It's official.Children are less at risk of serious illness from COVID than literally any other ailment that afflicts them,yet they are the last people our government is setting free from the clutches of COVID tyranny.We have always known that children tend to get less sick from COVID than from a seasonal flu.But two new studies from California demonstrate that the risk is even lower than previously thought.
Yesterday,New York magazine published a story highlighting new studies showing that the pediatric hospitalization numbers for COVID have likely been dramatically inflated throughout the country.The first study,published in the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics,was conducted by Stanford researchers and examined 117 reputed COVID hospitalizations among those under 18 at a children's hospital in Northern California.They found that just 7.7%exhibited severe illness and 12.8%critical illness.Overall,45%were classified as"unlikely to be caused by SARSCoV2,"and it appears that most of the others weren't suffering life-threatening illness.
昨天，《纽约》杂志发表了一篇文章，强调了一项新的研究，该研究显示，全国范围内的小儿 COVID 住院治疗的数字可能已经戏剧性地夸大了。第一项研究发表在美国美国小儿科学会协会的官方杂志上，由斯坦福大学的研究人员进行，在北加利福尼亚的一家儿童医院检查了117名18岁以下被认为患有COVID的患者。他们发现，只有7.7%表现出严重疾病，12.8%表现出危重疾病。总体而言，45%的人被归类为"不太可能是 SARSCoV2引起的"，而且其他大多数人似乎并没有患上威胁生命的疾病。
The second study,published in the same journal,found in America's fifth-largest hospital that,among patients younger than 22,40%had"incidental infection,"only 47%were"potentially symptomatic,"and just 14%were"significantly symptomatic."They further found that"Fifty-five percent of incidental and 47%of potentially symptomatic patients had at least one identified comorbidity,while 90%of significantly symptomatic patients had at least one."
As Drs.Monica Gandhi and Amy Beck wrote in a commentary for Hospital Pediatrics that accompanied the two studies,"Taken together,these studies underscore the importance of clearly distinguishing between children hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 found on universal testing versus those hospitalized for COVID-19 disease."They further conclude that the data also"greatly overestimate the true burden of COVID-19 disease in children."
正如 Monica Gandhi 博士和 Amy Beck 博士在《儿科医院》的一篇评论文章中所写的那样，"综合起来看，这些研究强调了明确区分因 SARS-CoV-2而住院的儿童和因为2019冠状病毒疾病而住院的儿童的重要性。"他们进一步得出结论，这些数据也"大大高估了儿童患2019冠状病毒疾病的真实负担。"
If so many of the pediatric hospitalizations are wrongly ascribed to COVID,then how many of the already very few pediatric COVID deaths are also among individuals who died with COVID,not because of it?The CDC has already stated based on an analysis of death certificates that 35.2%of all reputed pediatric COVID deaths"could not be plausibly categorized as either a chain-of-event or significant contributing condition."
如果这么多的儿科住院病例被错误地归因于 COVID，那么在已经很少的儿科 COVID 死亡病例中，有多少也是死于 COVID，而不是因为它？疾病防治中心已经根据对死亡证明的分析表明，35.2%的被认为是小儿 COVID 死亡"不能合理地归类为事件链或重大贡献条件。"
Keeping that in mind,this table compares CDC best estimates of pediatric flu deaths with the first two seasons of…https://t.co/A0ZQreXP94
—Phil Kerpen(@Phil Kerpen)ーPhil Kerpen(@Phil Kerpen)1621011020.0
Yet,appallingly,so many schools are still requiring children to remain masked until they get an experimental vaccine that can only potentially harm them and not help them.Children already are de facto vaccinated by God.A new study published in Science magazine shows blood taken from kids before the pandemic contains memory B cells that bind SARSCoV2."These findings suggest that encounters with coronaviruses in early life may produce cross-reactive memory B cell populations that contribute to divergent COVID-19 susceptibilities,"suggest the Stanford University researchers.
然而，令人震惊的是，如此多的学校仍然要求孩子们戴上面具，直到他们得到一种实验性的疫苗，这种疫苗只能潜在地伤害他们，而不能帮助他们。事实上，儿童已经接种了上帝的疫苗。发表在《科学》杂志上的一项新研究显示，在疫情爆发前从儿童身上采集的血液中含有结合 SARSCoV2的记忆 b 细胞。斯坦福大学的研究人员表示:"这些发现表明，早期接触冠状病毒可能会产生交叉反应性记忆 b 细胞群，从而导致不同2019冠状病毒疾病的易感性。"。
Just how strong is the immunity of children?Phil Kerpen calculated the numbers of age-stratified risk of COVID using the CDC's mortality numbers and assumed for good measure that the Pfizer shot is 97%effective.Even under such a scenario,unvaccinated children are still less at risk than vaccinated young adults and 100 times less at risk than vaccinated 75+-year-olds!
儿童的免疫力到底有多强？Phil Kerpen 使用疾病预防控制中心的死亡率数据计算了年龄分层风险的数字，并假定辉瑞注射有效率为97%。即使在这种情况下，未接种疫苗的儿童的风险仍然低于接种过疫苗的年轻成年人，而且比接种过疫苗的75岁以上的人的风险低100倍！
Consider the fact that Dr.Fauci now admits that if people are vaccinated,even if they can still get the virus asymptomatically,their risk of spreading it is"very very low."Well,in January,the CDC already conceded,"Children might be more likely to be asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 than are adults."Consequently,it admits that because asymptomatic people really do not spread very often,that is likely the reason why we never experienced outbreaks in schools."This apparent lack of transmission[in schools]is consistent with recent research,which found an asymptomatic attack rate of only 0.7%within households and a lower rate of transmission from children than from adults,"wrote the CDC in a January 29 report.
考虑到这样一个事实，Fauci 博士现在承认，如果人们接种了疫苗，即使他们仍然没有病症，他们传播病毒的风险"非常非常低"在一月份，CDC 已经承认，"儿童可能比成年人更有可能是无症状的2019冠状病毒疾病。"因此，它承认，因为无症状的人确实不经常传播，这可能是为什么我们从未在学校经历过疫情爆发的原因。疾病控制和预防中心在1月29日的一份报告中写道:"这种(学校)明显缺乏传播的现象与最近的研究相一致，研究发现家庭内无症状的传播率仅为0.7%，儿童的传播率低于成年人。"。
In other words,children already are more vaccinated with immunity than adults can ever achieve even under the most bullish outcome of the vaccine.And unlike with these experimental mRNAs,God's vaccine for children comes risk-free.
换句话说，儿童已经接种了比成年人更多的免疫疫苗，即使在最乐观的结果下。与这些实验性的 mRNAs 不同，上帝为儿童提供的疫苗是无风险的。