Jim stone|我们的历史与别人告诉我们的有很大的不同吗?

2019年7月24日10:12:09Jim stone|我们的历史与别人告诉我们的有很大的不同吗?已关闭评论 795 18837字阅读62分47秒
摘要

任何时候一个假设被陈述,它需要基于至少一些证据表明它可能是正确的。这个证据确实存在。有四个重要的证据支持这样的假设:冰期远比现在所说的更为严重,并且容纳了更多的冰。就格陵兰岛和消失的飞行中队而言,直接来自现代的证据有力地表明,当涉及到冰河时代的理论时,有些东西是严重错误的。

There is abundant evidence on the ocean floor that suggests this may be the case

海底有大量的证据表明情况可能是这样的

The current paradigm has suggested that during the ice ages,sea levels only fell approximately 130 meters.I however believe there is abundant evidence sea levels in fact fall 1000 meters or more.I would like to suggest that perhaps past civilizations,including Atlantis,were developed on lands that were exposed during this period.

目前的模式表明,在冰河时期,海平面只下降了大约130米。然而,我相信有大量证据表明海平面实际上下降了1000米或更多。我想说,也许过去的文明,包括亚特兰蒂斯,是在这一时期暴露出来的土地上发展起来的。

Any time a hypothesis is stated,it needs to be based on at least some evidence that indicates it may be correct.That evidence does exist.There are four important pieces of evidence to support the hypothesis that the ice ages are far more severe and trap far more ice than is currently stated.And there is,in the case of Greenland and the lost squadron,evidence directly from these modern times that strongly suggests that when it comes to the theories surrounding the ice age,something is seriously wrong.

任何时候一个假设被陈述,它需要基于至少一些证据表明它可能是正确的。这个证据确实存在。有四个重要的证据支持这样的假设:冰期远比现在所说的更为严重,并且容纳了更多的冰。就格陵兰岛和消失的飞行中队而言,直接来自现代的证据有力地表明,当涉及到冰河时代的理论时,有些东西是严重错误的。

The four pieces of evidence that strongly indicate ice ages draw ocean levels down thousands of feet are:

强烈表明冰河时期将海平面拉低了数千英尺的四个证据是:

1.Deeply submerged coral reefs.There are dead coral reefs that have been discovered around the world at depths of 2 kilometers.The conventional explanation is that massive sea floor changes dropped them to those depths.I would like to suggest that instead,when ocean levels drop during ice ages,reefs form at the new ocean levels,which can be entire kilometers lower than where they are now.Ocean levels subsequently rise too quickly during melt periods and too continuously for reefs to keep up and be formed at all levels in between.

1.被深水淹没的珊瑚礁。世界各地在2公里深的地方发现了死亡的珊瑚礁。传统的解释是,巨大的海底变化使它们沉到了那样的深度。我想说的是,当冰河时期海平面下降时,珊瑚礁会在新的海平面上形成,这个海平面会比现在低几千米。随后,海平面在融化期间上升得太快,而珊瑚礁在融化期间的所有水平上都无法跟上并形成。

2.The well known fact that the Mediterranean basin was recently a desert,and only filled up in recent times.Due to the fact that the strait of Gibraltar is only 900 feet deep,if the ocean fell 1000 meters it would leave the mediterranian high and dry,to turn into a bed of salt until the ice age was over.Once glacial melting occurred,the Mediterranean would fill relatively gently,rather than the"massive waterfall"scenario currently accepted.

2.众所周知,地中海盆地最近是一片沙漠,只是最近才被填满。由于直布罗陀海崃只有900英尺深,如果海平面下降1000米,就会使得地中海又高又干,变成一个盐层,直到冰河时代结束。一旦冰川融化发生,地中海将相对缓慢地填充,而不是目前被接受的"巨大瀑布"的情况。

3.A proven Aztec style city is submerged at 750 meters depth(over 2,000 feet down)off the western tip of Cuba.There's no evidence of a recent massive earthquake that could have dropped it that far down.Everything has been done to discredit this discovery,but sonar scans do indeed prove in spectacular detail it is there,and it is identical to the most famous sites in Mexico.

3.这座阿兹特克风格的城市位于古巴西端,水深750(超过2000英尺)。没有证据表明最近发生了一次大地震,可以把它扔到那么远的地方。人们已经做了一切来否定这个发现,但是声纳扫描确实证明了它确实存在,而且它和墨西哥最著名的地点一模一样。

4.Greenland's ice pack averages 2000 meters thick and is up to 3,000 meters thick,TODAY,with no ice age.I would like to therefore hypothesize that it is foolish to claim that during an ice age the ice,on average everywhere in the freeze zone,is not at least that thick.And that's all the thickness it would need to drop all the earth's oceans far more than a full kilometer in depth.Additionally,the lost squadron that was finally found in Greenland,was first found at a depth of 265 feet,which is far deeper than climatologists ever stated was possible when ice age theory was developed by a factor of about 10X.This proves they did not know what they were talking about in any way at all when the theories surrounding the ice ages were made up.And the error strongly indicates that the ice ages are far more severe,with far thicker ice and far more profound sea level drops than anyone ever imagined.

4.今天,没有冰河时代,格陵兰岛的冰层平均厚度为2000米,厚度可达3000米。因此,我想假设,认为在冰河时期,冰川----冰冻区的所有地方----至少没有那么厚是愚蠢的。这个厚度足以让地球上所有的海洋深度超过一公里。此外,最终在格陵兰岛找到的失踪飞行中队,最初是在265英尺深的地方被发现的,这比气候学家所说的在冰河期理论发展到10倍的时候可能发现的深度要深得多。这证明了当冰河时期的理论被编造出来的时候,他们根本不知道自己在说什么。这个错误强有力地表明,冰河时代要严重得多,冰层要厚得多,海平面下降的深度也远远超出任何人的想象。

And now the facts,which strongly support my hypothesis statements above:

下面是有力地支持我上述假设陈述的事实:

Sunken reefs are found throughout the world 2,000 meters down.Here is a key quote from"Submerged reefs are reefs formed during periods of lower sea level,which currently have little or no modern upwardcoral framework accretion.These reefs are found in water depths ranging from 25 to 2,000m depending on their tectonic setting,but most commonly between 40 and 120m on passive continental margins.They are thought to have drowned as a result of inimical environmental conditions associated with sea level rise during the last deglaciation.This source:

世界各地2000米深处都有沉没的珊瑚礁。这里引用了一句关键的话:"暗礁是在海平面较低时期形成的礁石,目前几乎没有或根本没有现代的向上的珊瑚结构增生。根据构造环境的不同,这些珊瑚礁的水深从25米到2000米不等,但最常见的是在被动大陆边缘的40米到120米之间。它们被认为是在上一次冰川消退期间,由于与海平面上升有关的恶劣环境条件而溺死的。

My comment:I'd bet a fair number of the reefs found 2 kilometers down were the"result of inimical environmental conditions associated with sea level rise during the last deglaciation"and not simply tectonic shifts.

我的评论是:我敢打赌,在海下2公里处发现的相当数量的珊瑚礁,是"上一次冰川消退期间与海平面上升有关的恶劣环境条件的结果",而不是简单的构造变化。

The deeply sunken city off the coast of Cuba is another major indicator that the current theories are wrong.

古巴海岸的深陷的城市是另一个例子

Let's take a look at this city.It is far better imaged than I thought it was.When compared to other cities of this type in Mexico,(even the one surrounding the Tula Giants,which is much smaller than this)the squares are sports arenas that have a center larger than a football field,and can accomodate well over 10,000 people.The pyramids therefore have to be absolutely huge.Aztec type civilizations built pyramids on par with those at Giza(though not as tall),and this is probably an example.The largest and third largest pyramids in the world are in Mexico.

让我们来看看这个城市。这比我想象的要好得多。与墨西哥其他类似的城市相比,(甚至包括图拉巨人周围的城市,那里要小得多)这些广场都是体育场,其中心比足球场还要大,能容纳1万多人。因此金字塔必须是绝对巨大的。阿兹特克类型的文明建造的金字塔与那些在吉萨(虽然没有那么高),这可能是一个例子。世界上最大和第三大的金字塔在墨西哥。


There is no explanation for the existence of this city where it is with the current model and there is no evidence whatsoever that a tectonic shift caused it to sink 2000 feet below the Caribbean.However,there is something the existence of this city DOES explain,and that is the legend of Atlantis.

按照目前的模式,没有任何解释可以解释这座城市的存在,也没有任何证据表明地壳构造的变化导致它在加勒比海下沉了2000英尺。然而,这座城市的存在确实可以解释一些事情,那就是亚特兰蒂斯的传说。


So let's take a look at the Atlantic seafloor in graphic elevation relief.Sure enough,if enough water is removed to expose this sunken Aztec city,a prime location for Atlantis is suddenly well above sea level.And as a bonus,pottery has been recovered from this area,from over a thousand feet below the surface.Conventional explanation:It was a dumping ground,in the ocean,500 miles from shore where sailing vessels would pleasure cruise to dispose of garbage.YEP.They'd sail all the way out there to throw garbage overboard.What a GREAT explanation!Don't waste your time out there with a deep sea submersible looking for a lost crystal ball.THANK YOU.

让我们来看看大西洋海底的海拔浮雕。可以肯定的是,如果足够的水被抽走,这个沉没的阿兹特克城市就会暴露出来,亚特兰蒂斯的首要位置就会突然远高于海平面。作为一个额外的好处,这个地区的陶器已经被发现了,在地表下超过一千英尺的地方。传统的解释是:这是一个海洋倾倒场,距离海岸500英里,在这里航行的船只可以愉快地巡航来处理垃圾。是的。他们一路航行到那里,就是为了把垃圾扔到船外。多好的解释啊!不要把你的时间浪费在深海潜水寻找丢失的水晶球上。谢谢。

Low and behold,there's dual confirmation of another flooding in recent times that can explain both Atlantis AND the submerged"Aztec"style city-the sudden filling of the Mediterranean basin.This was already explained above.If the Aztec city was at one time on dry land,there is no option whatsoever for the Mediterranean to exist at that time.It would have been a land locked salt bed.They know it recently flooded.Current estimates as to when that happened are probably wrong,and should instead be pegged directly to the time frame when Atlantis and the sunken aztec city were submerged.

不出所料,最近又发生了一次洪水,这可以解释为什么亚特兰蒂斯和阿兹特克风格的水下城市会突然充满地中海盆地。上面已经解释过了。如果阿兹特克城市曾经是在陆地上,那么地中海在那个时候是不可能存在的。那将会是一个封闭的盐层。他们知道它最近被淹了。目前关于何时发生的估计可能是错误的,应该直接与亚特兰蒂斯和沉没的阿兹特克城市被淹没的时间框架挂钩。

Technically,they were not Aztecs because of the time frame,but they were the same people,the way the city is built proves it.And they probably got knocked off their feet badly and took millenia to recover elsewhere,at higher elevations.But their technology and building style obviously survived.

严格来说,由于时间的限制,他们不是阿兹特克人,但是他们是同样的人,城市的建造方式证明了这一点。他们很可能被严重撞倒,然后花了千年的时间才在其他地方,海拔更高的地方恢复过来。但他们的技术和建筑风格显然幸存了下来。

So let's go over the numbers and do a little math to see how severe an ice age would really need to be to cause this.

所以让我们回顾一下这些数字,做一些数学运算,看看冰河时代到底有多严重,才会导致这种情况。

Do the numbers add up?YOU BET!They certainly do.

这些数字加起来合理吗?当然!的确如此。

The first thing we need to debunk is the myth that the ice age glaciers displaced so much seawater that they offset the amount of sea level drop.This sea depth map shows the reality of this-that the arctic ocean is so shallow there is no significant water there to be displaced.Most of it is much shallower than the depths of both the sunken aztec city and where I think Atlantis was.

我们首先需要揭穿的是冰河时期冰川移动了大量海水以抵消海平面下降量的神话。这张海洋深度地图显示了这一现实——北冰洋太浅,没有大量的水可以被移动。它的大部分比沉没的阿兹特克城市和我认为的亚特兰蒂斯的深度都要浅得多。


There are some places in the arctic sea that approach a mile deep,but only in trenches,the average is very shallow.And if Greenland has an ice pack that in places is already three kilometers thick,any ice age glacier sitting on top of the arctic ocean is going to be anchored solidly to the ocean floor and extend miles above sea level.So you can for the most part scratch the arctic ocean off any account of sea level rising due to the presence of glaciers.Now add to the arctic ocean ALL of Canada,much of the United States,Europe,and Russia,and cover all of that in ice 3 kilometers thick,which Greenland has,even today.Then add Antarctica,with an equal amount of ice.How much would sea level drop,from those factors?

在北冰洋有些地方接近一英里深,但只有海沟,平均深度非常浅。如果格陵兰岛的冰层有的地方已经有3公里厚,那么任何位于北冰洋顶部的冰河期冰川都将被牢牢地固定在海底,并延伸到海平面以上数英里。因此,你可以在很大程度上把北冰洋从任何由于冰川的存在而导致海平面上升的说法中剔除。现在加上北冰洋,整个加拿大、美国、欧洲和俄罗斯的大部分地区,覆盖着3公里厚的冰层,这是格陵兰岛直到今天所拥有的。然后加入南极洲,加入等量的冰。从这些因素来看,海平面会下降多少?

First,take a look at this ice age map,I'll give the stats on that,and then do the math.

首先,看看这张冰河时期的地图,我会给出统计数据,然后做个数学计算。

During the last ice age,between 30 percent and 33 percent of the world was covered in ice.

在上一个冰河时代,世界上30%33%的地方被冰覆盖。


When there is no ice age,the earth is approximately 71 percent covered by oceans The maps make it perfectly clear ice ages will very disproportionately drop sea levels in comparison to how much water they take from the ocean,because both north and south polar regions have a lot of land and shallow waters.The ice will mostly not be floating on water.

当没有冰河时代时,地球大约就是冰河时代。这些地图清楚地表明,冰河时代将使海平面相对于它们从海洋中汲取的水量而言,不成比例地下降,因为南北极地区都有大量的陆地和浅水。冰块大部分不会漂浮在水面上。

How thick would the ice caps need to be,to drop ocean levels more than a thousand meters?This is obviously going to be an estimate.The oceans cover approximately 71 percent of the earth's surface,and the arctic ocean is so shallow that it can simply be called land during an ice age.We'll give it a little credit for existing prior and not subtract the entire amount of it's percentage in total water volume.During an ice age approximately 67 percent of the world is ocean and dry land,and 33 percent is ice,with much of that ice covering what was previously land.That's a fairly close estimate.Of the amount of the world left not covered by ice(because there is disproportionately more land covered in ice than water,)probably around 80 percent is ocean rather than 71 percent,even after we omit the arctic ocean from the equation.So take the previous remaining balance of the earth that does not freeze(67 percent)and subtract 20 percent from 67 percent to get how much of the remaining not frozen world is ocean.That leaves 53.6 percent surface area(water)to offset ice thickness on 33 percent of the earth.

要使海平面下降超过一千米,冰盖需要有多厚?这显然是一个估计。海洋大约覆盖了地球表面的71%,而北冰洋是如此的浅,以至于在冰河时代它可以简单地被称为陆地。我们会对现有的优先权给予一点肯定,而不是减去它在总水量中所占的全部百分比。在冰河时代,世界上大约67%的地方是海洋和陆地,33%是冰,其中大部分冰覆盖了以前的陆地。这是一个相当接近的估计。世界上还有很多地方没有被冰覆盖(因为被冰覆盖的陆地比水多得多),其中大约80%是海洋,而不是71%,即使我们把北冰洋排除在外。所以用地球上之前剩下的不结冰的天平(67%),从67%中减去20%,得到剩下的不结冰的世界中有多少是海洋。剩下的53.6%的表面积()可以抵消33%的地球上的冰层厚度。

To drop ocean levels by 1,000 meters with those numbers,the ice sheets during the ice age only had to average 1.624 kilometers thick.If they were 3.5 kilometers thick,that would explain coral reefs occurring at 2 kilometers depth.Both numbers are well within rational limits for the thickness of the glaciers during ice ages considering the ice pack on greenland already has zones 3 kilometers thick,with an overall average thickness of 2 kilometers.

按照这个数字,要使海平面下降1000米,冰河时期的冰盖平均厚度只有1.624公里。如果它们的厚度是3.5公里,那就可以解释为什么珊瑚礁出现在2公里深的地方。考虑到格陵兰岛的冰层已经有3公里厚,这两个数字都在冰期冰川厚度的合理范围内

There will probably be a few who will claim that because there's no evidence of glacial scouring in some regions,that the glaciers were not there.That's a foolish assumption,because if there is no elevation differences in those areas to cause a glacier to flow,there won't be any scouring,and what about that big arctic ocean basin that would act as an anchoring point?To say that did not freeze over would be myopic to say the least.Everything in the freeze zone was under miles of ice,obviously.

可能会有一些人声称,因为在某些地区没有冰川冲刷的证据,所以冰川并不存在。这是一个愚蠢的假设,因为如果这些地区没有海拔差异导致冰川流动,就不会有任何冲刷,那么作为锚点的北冰洋大盆地又会怎样呢?至少可以说没有冻结是短视的。很明显,在冰冻区的所有东西都在数英里厚的冰层下。

Obviously,the entire polar region was totally frozen,just like Greenland is today.Therefore:

显然,整个极地地区完全冻结了,就像今天的格陵兰岛一样。因此:

It is not at all far fetched to think that during an ice age,the average could indeed have been enough to push ocean depths down by well over a kilometer.

认为在冰河时期,海平面的平均水平确实足以将海洋深度推进一公里以上,这种想法并不牵强。

The now dead coral reefs,at up to 2 kilometers depth are"all explained away as"tectonic shifting","but if so,how did the Caribbean end up with a city 750 meters under the water,built at a time when it was known that the Mediterranean was a dry basin?You can't blame that coincidence on tectonics,I'll hedge my bets that the ice ages have a far greater impact on ocean levels than believed,the corals indicate this,the Greenland ice pack indicates this,a deeply submerged city off the coast of Cuba indicates this,the story of Atlantis indicates this,a sunken civilization in the English channel indicates this,the stories of a"great flood"indicate this,and what would cause it?A regularly occurring micro nova on the sun that happens at the absolute peak heat the sun produces,followed by a sharp drop in solar output.The micro nova only lasts a few days.The repercussions last thousands of years.

现在已经死亡的深达2公里的珊瑚礁"都被解释为构造移动",但如果是这样的话,为什么加勒比海最终会有一个水下750米的城市,而当时人们知道地中海是一个干涸的盆地?你不能把这种巧合归咎于地质构造,我打赌冰河时代对海平面的影响比我们想象的要大得多,珊瑚表明了这一点,格陵兰岛的冰层表明了这一点,古巴海岸附近的一座深海城市表明了这一点,亚特兰蒂斯的故事表明了这一点,英吉利海峡沉没的文明表明了这一点,"大洪水"的故事表明了这一点,什么会导致这一点?发生在太阳产生的绝对峰值热量,随之而来的是太阳输出量的急剧下降。微型新星只能维持几天。这种影响持续了数千年。

Greenland can tell us all about how fast an ice age can move with the story of the lost squadron-

格陵兰岛能告诉我们冰河时代的速度有多快

During world war 2,a squadron of aircraft got lost in a storm over Greenland and was forced to land on the ice pack.Though all of the plane's crews survived and were taken back to the U.S.,search and recovery crews were sent to get the planes soon after only to find nothing.Where they went to was a complete mystery and attempts to recover them ceased.At that time(world war 2)which was long after"ice age theory"was too well established to change,they expected Greenland to only be getting a foot or so of additional ice per year,but that estimate was WAY off.In reality,Greenland gets so much additional snow pack and ice per year that it buried the lost squadron before anyone could go back to get it.The first airplane from the lost squadron was found 50 years later in 1992 by a ground penetrating radar 265 feet under the ice.That is,no doubt,a minimum marker for how fast an ice age can happen-the entire area it will put under hundreds of feet of will be buried beyond oblivion in a LOT less than a lifetime.Greenland is a prime example of the conditions that will happen and how fast it will happen when the next ice age strikes.

第二次世界大战期间,一个中队的飞机虽然所有的机组人员都幸存下来并被带回了美国,但是搜救人员很快就被派去搜寻飞机,但是什么也没有找到。他们去了哪里完全是一个谜,找到他们的尝试也停止了。在那个时候(第二次世界大战)"冰河时代理论"已经确立很久,无法改变,他们预计格陵兰岛每年只会增加一英尺左右的冰,但这个估计是错误的。事实上,格陵兰岛每年增加的积雪和冰雪太多,以至于在任何人回去取之前,它就埋葬了失去的飞行中队。50年后的1992年,在冰层下265英尺的地面穿透雷达发现了失踪中队的第一架飞机。毫无疑问,这是一个冰河时代发生速度的最小标志——整个冰河时代将被埋在数百英尺以下的地区将在不到一生的时间里被彻底湮没。格陵兰岛就是一个很好的例子,说明了下一个冰河时代到来时,将会出现什么样的情况,以及出现的速度有多快。

We don't know it all.How much does modern science know about a cycle tens of thousands of years long from a sample period of only 400 years or so?Approximately as much as you'd know about a Wal Mart after being put in it blindfolded and allowed to feel the merchandise on a single aisle.

我们不知道所有的事情。从一个400年左右的样本周期中,现代科学对一个长达数万年的周期了解多少?差不多就像你被蒙着眼睛放进沃尔玛,并且被允许在一条过道上触摸商品后对它的了解一样多。

I am therefore going to state my own hypothesis,which I think is far closer to reality than the current paradigm states:

因此,我要陈述我自己的假设,我认为这个假设比目前的模式更接近现实:

I believe earth has enormous cycles that destroy advanced civilizations.These cycles happen too rapidly for civilizations to adapt to,and follow micro novas that change reality overnight.Greenland's ice pack data makes it clear that virtually overnight the United States can be buried under 10 feet of ice and snow,followed by 10 more feet the next year,and 10 more feet the next,with it never melting.At the end of the great freeze,the reverse happens-water returns to the world's most productive regions,where civilizations are most likely to bloom,and they get destroyed all over again by the reverse process.

我相信地球有着毁灭先进文明的巨大循环。这些周期发生得太快,以至于文明无法适应,也无法跟随一夜之间改变现实的微观新星。格陵兰岛的浮冰数据清楚地表明,几乎一夜之间,美国就可以被埋在10英尺深的冰雪之下,第二年再埋10英尺,第二年再埋10英尺,而且永远不会融化。在大冰冻结束时,相反的情况发生了——水回到世界上生产力最高的地区,那里的文明最有可能繁荣发展,然后它们再次被相反的过程所摧毁。

Someone burned the library of Alexandria for a reason.Let me make a guess:

有人烧了亚历山大图书馆是有原因的。让我来猜一猜:

I'll make a bet that the library was burned so someone,a certain tribe,could falsify history and make it whatever they wanted.They erased Atlantis,and made it a"conspiracy theory"just like they are trying to erase Western civilization now,with gaydom freak shows and"common core"coupled with a massive eugenics program to stupefy entire generations with shots they claim are"vaccines".

我敢打赌,图书馆被烧毁是为了让某个人,某个部落,篡改历史,为所欲为。他们抹去了亚特兰蒂斯,并把它变成了一个"阴谋论",就像他们现在试图抹去西方文明一样。他们用同性恋怪物秀和"共同核心",再加上一个大规模的优生学计划,用他们声称是"疫苗"的疫苗让整整一代人昏迷。

I'd bet the library of Alexandria talked ALL ABOUT the end of the ice age and massive sea level rise,and the submerging of major civilizations with the most famous being Atlantis,but there were probably many more.I'd bet the library of Alexandria had records of technology that at the time it was burned,no one understood but today,the technologies would be understood clearly and someone did not want any future advanced civilization that could understand it to have it.

我敢打赌,亚历山大图书馆谈论了所有关于冰河时代的结束和海平面的大规模上升,以及主要文明的沉没,最著名的是亚特兰蒂斯,但可能还有更多。我敢打赌,亚历山大图书馆有科技的记录,在它被烧毁的时候,没有人理解,但是今天,科技将被清楚地理解,有人不希望任何未来的先进文明能够理解它拥有它。

The library of Alexandria probably had an accurate world map and full record of America,but as we see now already happening online,got replaced with"flat earth".You may think the flat earth crowd is just a bunch of loonies,but I see it as the next attempt to get people totally ignorant of everything,-a second burning of history.What about that old old folklore about"the man on the moon"?Maybe it was not just a pattern we see-maybe there is more to that story-a reason for the"cities on the moon"to be there-and people are already being fooled into denying our civilization ever went there.The destruction of the new Atlantis is well underway.

亚历山大图书馆可能有一个精确的世界地图和美国的完整记录,但是正如我们现在看到的已经在网上发生,取而代之的是"平面地球"。你可能认为地球平面的人群只是一群疯子,但我认为这是下一次试图让人们对一切都完全无知的尝试,是对历史的第二次焚烧。那个古老的关于"月球上的人"的民间传说呢?也许这不仅仅是我们看到的一种模式——也许这个故事背后还有更多——"月球上的城市"存在的一个原因——人们已经被愚弄,否认我们的文明曾经到过那里。新亚特兰蒂斯的毁灭正在顺利进行。

What if:

如果:

The Urim and Thummim were a GPS.The magical oracle was an Ipad.What about the mechanical bird?What about the"Black Knight"satellite that was still functioning and is now reported destroyed?How about things like the Palladin,which could have simply been genetic experiments that are seeing resistance now?How is it that all that magic crap from the past,which was written off as"magic"and"folklore"exists again?WE HAVE ALL THAT.Everything that was spoken of in folklore is here now,right down to an unfettered ability to create freak life forms.And it is clear and obvious with the overt attempts to destroy the United States and Europe,that someone wants those items to return to the realm of folklore,just like the unicorn,the dragon(which is genetically very possible,just combine an electric eel with something that can spit oil and use the electricity to ignite it)what if ALL THAT existed?

乌陵与土明是一个GPS。这个神奇的预言就是Ipad。机械鸟怎么样?"黑骑士"卫星仍在运行,现在据报道已经被摧毁,情况如何?比如说Palladin,它可能只是一个基因实验,现在看到了抗药性?为什么过去那些被认为是"魔法""民间传说"的魔法垃圾又存在了呢?这些我们都有。民间传说中提到的一切现在都在这里,甚至包括创造怪异生命形式的无拘无束的能力。显而易见,有人公然企图摧毁美国和欧洲,希望这些物品回到民间传说的领域,就像独角兽,龙(这在基因上是非常可能的,只要把电鳗和可以喷出油并用电点燃它的东西结合起来),如果这一切都存在呢?

I no longer believe current ice age theory.There is too much against it.It is obviously debunked.And if we can't even have a real knowledge of that,what else was taken?

我不再相信当前的冰河时代理论。反对的声音太多了。这显然已经被揭穿了。如果我们连这个都不知道,那还有什么被拿走了?

来源:http://www.jimstone.is/newsletters/newsletter1.html

  • 本文由 发表于 2019年7月24日10:12:09
  • 除非特殊声明,本站文章均来自网络,转载请务必保留本文链接