

It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance,this collective hysteria,because famine,poverty,massive unemployment will kill,mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!

是时候让每个人都从这种消极的状态中走出来了,从这种集体的歇斯底里中走出来了,因为饥荒、贫困、大规模的失业会比SARS-CoV-2杀死更多的人!

2019冠状病毒疾病 RT-PCR 测试:如何误导全人类接受社会封锁

Introduction:using a technique to lock down society

引言:用一种技术锁定社会

All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious,true and no longer questioned:

当前所有关于2019冠状病毒疾病流行病的宣传都是基于一个显而易见的、真实的假设,而且不再受到质疑:

Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVID.This assumption is misleading.

阳性的 RT-PCR 检测意味着患有 COVID,这种假设是误导性的。

Very few people,including doctors,understand how a PCR test works.

很少有人,包括医生,知道 PCR 检测是如何工作的。

RT-PCR means Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

RT-PCR 方法为实时聚合酶链反应。

In French,it means:Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.

在法语中,它的意思是:多元化的制度。

In medicine,we use this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.

在医学上,我们主要用这个工具来诊断病毒感染。

Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient,we consider different diagnoses based on tests.

从患者是否存在特定症状的临床情况出发,我们根据测试考虑不同的诊断。

In the case of certain infections,particularly viral infections,we use the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.

对于某些感染,特别是病毒感染,我们使用 RT-PCR 技术来确认临床图片提出的诊断假设。

We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated,coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!

我们不会对任何过热、咳嗽或有炎症综合征的患者进行常规 RT-PCR

It is a laboratory,molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene traces(DNA or RNA)by amplifying them.

它是基因扩增的实验室、分子生物学技术,因为它通过扩增来寻找基因痕迹(DNA RNA)

In addition to medicine,other fields of application are genetics,research,industry and forensics.

除了医学,其他应用领域还有遗传学、研究、工业和法医学。

The technique is carried out in a specialized laboratory,it cannot be done in any laboratory,even a hospital.This entails a certain cost,and a delay sometimes of several days between the sample and the result.

这项技术是在专门的实验室里进行的,不能在任何实验室里进行,甚至在医院里也不行。这需要一定的成本,有时需要几天的延迟之间的样本和结果。

Today,since the emergence of the new disease called COVID-19(COrona VIrus Disease-2019),the RT-PCR diagnostic technique is used to define positive cases,confirmed as SARS-CoV-2(coronavirus responsible for the new acute respiratory distress syndrome called COVID-19).

今天,自从出现了一种叫做2019冠状病毒疾病病毒的新疾病(COrona VIrus Disease-2019)RT-PCR 诊断技术被用来定义阳性病例,确认为 SARS-CoV-2(急性唿吸窘迫症候群称为2019冠状病毒疾病病毒的冠状病毒)

These positive cases are assimilated to COVID-19 cases,some of whom are hospitalized or even admitted to intensive care units.

这些阳性病例与2019冠状病毒疾病类似,其中一些病例住院,甚至住进重症监护病房。

Official postulate of our managers:positive RT-PCR cases=COVID-19 patients.

我们管理者的官方假设:阳性 RT-PCR 病例=2019冠状病毒疾病。

This is the starting postulate,the premise of all official propaganda,which justifies all restrictive government measures:isolation,confinement,quarantine,mandatory masks,color codes by country and travel bans,tracking,social distances in companies,stores and even,even more importantly,in schools.

这是一切官方宣传的起点假设,也是一切官方宣传的前提,它证明了政府所有限制性措施的合理性:隔离、监禁、隔离、强制性口罩、按国家和旅行禁令分列的颜色代码、跟踪、公司、商店的社交距离,甚至更重要的是学校。

This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments,supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media,to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights,the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society,the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens,under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests,and not on a real number of patients.

一些国家政府在科学安全委员会和主流媒体的支持下,将滥用 RT-PCR 技术作为一种无情和蓄意的战略,为过度措施辩护,例如侵犯大量宪法权利、破坏经济、整个社会活跃部门破产、大量普通公民的生活条件恶化,借口是基于若干阳性 RT-PCR 测试的流行病,而不是基于实际数量的病人。

Technical aspects:to better understand and not be manipulated

技术方面:更好地理解,而不是被操纵

The PCR technique was developed by chemist Kary B.Mullis in 1986.Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.

PCR 技术是化学家 Kary b.Mullis 1986年发明的。卡里·穆利斯于1993年获得诺贝尔化学奖。

Although this is disputed,Kary Mullis himself is said to have criticized the interest of PCR as a diagnostic tool for an infection,especially a viral one.

尽管这是有争议的,但据说 Kary Mullis 本人曾批评 PCR 作为一种诊断工具对感染,特别是病毒感染的兴趣。

He stated that if PCR was a good tool for research,it was a very bad tool in medicine,in the clinic.

他表示,如果 PCR 是一种很好的研究工具,那么它在医学和临床上就是一种非常糟糕的工具。

Mullis was referring to the AIDS virus(HIV retrovirus or HIV),before the COVID-19 pandemic,but this opinion on the limitation of the technique in viral infections,by its creator,cannot be dismissed out of hand;it must be taken into account!

指的是艾滋病病毒(HIV 逆转录病毒或 HIV),在2019冠状病毒疾病流行病之前,但是这种关于这种技术在病毒感染中的局限性的观点,不能被它的创造者马上否定;它必须被考虑进去!

PCR was perfected in 1992.

PCR 技术在1992年得到完善。

As the analysis can be performed in real time,continuously,it becomes RT(Real-Time)–PCR,even more efficient.

由于该分析可以实时、连续地进行,因此它变得更加有效。

It can be done from any molecule,including those of the living,the nucleic acids that make up the genes:

它可以通过任何分子完成,包括组成基因的活体核酸:

    • DNA(deoxyribonucleic acid)
      DNA(脱氧核糖核酸)
    • RNA(Ribonucleic Acid)
      RNA(核糖核酸)

Viruses are not considered as"living"beings,they are packets of information(DNA or RNA)forming a genome.

病毒并不被认为是"活的"生物,它们是构成基因组的信息包(DNA RNA)

It is by an amplification technique(multiplication)that the molecule sought is highlighted and this point is very important.

正是通过扩增技术(增殖),寻找的分子才显得突出,这一点非常重要。

RT-PCR is an amplification technique.

RT-PCR 是一种扩增技术

If there is DNA or RNA of the desired element in a sample,it is not identifiable as such.

如果样品中含有所需元素的 DNA RNA,则无法识别。

This DNA or RNA must be amplified(multiplied)a certain number of times,sometimes a very large number of times,before it can be detected.From a minute trace,up to billions of copies of a specific sample can be obtained,but this does not mean that there is all that amount in the organism being tested.

这种 DNA RNA 必须被放大(倍增)一定数量的倍数,有时是非常大的倍数,才能被检测到。从一个微小的痕迹,可以获得特定样本的数十亿份拷贝,但这并不意味着在被测试的有机体中有所有这些数量。

In the case of COVID-19,the element sought by RT-PCR is SARS-CoV-2,an RNA virus.

2019冠状病毒疾病为例,通过 RT-PCR 寻找的元件是 SARS-CoV-2,一种 RNA 病毒。

There are DNA viruses such as Herpes and Varicella viruses.

DNA 病毒,如疱疹病毒和水痘病毒。

The most well known RNA viruses,in addition to coronaviruses,are Influenza,Measles,EBOLA,ZIKA viruses.

除冠状病毒外,最著名的 RNA 病毒是流感病毒、麻疹病毒、埃博拉病毒、寨卡病毒。

In the case of SARS-CoV-2,RNA virus,an additional specific step is required,a transcription of RNA into DNA by means of an enzyme,Reverse Transcriptase.

SARS-CoV-2RNA 病毒的情况下,还需要一个额外的特定步骤,即通过一种叫做逆转录酶的酶将 RNA 转录成 DNA

This step precedes the amplification phase.

这一步骤先于放大阶段。

It is not the whole virus that is identified,but sequences of its viral genome.

被鉴定的不是整个病毒,而是它的病毒基因组序列。

This does not mean that this gene sequence,a fragment of the virus,is not specific to the virus being sought,but it is an important nuance nonetheless:

这并不意味着这个基因序列----病毒的一个片段----不是被寻找的病毒所特有的,但它仍然是一个重要的细微差别:

RT-PCR does not reveal any virus,but only parts,specific gene sequences of the virus.

RT-PCR 不能发现任何病毒,只能发现部分病毒的特定基因序列。

At the beginning of the year,the SARS-CoV-2 genome was sequenced.

在今年年初,SARS-CoV-2基因组测序。

It consists of about 30,000 base pairs.The nucleic acid(DNA-RNA),the component of the genes,is a sequence of bases.In comparison,the human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs.

它由大约30000个碱基对组成。核酸(DNA-RNA)是基因的组成部分,是一个碱基序列。相比之下,人类基因组有超过30亿个碱基对。

Teams are continuously monitoring the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome as it evolves,through the mutations it undergoes.Today,there are many variants.

随着 SARS-CoV-2病毒基因组的演变,研究小组不断监测它的突变过程。今天,有许多变种。

By taking a few specific genes from the SARS-CoV-2 genome,it is possible to initiate RT-PCR on a sample from the respiratory tract.

通过从 SARS-CoV-2基因组中提取一些特定的基因,就有可能在来自唿吸道的样本上启动 RT-PCR

For COVID-19 disease,which has a nasopharyngeal(nose)and oropharyngeal(mouth)entry point,the sample should be taken from the upper respiratory tract as deeply as possible in order to avoid contamination by saliva in particular.

对于有鼻咽(鼻子)和口咽()切入点的2019冠状病毒疾病,应该尽可能深地从唿吸道上部取样,以避免特别是唾液的污染。

2019冠状病毒疾病 RT-PCR 测试:如何误导全人类接受社会封锁

All the people tested said that it is very painful.

所有接受测试的人都说这是很痛苦的。

The Gold Standard(preferred site for sampling)is the nasopharyngeal(nasal)approach,the most painful route.

金标准(首选取样地点)是鼻咽(鼻腔)入路,最痛苦的路线。

If there is a contraindication to the nasal approach,or preferably to the individual being tested,depending on the official organs,the oropharyngeal approach(through the mouth)is also acceptable.The test may trigger a nausea/vomiting reflex in the individual being tested.

根据官方器官的不同,如果有一种用药禁忌的鼻腔入路,或者最好是针对被测者个人的,口咽入路(通过口腔)也是可以接受的。这种检查可能会引起被检查者的恶心/呕吐反射。

Normally,for the result of an RT-PCR test to be considered reliable,amplification from 3 different genes(primers)of the virus under investigation is required.

通常,为了使 RT-PCR 检测结果可靠,需要从被调查病毒的3个不同基因(引物)中进行扩增。

"The primers are single-stranded DNA sequences specific to the virus.They guarantee the specificity of the amplification reaction.»

这些引物是该病毒特有的单链 DNA 序列,它们保证了扩增反应的特异性

"The first test developed at La Charité in Berlin by Dr.Victor Corman and his associates in January 2020 allows to highlight the RNA sequences present in 3 genes of the virus called E,RdRp and N.To know if the sequences of these genes are present in the RNA samples collected,it is necessary to amplify the sequences of these 3 genes in order to obtain a signal sufficient for their detection and quantification.».

"20201月,维克多·科尔曼博士及其同事在柏林 La charité 开发了第一个测试,该测试可以突出显示病毒 eRdRp n 三个基因中的 RNA 序列。为了知道这些基因的序列是否存在于收集的 RNA 样本中,有必要扩增这三个基因的序列,以获得足够的信号,从而对其进行检测和定量。".

The essential notion of Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold or Ct positivity threshold[16].

循环时间或循环阈值或 Ct 正性阈值的基本概念[16]

An RT-PCR test is negative(no traces of the desired element)or positive(presence of traces of the desired element).

RT-PCR 检测为阴性(没有所需元素的痕迹)或阳性(有所需元素的痕迹)

However,even if the desired element is present in a minute,negligible quantity,the principle of RT-PCR is to be able to finally highlight it by continuing the amplification cycles as much as necessary.

然而,即使所需要的元件以极小的可忽略的数量存在,RT-PCR 的原理是能够通过尽可能多的延续扩增周期最终突出它。

RT-PCR can push up to 60 amplification cycles,or even more!

RT-PCR 可以推进到60个扩增周期,甚至更多!

Here is how it works:

以下是它的工作原理:

    • Cycle 1:target x 2(2 copies)
      循环1:目标 x2(2)
    • Cycle 2:target x 4(4 copies)
      循环2:目标 x4(4)
    • Cycle 3:target x 8(8 copies)
      第三阶段:目标 x8(8)
    • Cycle 4:target x 16(16 copies)
      第四期:目标 x16(16)
    • Cycle 5;target x 32(32 copies)
      循环5;目标 x32(32)
    • Etc exponentially up to 40 to 60 cycles!
      等指数高达4060个周期!

When we say that the Ct(Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold or RT-PCR positivity threshold)is equal to 40,it means that the laboratory has used 40 amplification cycles,i.e.obtained 240 copies.

当我们说 Ct(循环时间或循环阈值或 RT-PCR 阳性阈值)等于40时,这意味着实验室已经使用了40个扩增循环,即获得了240个拷贝。

This is what underlies the sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay.

这就是 RT-PCR 检测灵敏度的基础。

While it is true that in medicine we like to have high specificity and sensitivity of the tests to avoid false positives and false negatives,in the case of COVID-19 disease,this hypersensitivity of the RT-PCR test caused by the number of amplification cycles used has backfired.

虽然在医学上,我们确实希望通过高特异性和高敏感性的检测来避免伪阳性,但在2019冠状病毒疾病的情况下,由于使用了大量的扩增周期而导致的这次 RT-PCR 检测的过敏产生了事与愿违的效果。

This over-sensitivity of the RT-PCR test is deleterious and misleading!

这种 RT-PCR 检测的过度敏感性是有害的和误导的

It detaches us from the medical reality which must remain based on the real clinical state of the person:is the person ill,does he or she have symptoms?

它使我们脱离了必须基于病人真实临床状态的医学现实:病人是否生病,他或她是否有症状?

That is the most important thing!

这才是最重要的!

As I said at the beginning of the article,in medicine we always start from the person:we examine him/her,we collect his/her symptoms(complaints-anamnesis)and objective clinical signs(examination)and on the basis of a clinical reflection in which scientific knowledge and experience intervene,we make diagnostic hypotheses.

正如我在文章开头所说,在医学上,我们总是从人开始:我们检查他/她,我们收集他/她的症状(抱怨-回忆)和客观的临床体征(检查),在科学知识和经验介入的临床反思的基础上,我们提出诊断假设。

Only then do we prescribe the most appropriate tests,based on this clinical reflection.

只有这样,我们才能根据这种临床反应,开出最合适的检查处方。

We constantly compare the test results with the patient's clinical condition(symptoms and signs),which takes precedence over everything else when it comes to our decisions and treatments.

我们不断地将检测结果与病人的临床状况(症状和体征)进行比较,在我们的决定和治疗中,这一点比其他任何事情都重要。

Today,our governments,supported by their scientific safety advice,are making us do the opposite and put the test first,followed by a clinical reflection necessarily influenced by this prior test,whose weaknesses we have just seen,particularly its hypersensitivity.

今天,我们的政府,在他们的科学安全建议的支持下,正在让我们做相反的事情,把测试放在第一位,然后是必然受这个先前测试影响的临床反思,这个先前测试的弱点我们刚刚看到,特别是它的过敏。

None of my clinical colleagues can contradict me.

我的临床同事没有一个能反驳我。

Apart from very special cases such as genetic screening for certain categories of populations(age groups,sex)and certain cancers or family genetic diseases,we always work in this direction:from the person(symptoms,signs)to the appropriate tests,never the other way around.

除了一些非常特殊的情况,比如对某些类别的人群(年龄组、性别)和某些癌症或家族遗传疾病的胚胎植入前遗传筛选,我们总是朝着这个方向努力:从个人(症状、体征)到适当的测试,而不是相反的方向。

This is the conclusion of an article in the Swiss Medical Journal(RMS)published in 2007,written by doctors Katia Jaton and Gilbert Greub microbiologists from the University of Lausanne:

这是瑞士医学杂志2007年发表的一篇文章的结论,由来自洛桑大学的 Katia Jaton 博士和 Gilbert Greub 微生物学家撰写:

PCR in microbiology:from DNA amplification to result interpretation:

微生物学中的 PCR: DNA 扩增到结果解释:

"To interpret the result of a PCR,it is essential that clinicians and microbiologists share their experiences,so that the analytical and clinical levels of interpretation can be combined."

为了解释 PCR 的结果,临床医生和微生物学家必须分享他们的经验,这样分析和临床的解释水平才能结合起来

It would be indefensible to give everyone an electrocardiogram to screen everyone who might have a heart attack one day.

给每个人做心电图检查每个可能有心脏病发作的人是站不住脚的。

On the other hand,in certain clinical contexts or on the basis of specific evocative symptoms,there,yes,an electrocardiogram can be beneficial.

另一方面,在某些临床情况下,或者根据特定的唤起症状,心电图是有益的。

Back to RT-PCR and Ct(Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold).

回到 RT-PCR Ct(周期时间或周期阈值)

In the case of an infectious disease,especially a viral one,the notion of contagiousness is another important element.

对于传染病,尤其是病毒感染,传染性的概念是另一个重要因素。

Since some scientific circles consider that an asymptomatic person can transmit the virus,they believe it is important to test for the presence of virus,even if the person is asymptomatic,thus extending the indication of RT-PCR to everyone.

由于一些科学界认为无症状的人可以传播这种病毒,他们认为重要的是检测是否存在这种病毒,即使这个人没有症状,因此将 RT-PCR 的适用范围扩大到每个人。

Are RT-PCR tests good tests for contagiousness?

RT-PCR 是否能够有效地检测传染性?

This question brings us back to the notion of viral load and therefore Ct.

这个问题把我们带回到病毒载量的概念,因此 ct

The relationship between contagiousness and viral load is disputed by some people and no formal proof,to date,allows us to make a decision.

传染性和病毒载量之间的关系是有争议的一些人和没有正式的证据,迄今为止,让我们作出决定。

However,common sense gives obvious credence to the notion that the more virus a person has inside him or her,especially in the upper airways(oropharynx and nasopharynx),with symptoms such as coughing and sneezing,the higher the risk of contagiousness,proportional to the viral load and the importance of the person's symptoms.

然而,常识显然支持这样一种观点,即一个人体内的病毒越多,尤其是在上呼吸道(口咽部和鼻咽部),伴随着咳嗽和打喷嚏等症状,传染性的风险就越高,与病毒载量和患者症状的重要性成正比。

This is called common sense,and although modern medicine has benefited greatly from the contribution of science through statistics and Evidence-Based Medicine(EBM),it is still based primarily on common sense,experience and empiricism.

这就是所谓的常识,虽然现代医学已经从科学的贡献,通过统计和循证循证医学(EBM)大大受益,它仍然主要是基于常识,经验和经验主义。

Medicine is the art of healing.

医学是治疗的艺术。

No test measures the amount of virus in the sample!

没有测试措施的数额病毒的样本!

RT-PCR is qualitative:positive(presence of the virus)or negative(absence of the virus).

RT-PCR 是定性的:阳性(病毒的存在)或阴性(没有病毒)

This notion of quantity,therefore of viral load,can be estimated indirectly by the number of amplification cycles(Ct)used to highlight the virus sought.

这个概念的数量,因此,病毒载量,可以间接估计数量的扩增周期(Ct)用来突出病毒寻求。

    • The lower the Ct used to detect the virus fragment,the higher the viral load is considered to be(high).
      用于检测病毒片段的 Ct 值越低,则认为病毒载量越高()
    • The higher the Ct used to detect the virus fragment,the lower the viral load is considered to be(low).
      用于检测病毒片段的 Ct 值越高,病毒载量被认为越低()

Thus,the French National Reference Centre(CNR),in the acute phase of the pandemic,estimated that the peak of viral shedding occurred at the onset of symptoms,with an amount of virus corresponding to approximately 108(100 million)copies of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA on average(French COVID-19 cohort data)with a variable duration of shedding in the upper airways(from 5 days to more than 5 weeks)[19].

因此,法国国家参考中心(CNR)在大流行的急性期估计,病毒的排泄高峰发生在症状出现时,病毒数量平均相当于 SARS-CoV-2病毒 RNA 108(1亿)拷贝(法国2019冠状病毒疾病卫生组群数据),在上呼吸道的排泄持续时间可变(5天到5周以上)[19]

This number of 108(100 million)copies/μl corresponds to a very low Ct.

108份拷贝/μl 的数量相当于一个非常低的 ct

A Ct of 32 corresponds to 10-15 copies/μl.

Ct 值为32相当于10-15个拷贝/μl

A Ct of 35 corresponds to about 1 copy/μl.

Ct 值为35相当于1个拷贝/μl

Above Ct 35,it becomes impossible to isolate a complete virus sequence and culture it!

Ct 35以上,不可能分离出一个完整的病毒序列并进行培养!

In France and in most countries,Ct levels above 35,even 40,are still used even today!

在法国和大多数国家,Ct 水平超过35,甚至40,直到今天仍在使用!

The French Society of Microbiology(SFM)issued an opinion on September 25,2020 in which it does not recommend quantitative results,and it recommends to make positive up to a Ct of 37 for a single gene[20]!

2020925日,法国微生物学会(SFM)发表了一项意见,其中不推荐定量结果,并建议对单个基因的阳性率为37克拉!

With 1 copy/μl of a sample(Ct 35),without cough,without symptoms,one can understand why all these doctors and scientists say that a positive RT-PCR test means nothing,nothing at all in terms of medicine and clinic!

只要一份样本(Ct 35),没有咳嗽,没有症状,就可以理解为什么所有这些医生和科学家都说,一个阳性的 RT-PCR 检测没有任何意义,对医学和临床来说一点意义都没有!

Positive RT-PCR tests,without any mention of Ct or its relation to the presence or absence of symptoms,are used as is by our governments as the exclusive argument to apply and justify their policy of severity,austerity,isolation and aggression of our freedoms,with the impossibility to travel,to meet,to live normally!

正面的 RT-PCR 测试,没有提到 Ct 或其与症状是否存在的关系,被我们的政府用作唯一的论据,用来证明他们的严厉、紧缩、孤立和侵犯我们自由的政策是正确的,因为他们不能旅行,不能聚会,不能正常生活!

There is no medical justification for these decisions,for these governmental choices!

这些决定,这些政府的选择,没有医学上的正当理由!

In an article published on the website of the New York Times(NYT)on Saturday,August 29,American experts from Harvard University are surprised that RT-PCR tests as practiced can serve as tests of contagiousness,even more so as evidence of pandemic progression in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection[21].

829日,在《纽约时报》网站上发表的一篇文章中,来自哈佛大学的美国专家惊讶地发现,实用的 RT-PCR 检测方法可以作为传染性的检测手段,甚至可以作为 SARS-CoV-2感染大流行进展的证据[21]

According to them,the threshold(Ct)considered results in positive diagnoses in people who do not represent any risk of transmitting the virus!

根据他们,阈值(Ct)认为结果阳性诊断的人谁不代表任何传播病毒的风险!

The binary"yes/no"answer is not enough,according to this epidemiologist from the Harvard University School of Public Health.

这位来自哈佛大学公共卫生学院的流行病学家认为,仅有""""这两个选项是不够的。

"It's the amount of virus that should dictate the course of action for each patient tested.»

"病毒的数量应该决定每个接受检测的病人的行动方向。"

The amount of virus(viral load);but also and above all the clinical state,symptomatic or not of the person!

病毒量(病毒载量);还有首先是临床状态,有症状或无症状的人!

This calls into question the use of the binary result of this RT-PCR test to determine whether a person is contagious and must follow strict isolation measures.

这就对这种 RT-PCR 检测的二元结果用于确定一个人是否具有传染性以及是否必须遵循严格的隔离措施提出了质疑。

These questions are being raised by many physicians around the world,not only in the United States but also in France,Belgium(Belgium Health Experts Demand Investigation Of WHO For Faking Coronavirus Pandemic),France,Germany,Italy,the United Kingdom,the United States and the United Kingdom.in Germany,Spain…

世界各地的许多医生都在提出这些问题,不仅在美国,而且在法国、比利时(比利时卫生专家要求世卫组织调查假装冠状病毒大流行)、法国、德国、意大利、英国、美国和英国。在德国,西班牙..

According to them:

他们认为:

"We are going to put tens of thousands of people in confinement,in isolation,for nothing.»[22].22]And inflict suffering,anguish,economic and psychological dramas by the thousands!

"我们将无缘无故地把成千上万的人隔离关押起来。"[22].成千上万的人遭受痛苦、苦恼、经济和心理创伤!

Most RT-PCR tests set the Ct at 40,according to the NYT.Some set it at 37.

根据纽约时报的报道,大多数 RT-PCR 测试将 Ct 定为40,有些则定为37

"Tests with such high thresholds(Ct)may not only detect live virus but also gene fragments,remnants of an old infection that do not represent any particular danger,"the experts said.

专家说:"这种高阈值的检测不仅可以检测出活病毒,还可以检测出基因片段,这些基因片段不代表任何特定的危险。"

A virologist at the University of California admits that an RT-PCR test with a Ct greater than 35 is too sensitive."A more reasonable threshold would be between 30 and 35,"she adds.

加利福尼亚大学的一位病毒学家承认,Ct 大于35 RT-PCR 检测过于敏感。她补充称:"更合理的门槛是30岁至35岁之间。"

Almost no laboratory specifies the Ct(number of amplification cycles performed)or the number of copies of viral RNA per sampleμl.

几乎没有实验室指定 Ct(所进行的扩增周期数)或每个取样μl 的病毒 RNA 拷贝数。

Here is an example of a laboratory result(approved by Sciensano,the Belgian national reference center)in an RT-PCR negative patient:

以下是一例 RT-PCR 阴性患者的实验结果(由比利时国家参考中心 Sciensano 批准):

2019冠状病毒疾病 RT-PCR 测试:如何误导全人类接受社会封锁

No mention of Ct.

没有提到 ct

In the NYT,experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts,New York and Nevada that mention them.

在《纽约时报》上,专家们与马萨诸塞州、纽约州和内华达州的官员共同汇编了三组数据集。

Conclusion?

结论?

"Up to 90%of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus.»

"高达90%的检测呈阳性的人没有携带病毒。"

The Wadworth Center,a New York State laboratory,analyzed the results of its July tests at the request of the NYT:794 positive tests with a Ct of 40.

在纽约时报的要求下,纽约州实验室沃德沃斯中心分析了7月份的检测结果:794个阳性检测,Ct 值为40

"With a Ct threshold of 35,approximately half of these PCR tests would no longer be considered positive,"said the NYT.

纽约时报说:"Ct 阈值为35,大约一半的 PCR 检测将不再被认为是阳性。"

"And about 70%would no longer be considered positive with a Ct of 30!"

"如果 Ct 值为30,大约70%就不再被认为是阳性了!"

In Massachusetts,between 85 and 90%of people who tested positive in July with a Ct of 40 would have been considered negative with a Ct of 30,adds the NYT.And yet,all these people had to isolate themselves,with all the dramatic psychological and economic consequences,while they were not sick and probably not contagious at all.

纽约时报补充说,在马萨诸塞州,7月份 Ct 值为40的阳性人群中有85%90%的人,Ct 值为30的人被认为是阴性的。然而,所有这些人不得不把自己孤立起来,承受所有戏剧性的心理和经济后果,而他们并没有生病,或许根本不具有传染性。

In France,the Centre National de Référence(CNR),the French Society of Microbiology(SFM)continue to push Ct to 37 and recommend to laboratories to use only one gene of the virus as a primer.

在法国,国家微生物研究中心(CNR)、法国微生物学会(SFM)继续将 Ct 值提高到37,并建议实验室只使用病毒的一个基因作为引物。

I remind you that from Ct 32 onwards,it becomes very difficult to culture the virus or to extract a complete sequence,which shows the completely artificial nature of this positivity of the test,with such high Ct levels,above 30.

我提醒你,从 Ct 32开始,培养病毒或提取完整数列变得非常困难,这表明这种检测阳性的完全人为的性质,如此高的 Ct 水平,超过30

Similar results were reported by researchers from the UK Public Health Agency in an article published on August 13 in Eurosurveillance:"The probability of culturing the virus drops to 8%in samples with Ct levels above 35."

英国公共卫生署(UK Public Health Agency)的研究人员在813日发表在《欧洲监测》(Eurosurveillance)上的一篇文章中报告了类似的结果:" Ct 水平超过35的样本中,培养病毒的概率降至8%"

In addition,currently,the National Reference Center in France only evaluates the sensitivity of commercially available reagent kits,not their specificity:serious doubts persist about the possibility of cross-reactivity with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2,such as other benign cold coronaviruses.

此外,目前,法国国家参考资料中心只评估商用试剂盒的敏感性,而不评估它们的特异性:人们仍然严重怀疑是否有可能与 SARS-CoV-2以外的病毒交叉反应,如其他良性冷冠状病毒。

It is potentially the same situation in other countries,including Belgium.

包括比利时在内的其他国家也可能出现同样的情况。

Similarly,mutations in the virus may have invalidated certain primers(genes)used to detect SARS-CoV-2:the manufacturers give no guarantees on this,and if the AFP fast-checking journalists tell you otherwise,test their good faith by asking for these guarantees,these proofs.

同样,病毒的突变可能使某些用于检测 SARS-CoV-2的引物(基因)失效:制造商对此没有任何保证,如果 AFP 快速检查的记者告诉你不是这样的,那么通过要求这些保证来测试他们的诚意,这些证据。

If they have nothing to hide and if what I say is false,this guarantee will be provided to you and will prove their good faith.

如果他们没有什么可隐瞒的,如果我说的是假的,这个保证将提供给你,并将证明他们的诚意。

1.We must demand that the RT-PCR results be returned mentioning the Ct used because beyond Ct 30,a positive RT-PCR test means nothing.

我们必须要求反转录聚合酶链反应结果返回提到 Ct 使用,因为超过 Ct 30,一个阳性的 RT-PCR 检测意味着什么。

2.We must listen to the scientists and doctors,specialists,virologists who recommend the use of adapted Ct,lower,at 30.An alternative is to obtain the number of copies of viral RNA/μl or/ml sample.

我们必须听取科学家、医生、专家、病毒学家的意见,他们建议使用适应性 Ct,低于30。另一种方法是获得病毒 RNA/μl /ml 样本的拷贝数。

3.We need to go back to the patient,to the person,to his or her clinical condition(presence or absence of symptoms)and from there to judge the appropriateness of testing and the best way to interpret the result.

我们需要回到病人身上,回到病人身上,回到他或她的临床状况(是否有症状),然后再从中判断测试是否恰当,以及如何最好地解释结果。

Until there is a better rationale for PCR screening,with a known and appropriate Ct threshold,an asymptomatic person should not be tested in any way.

除非有更好的理由进行 PCR 筛查,并且有一个已知的和适当的 Ct 阈值,否则无症状者不应以任何方式进行检测。

Even a symptomatic person should not automatically be tested,as long as they can place themselves in isolation for 7 days.

即使是一个有症状的人也不应该自动进行测试,只要他们能够将自己隔离7天。

Let's stop this debauchery of RT-PCR testing at too high Ct levels and return to clinical,quality medicine.

让我们停止这种放荡的 RT-PCR 检测在过高的 Ct 水平和回到临床,优质药物。

Once we understand how RT-PCR testing works,it becomes impossible to let the current government routine screening strategy,inexplicably supported by the virologists in the safety councils,continue.

一旦我们了解了 RT-PCR 检测的工作原理,就不可能让当前的政府常规筛选策略继续下去了,这种策略得到了安全委员会病毒学家莫名其妙的支持。

My hope is that,finally,properly informed,more and more people will demand that this strategy be stopped,because it is all of us,enlightened,guided by real benevolence and common sense,who must decide our collective and individual destinies.

我的希望是,最后,如果得到适当的信息,越来越多的人会要求停止这种战略,因为我们所有人都是受到启发的,受到真正仁慈和常识的指导,必须决定我们集体和个人的命运。

No one else should do it for us,especially when we realize that those who decide are no longer reasonable or rational.

没有其他人应该为我们这样做,特别是当我们意识到那些做出决定的人不再合理或理性的时候。

Summary of important points:

重点摘要:

    • The RT-PCR test is a laboratory diagnostic technique that is not well suited to clinical medicine.
      RT-PCR 检测是一种实验室诊断技术,不适用于临床医学。
    • It is a binary,qualitative diagnostic technique that confirms(positive test)or not(negative test)the presence of an element in the medium being analyzed.In the case of SARS-CoV-2,the element is a fragment of the viral genome,not the virus itself.
      这是一种二元的、定性的诊断技术,它确认(阳性检验)或不(阴性检验)被分析的介质中是否存在某种元素。就 SARS-CoV-2而言,该元件是病毒基因组的一个片段,而不是病毒本身。
    • In medicine,even in an epidemic or pandemic situation,it is dangerous to place tests,examinations,techniques above clinical evaluation(symptoms,signs).It is the opposite that guarantees quality medicine.
      在医学方面,即使在流行病或大流行的情况下,将检查、检查和技术置于临床评估(症状、体征)之上也是危险的。恰恰相反,它保证了药品的质量。
    • The main limitation(weakness)of the RT-PCR test,in the current pandemic situation,is its extreme sensitivity(false positive)if a suitable threshold of positivity(Ct)is not chosen.Today,experts recommend using a maximum Ct threshold of 30.
      在目前大流行的情况下,RT-PCR 检测的主要限制(弱点)是,如果没有选择合适的阳性阈值(Ct),其极端的敏感性(假阳性)。今天,专家建议使用最大 Ct 阈值30
    • This Ct threshold must be informed with the positive RT-PCR result so that the physician knows how to interpret this positive result,especially in an asymptomatic person,in order to avoid unnecessary isolation,quarantine,psychological trauma.
      这种 Ct 阈值必须通知阳性 RT-PCR 结果,以便医生知道如何解释这种阳性结果,特别是对于无症状的人,以避免不必要的隔离、隔离和心理创伤。
    • In addition to mentioning the Ct used,laboratories must continue to ensure the specificity of their detection kits for SARS-CoV-2,taking into account its most recent mutations,and must continue to use three genes from the viral genome being studied as primers or,if not,mention it.
      除了提到使用 Ct 之外,实验室还必须继续确保其 SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒的特异性,同时考虑到 SARS-CoV-2最近的突变,并且必须继续使用正在研究的病毒基因组中的三个基因作为引物,如果没有提到的话。

Overall Conclusion

总结

Is the obstinacy of governments to use the current disastrous strategy,systematic screening by RT-PCR,due to ignorance?

政府固执地使用目前的灾难性战略,用 RT-PCR 进行系统的筛选,是因为无知吗?

Is it due to stupidity?

是因为愚蠢吗?

To a kind of cognitive trap trapping their ego?

陷入一种认知陷阱,困住他们的自我?

In any case,we should be able to question them,and if among the readers of this article there are still honest journalists,or naive politicians,or people who have the possibility to question our rulers,then do so,using these clear and scientific arguments.

无论如何,我们应该能够质疑他们,如果在这篇文章的读者中仍然有诚实的记者,或者天真的政客,或者有可能质疑我们的统治者的人,那么就用这些清晰科学的论据去质疑他们。

It is all the more incomprehensible that our rulers have surrounded themselves with some of the most experienced specialists in these matters.

更令人费解的是,我们的统治者周围都是这方面最有经验的专家。

If I have been able to gather this information myself,shared,I remind you,by competent people above all suspicion of conspiracy,such as Hélène Banoun,Pierre Sonigo,Jean-François Toussaint,Christophe De Brouwer,whose intelligence,intellectual honesty and legitimacy cannot be questioned,then the Belgian,French and Quebec scientific advisors,etc.,know all this as well.

如果我能够自己收集这些信息,分享,我提醒你,由有能力的人,以上所有怀疑的阴谋,如埃莱纳巴嫩,皮埃尔索尼戈,让-弗朗索瓦图森特,克里斯托弗德布鲁瓦,其智力,知识的诚实和合法性不容置疑,然后比利时,法国和魁北克科学顾问,等等,知道所有这一切。

So?

那又怎样?

What's going on?

怎么回事?

Why continue in this distorted direction,obstinately making mistakes?

为什么要继续这种扭曲的方向,固执地犯错误呢?

It is not insignificant to reimpose confinements,curfews,quarantines,reduced social bubbles,to shake up again our shaky economies,to plunge entire families into precariousness,to sow so much fear and anxiety generating a real state of post-traumatic stress worldwide,to reduce access to care for other pathologies that nevertheless reduce life expectancy much more than COVID-19!

重新实行限制、宵禁、隔离、减少社会泡沫、再次动摇我们脆弱的经济、让整个家庭陷入不稳定状态、播下如此多的恐惧和焦虑、在全世界造成真正的创伤后应激状态、减少其他病症的治疗机会——尽管这些病症使人们的预期寿命减少了很多——这些都不是无关紧要的2019冠状病毒疾病!

Is there intent to harm?

是否有伤害的意图?

Is there an intention to use the alibi of a pandemic to move humanity towards an outcome it would otherwise never have accepted?In any case,not like that!

是否有意图利用大流行的借口来推动人类走向一个否则永远不会接受的结果?无论如何,不是那样的!

Would this hypothesis,which modern censors will hasten to label"conspiracy",be the most valid explanation for all this?

现代审查人员会急于给这种假设贴上"阴谋"的标签,这种假设是对所有这一切的最合理解释吗?

Indeed,if we draw a straight line from the present events,if they are maintained,we could find ourselves once again confined with hundreds,thousands of human beings forced to remain inactive,which,for the professions of catering,entertainment,sales,fairgrounds,itinerants,canvassers,risks being catastrophic with bankruptcies,unemployment,depression,suicides by the hundreds of thousands.

事实上,如果我们从当前的事件中划出一条直线,如果这些事件继续下去,我们可能会再次发现自己被限制在成百上千的人中间,被迫保持不活跃,这对于餐饮、娱乐、销售、集市、流动人员、游说者等职业来说,可能会带来破产、失业、抑郁、成千上万的自杀等灾难性后果。

The impact on education,on our children,on teaching,on medicine with long planned care,operations,treatments to be cancelled,postponed,will be profound and destructive.

这对教育、对我们的孩子、对教学、对医学的影响将是深远和具有破坏性的。

"We risk a looming food crisis if action is not taken quickly."

"如果不迅速采取行动,我们可能面临一场迫在眉睫的粮食危机。"

It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance,this collective hysteria,because famine,poverty,massive unemployment will kill,mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!

现在是时候让每个人从这种负面恍惚状态,这种集体歇斯底里,因为饥荒,贫穷,大规模失业将杀死,割伤更多的人比 SARS-CoV-2

Does all this make sense in the face of a disease that is declining,over-diagnosed and misinterpreted by this misuse of overly sensitively calibrated PCR tests?

面对一种正在减少、过度诊断和误解的疾病,所有这些都有意义吗?这种误用过于敏感校准 PCR 测试的做法?

For many,the continuous wearing of the mask seems to have become a new norm.

对许多人来说,连续戴面具似乎已经成为一种新的规范。

Even if it is constantly downplayed by some health professionals and fact-checking journalists,other doctors warn of the harmful consequences,both medical and psychological,of this hygienic obsession which,maintained permanently,is in fact an abnormality!

即使一些卫生专业人士和事实核查记者不断地淡化这一问题,但其他医生警告说,这种对卫生的痴迷实际上是一种异常现象,会带来医学和心理上的有害后果!

What a hindrance to social relations,which are the true foundation of a physically and psychologically healthy humanity!

社会关系是人类身心健康的真正基础,这对社会关系是多大的阻碍啊!

Some dare to find all this normal,or a lesser price to pay in the face of the pandemic of positive PCR tests.

有些人敢于寻找所有这些正常的,或者在面对流行病的 PCR 阳性试验时付出较低的代价。

Isolation,distancing,masking of the face,impoverishment of emotional communication,fear of touching and kissing even within families,communities,between relatives…

与世隔绝,疏远,掩盖面孔,情感交流贫乏,甚至在家庭、社区、亲戚之间,对触摸和接吻的恐惧..

Spontaneous gestures of daily life hindered and replaced by mechanical and controlled gestures…

日常生活中自发的手势阻碍和取代了机械和控制的手势..

Terrified children,kept in permanent fear and guilt…

受到惊吓的孩子们永远处于恐惧和内疚之中。

All this will have a deep,lasting and negative impact on human organisms,in their physical,mental,emotional and representation of the world and society.

所有这一切都将对人类有机体产生深刻、持久和消极的影响,包括它们的身体、精神、情感以及对世界和社会的表征。

This is not normal!

这不正常!

We cannot let our rulers,for whatever reason,organize our collective suicide any longer.

我们不能再让我们的统治者,无论出于什么原因,组织我们的集体自杀。

Translated from French by Global Research.Original source:Mondialisation.ca

全球研究》从法语翻译过来,原文来源:mondialisation.ca

Dr Pascal Sacré is a physician specialized in critical care,author and renowned public health analyst,Charleroi,Belgium.He is a Research Associate of the entre for Research on Globalization(CRG)

帕斯卡尔·萨克雷博士是一名专门从事重症护理的内科医生、作家和著名的公共卫生分析师,沙勒罗瓦。他是全球化研究中心的助理研究员

***

***

Professionals whose references and comments are the basis of this article in its scientific aspect(especially and mainly on RT-PCR):

专业人士的参考和评论是本文科学方面的基础(特别是关于 RT-PCR):

1)Hélène Banoun

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Helene_Banoun

PhD,Pharmacist biologist

药剂师生物学博士

Former INSERM Research Officer

前国家健康与医学研究院研究员

Former intern at the Paris Hospitals

前巴黎医院实习医生

2)Pierre Sonigo

Virologist

病毒学家

Research Director INSERM,worked at the Pasteur Institute

研究主任 INSERM,在巴斯德研究院工作

Heads the Virus Genetics Laboratory in Cochin,Paris.

他是科钦病毒遗传学实验室的负责人。

Participated in 1985 in the sequencing of the AIDS virus.

1985年参与艾滋病病毒的测序。

3)Christophe De Brouwer

PhD in Public Health Science

公共卫生科学博士

Honorary Professor at the School of Public Health at ULB,Belgium

比利时 ULB 公共卫生学院荣誉教授

4)Jean-François Toussaint

Doctor,Professor of Physiology at the University of Paris-Descartes

巴黎笛卡尔大学生理学博士、教授

Director of IRMES,Institute for BioMedical Research and Sports Epidemiology

生物医学研究和运动流行病学研究所 IRMES 主任

Former member of the High Council of Public Health

前公共卫生高级理事会成员

来源:

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/covid-19-rt-pcr-test-how-mislead-all-humanity-accepting-societal-lock-downs

zhunbeizhuanbian
  • 本文由 发表于 2020年11月7日16:12:59
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接